On Nov 4, 2016, at 04:54, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Would be wonderful if someone could catch up pax(1)'s libarchive(3)
> transition, but I guess the libarchive developers aren't interested or
> have very much spare resources…
Have you asked them? Do they know it is a problem? Do they have a b
Bezüglich David Magda's Nachricht vom 04.11.2016 03:56 (localtime):
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 13:44, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>
>> Has anyone ever thought about? Unfortunately I'm lacking skills and time :-(
>
> You’ll want to talk to the folks here:
>
> http://libarchive.org
>
> That is the
On Nov 1, 2016, at 13:44, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Has anyone ever thought about? Unfortunately I'm lacking skills and time :-(
You’ll want to talk to the folks here:
http://libarchive.org
That is the upstream project. It actually started on FreeBSD over a decade ago
but spun off o
Dear hackers,
I'm frequently missing pax(1) ability to handle the pax (the POSIX pax)
format.
Backing up real-world file names and lengths doesn't work with ustar
format - which pax(1) uses and also tar(1) by default.
I'd prefer using pax(1) because of it's cli usage – personal taste…
But in pra
