On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Where do you plan to release of 4.10 or 4.9.1? There is not info on
> http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
There are plans for at least one, and likely two, more releases on the
RELENG_4 branch. And there could well be more if there is signif
Hello!
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:15:51 -0800, Dave Tweten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>Now you see why I recommend that people wait for a month after a release
>>to update and to do it to STABLE, not release.
>
> I agree wholeheartedly. I'm surprised your truth was accepte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Now you see why I recommend that people wait for a month after a release
>to update and to do it to STABLE, not release.
I agree wholeheartedly. I'm surprised your truth was accepted as calmly
as it was. When I offered the same suggestion a few years ago I was
thoroug
> From: Felipe Neuwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:35:07 -0200
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> I always have the doubt... And when the stables goes to 5.3, how I'll
> update my 4.9-STABLE servers to the 5.3-STABLE? If I download the source
> from cvs and compi
> Good to know. Sorry for the slightly off topic reply to -stable now.
> I was going by the fact that the date for 4.2 was not mentioned on the
> website (even though I had seen it mentioned in the mailing lists), nor
But it IS listed on the web site and has for some time now. Please
see http:
On Wednesday January 10, 2001 23:22, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > Actually it says right now on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
> > that 4.3 will be available in late March. It seems unusual that
> > such a precise time would be placed on the release already. I
> > think the date
>
> Not really.
I'll go even further. Yesterday Apple (http://www.apple.com)
anounce the formal release date of March 24, 2001 for OS X.
Jessem.
On 10 Jan, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>>
>> Actually it says right now on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
>> that 4.3 will be available i
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
>
> UCB and AT&T had agreed that there were to be no new releases of BSD
> and that 4BSD was the final release. 4.1BSD - 4.4BSD were named such
> because they were "officially" only modifications to 4BSD and
> Actually, no. The distribution is called 4.4BSD, not BSD 4.4. The same
> goes for 4.1 or 4.2 which were known as 4.1BSD and 4.2BSD respectively.
> Anyone who understands what BSD is, will know the difference.
You're right. My bad. 4.4BSD.
See how easy it is to get it confused?
Allen
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> I have to agree with this poster. The next release should be
> called FreeBSD 5.0.
>
> "BSD 4.4" is a desciptive term still used to describe a whole
> family of OS's. People outside the FreeBSD circle are going to be
D 4.4 and FreeBSD 4.4. This can easily be avoided,
> > at no cost, by calling the next release FreeBSD 5.0.
> >
> I agree too.
I don't... FreeBSD is FreeBSD, and BSD is BSD - IMHO it doesn't matter
that the people who don't know the difference get confused, if they&
11 matches
Mail list logo