The data and stack sizes are interesting when comparing ntpd 4.2.7p411 (9.2
from 2014) vs 4.2.8p12 (on 12.1Pre)
# sh -c 'ntpd --version ; procstat -l $(pgrep ntpd)|grep -E
"data|stack|lock"'
ntpd 4.2.7p411@1.2483-o Sun Mar 9 01:25:57 UTC 2014 (1)
34798 ntpd datasize
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:50:33AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-08-25 at 15:03 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:40:22AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:28+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at
On Sun, 2019-08-25 at 15:03 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:40:22AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:28+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019
In message <9b0c95de-2d0e-89b4-32e6-63ec5af72...@nwtime.org>, Harlan Stenn
writ
es:
> Hi folks,
>
> It's easy for us to customize the default value for DFLT_RLIMIT_STACK on
> a per-version and per-OS basis. We do this in the "configure" machinery.
>
> The defaults are expected to be "generally
Hi folks,
It's easy for us to customize the default value for DFLT_RLIMIT_STACK on
a per-version and per-OS basis. We do this in the "configure" machinery.
The defaults are expected to be "generally sane", and were likely chosen
a relatively long time ago.
What would you like the value(s) to
In message , =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running stable/12 with ASLR enabled in /etc/sysctl.conf:
>
> kern.elf64.aslr.enable=1
> kern.elf64.aslr.pie_enable=1
> kern.elf32.aslr.enable=1
> kern.elf32.aslr.pie_enable=1
>
> After upgrading to anything after r350672, now at
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:03+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:40:22AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:28+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:40:22AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:28+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > I tried changing
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:28+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > I tried changing command="/usr/sbin/${name}" to
> > > > command="/usr/bin/proccontrol -m aslr -s
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > I tried changing command="/usr/sbin/${name}" to
> > > command="/usr/bin/proccontrol -m aslr -s disable /usr/sbin/${name}" in
> > > /etc/rc.d/ntpd, but that didn't
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:04:49PM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>
> > Disabling ASLR, kern.elf64.aslr.enable=0, before starting ntpd
> > manually is a workaround, but this is not viable in the long run.
>
> Why ?
I like to keep
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:04:49PM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running stable/12 with ASLR enabled in /etc/sysctl.conf:
>
> kern.elf64.aslr.enable=1
> kern.elf64.aslr.pie_enable=1
> kern.elf32.aslr.enable=1
> kern.elf32.aslr.pie_enable=1
>
> After upgrading to anything after
Hi,
I'm running stable/12 with ASLR enabled in /etc/sysctl.conf:
kern.elf64.aslr.enable=1
kern.elf64.aslr.pie_enable=1
kern.elf32.aslr.enable=1
kern.elf32.aslr.pie_enable=1
After upgrading to anything after r350672, now at r351450, ntpd
refuses to start at boot.
Aug 24 21:25:42 HOSTNAME
13 matches
Mail list logo
