At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:35:57 -0700,
Jack Vogel wrote:
OK, will put on my todo list :)
Thanks. A kernel built that way (i.e. with igb and em) does actually
work, which is good, but if you're going to split them up we should
get this right before 7.1.
Best,
George
At Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:53:16 -0700,
Jack Vogel wrote:
Just guessing, did someone change conf/files maybe??
If you build a STABLE kernel with igb AND em then things work and the
kernel uses em.
I'm not sure which thing needs to be changed in conf/files or
otherwise though.
Later,
George
Oh, so the problem is if igb alone is defined?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:53:16 -0700,
Jack Vogel wrote:
Just guessing, did someone change conf/files maybe??
If you build a STABLE kernel with igb AND em then things work and the
At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:07:22 -0700,
Jack Vogel wrote:
Oh, so the problem is if igb alone is defined?
Yes.
Best,
George
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
OK, will put on my todo list :)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:07:22 -0700,
Jack Vogel wrote:
Oh, so the problem is if igb alone is defined?
Yes.
Best,
George
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Just guessing, did someone change conf/files maybe??
Jack
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
As of today, this afternoon, I see the following:
linking kernel.debug
e1000_api.o(.text+0xad9): In function `e1000_setup_init_funcs':
Howdy,
As of today, this afternoon, I see the following:
linking kernel.debug
e1000_api.o(.text+0xad9): In function `e1000_setup_init_funcs':
../../../dev/em/e1000_api.c:343: undefined reference to
`e1000_init_function_pointers_80003es2lan'
