Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-20 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 12/20/12 00:21, CeDeROM wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: Prerelease was using -STABLE packages. Are -stable packages in sync with port tree? Are -release frozen version of -stable when a release is made? Magic of enviroment variables... http://www.freebsd.org/doc

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-20 Thread CeDeROM
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > I don't know what the current pkg repositories for the new generation pkg > tools (or the older pkg_tools) are, thus I build them for myself with > poudriere. I prefer to use binary packages that are consistent and well tested. Many times I ha

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-20 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 12/20/12 13:40, CeDeROM wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: I use poudriere to build packages for 9.1-RELEASE i386 and make them available on http://dd.ose.nl/91i386-default Thank you Bas :-) I am using AMD64 :-) Anyway I was wondering if freebsd-stable repository wor

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-20 Thread CeDeROM
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > I use poudriere to build packages for 9.1-RELEASE i386 and make them > available on > http://dd.ose.nl/91i386-default Thank you Bas :-) I am using AMD64 :-) Anyway I was wondering if freebsd-stable repository works as a binary store for a curr

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-20 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 12/20/12 00:21, CeDeROM wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: Prerelease was using -STABLE packages. Are -stable packages in sync with port tree? Are -release frozen version of -stable when a release is made? Magic of enviroment variables... http://www.freebsd.org/doc

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-19 Thread CeDeROM
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > Prerelease was using -STABLE packages. Are -stable packages in sync with port tree? Are -release frozen version of -stable when a release is made? > Magic of enviroment variables... > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/packages-using.html Y

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-19 Thread Jakub Lach
Prerelease was using -STABLE packages. Magic of enviroment variables... http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/packages-using.html -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portupgrade-problem-after-upgrading-to-9-1-PRE-RELEASE-tp5770666p5770897.html Sent from the fre

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-19 Thread CeDeROM
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Ben Morrow wrote: > 9.1-RELEASE isn't out yet. That means the packages may not have been > built yet, and even if they have, they may not be right. Wait for the > release announcement. Yes I know there is no release yet, but I can test what is already out there :-

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-19 Thread Ben Morrow
Quoth CeDeROM : > > I was using portupgrade/portinstall -PP on 9.1-RC3 with no problem. > After freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE I cannot install any port from > packages. Should I additionally configure my system somehow? Where did > the portupgrade took the packages from last time / before upgrade?

portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

2012-12-19 Thread CeDeROM
Hello :-) I was using portupgrade/portinstall -PP on 9.1-RC3 with no problem. After freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE I cannot install any port from packages. Should I additionally configure my system somehow? Where did the portupgrade took the packages from last time / before upgrade? Any hints appr