On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
1) mysqld_safe /dev/null 21 never released the tty
2) nohup mysqld_safe /dev/null 21 did release the tty
What happens if you run the following command?
daemon -cf
Something interesting I've come across which happens on both RELENG_7
and RELENG_8 (indicating it's not a problem with the older tty code or
the newer pty/pts code), and it's reproducible on Linux (sort of...).
mysqld_safe appears to hold a pty/tty open even after the process has
been
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
Something interesting I've come across which happens on both RELENG_7
and RELENG_8 (indicating it's not a problem with the older tty code or
the newer pty/pts code), and it's reproducible on Linux (sort of...).
Hi Jeremy,
* Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
1) mysqld_safe /dev/null 21 never released the tty
2) nohup mysqld_safe /dev/null 21 did release the tty
What happens if you run the following command?
daemon -cf mysqld_safe
The point is that FreeBSD's pts(4) driver
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
* Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
1) mysqld_safe /dev/null 21 never released the tty
2) nohup mysqld_safe /dev/null 21 did release the tty
What happens if you run the following command?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick ha scritto:
Until rc(8) can be updated to support daemon(8) natively,
This would be the Right Thing IMHO.
the ~76 ports
which Do The Wrong Thing(tm) should get updated to do it this way. Ones
like
Jeremy Chadwick ha scritto:
Until rc(8) can be updated to support daemon(8) natively,
This would be the Right Thing IMHO.
the ~76 ports
which Do The Wrong Thing(tm) should get updated to do it this way. Ones
like mysqlXX-server should be placed high on the priority list given
their
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:53:07AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The diff is pretty obvious/simple (2 line change), so the other
databases/mysqlXX-server ports can be upgraded in the same manner.
--- files/mysql-server.sh.in.orig
On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The diff is pretty obvious/simple (2 line change), so the other
databases/mysqlXX-server ports can be upgraded in the same manner.
--- files/mysql-server.sh.in.orig 2010-03-27 03:24:53.0 -0700
+++ files/mysql-server.sh.in
