on 01/06/2009 19:22 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Henri,
thank you very much for testing!
It look like the patch did its job.
P.S. hopefully someone is looking into the cause of the assertion.
I think I cracked it.
This is where ds-ds_lock.m_owner gets corrupted:
(gdb) c
Continuing.
on 02/06/2009 17:06 Andriy Gapon said the following:
So I am quite sure that mutex_owned should be defined as follows:
#define mutex_owned(l) pthread_mutex_isowned_np((l)-m_lock)
Actually:
#define mutex_owned(l) pthread_mutex_isowned_np((l)-m_lock)
And on dangers of ignored
on 29/05/2009 15:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
So anyone else feels that this is a bug?
on 28/05/2009 16:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1 0x0008012a0feb
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/05/2009 15:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
So anyone else feels that this is a bug?
on 28/05/2009 16:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1
on 01/06/2009 19:12 Henri Hennebert said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
I propose the following patch for this issue.
It fixes mismatch between __assert extern declaration in zfs code and
actual
signature in libc code.
I also took liberty of dropping __STDC__ and __STDC_VERSION__ checks.
So anyone else feels that this is a bug?
on 28/05/2009 16:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1 0x0008012a0feb in open () from /lib/libc.so.7
#2 0x00080129ea59
