Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-17 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:01:27 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- manually restarting ppp(1), then: 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-17 Thread Julian Elischer
cpghost wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:01:27 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- manually restarting ppp(1), then: 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-11 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:02:50 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding brian to CC list. Alexander Motin wrote: cpghost wrote: I think such behaviour can take place if ppp daemon for some reason don't waits for reply but closes session immediately after sending connect

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread cpghost
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:11:07 +0100 cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp session

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread Julian Elischer
cpghost wrote: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:11:07 +0100 cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:11:07 +0100 cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: The problem is that the last

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread Alexander Motin
cpghost wrote: Could you provide tcpdump output for connection tries from your Ethernet interface? Use -pes 0 options please. Will do; but I'll first have to wait 24h from now to get a forcibly disconnected session (I've just had to restart ppp again). All right, I've got a good tcpdump now:

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- manually restarting ppp(1), then: 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x40C663C1]

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread Alexander Motin
cpghost wrote: If I remember correctly, sending two PADIs in quick succession was ppp's normal behaviour for *years* now (is it expected or required by the protocol? I don't know). I've always wondered why it was so. But that didn't cause any harm as it seemed one of the two PADO was picked up

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:57:46 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your host generates huge number of simultaneous session requests. Looking on different Host-Uniq values it should be different ng_pppoe sessions/hooks as Host-Uniq is actually pointer to the hook/session internal

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread Julian Elischer
cpghost wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:11:07 +0100 cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: The problem is that the

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread Julian Elischer
cpghost wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- manually restarting ppp(1), then: 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x40C663C1]

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:52:01 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: I think such behaviour can take place if ppp daemon for some reason don't waits for reply but closes session immediately after sending connect request. If it so it also explains original no

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-09 Thread cpghost
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:01:27 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- manually restarting ppp(1), then: 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-07 Thread cpghost
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp session forcibly once every 24h. Before the update, ppp would detect this and

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-06 Thread Alexander Motin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 cpghost wrote: The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp session forcibly once every 24h. Before the update, ppp would detect this and reconnect immediately. After the update,

Re: no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-06 Thread cpghost
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200 Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cpghost wrote: The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp session forcibly once every 24h. Before the update, ppp would detect this and

no matching session in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6)

2007-12-05 Thread cpghost
Hello, Since I've updated a RELENG_6 router a few days ago, a long gone problem with ppp cropped up (again?); and I'm suspecting a regression between ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.3 and 1.74.2.4. The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider that this router is attached to disconnects the