Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-10 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 05/09/13 22:42, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to: jail -r $JAILNAME umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true The only problem with devfs I'm aware of is it not catching the right ruleset when starting in the

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-09 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty big operation. It doesn't mean you

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-09 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 05/09/13 03:17, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty

RE: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-09 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to: jail -r $JAILNAME umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true Regards, Dewayne. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-03-21 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-03-21 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 03/21/13 17:59, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-03-21 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Jamie Gritton wrote: On 03/21/13 17:59, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-03-21 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 03/21/13 18:20, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jamie Gritton wrote: On 03/21/13 17:59, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-19 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 02/18/13 09:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:26:42AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote: On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-19 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-18 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension! Accidentally I saw that devfs_ruleset seems to be ignored.

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-18 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension!

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-18 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:26:42AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote: On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8)

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-18 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 02/18/13 09:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:26:42AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote: On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime): On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on

new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-15 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension! Accidentally I saw that devfs_ruleset seems to be ignored. If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc. I set devfs_ruleset = 4; and enforce_statfs = 1; in

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-15 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension! Accidentally I saw that devfs_ruleset seems to be ignored. If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc. I