[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/sys/i386/conf kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
13 0xc040 65e308 kernel
21 0xc0a5f000 59f20acpi.ko
So, yes then :) Can you follow the steps for debugging modules and see
if it gives a better trace?
Kris
Unfortunately, after
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:43:54AM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/sys/i386/conf kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
13 0xc040 65e308 kernel
21 0xc0a5f000 59f20acpi.ko
So, yes then :) Can you follow the steps for debugging modules and
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have been able to
re-create the problem fairly consistently just by looping a script that
tars
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:49:45PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have been able to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:49:45PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:49:45PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for 5 seconds
What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing?
Kris
Is this the best way to determine the action of the thread?
Regards;
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for 5 seconds
What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing?
Kris
Is this the best way to determine the action of the thread?
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:13:51PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for 5 seconds
What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing?
(kgdb) proc 18303
(kgdb) bt
#0 0xc0644f5b in sched_switch (td=0xc95a5900, newtd=0xc92aad80,
flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:973
#1 0xeaa6dcb4 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001 in ?? ()
#3 0x0ee2c000 in ?? ()
#4 0x in ?? ()
#5 0x4000 in ?? ()
#6 0x in ?? ()
#7
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
(kgdb) proc 18303
(kgdb) bt
#0 0xc0644f5b in sched_switch (td=0xc95a5900, newtd=0xc92aad80,
flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:973
#1 0xeaa6dcb4 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001 in ?? ()
#3 0x0ee2c000 in ?? ()
#4
11 matches
Mail list logo