Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:17:52 +0700
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 14.01.2021 8:16, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > all my make commands run as time make ...
> >
> > I just got this result compiling scribus:
> >
> > 5m19.94s real 1h15m31.76s user5m20.87s sys
>
14.01.2021 8:16, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all my make commands run as time make ...
>
> I just got this result compiling scribus:
>
> 5m19.94s real 1h15m31.76s user5m20.87s sys
>
> I do not know how long it really took but 1h seems far to high. It
> really cou
Hi Sijmen,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 03:07:39 +0100
"Sijmen J. Mulder" wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > 5m19.94s real 1h15m31.76s user5m20.87s sys
> >
> > I do not know how long it really took but 1h seems far to high. It
> > really could be 15min.
>
> L
Hi Erich,
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> 5m19.94s real 1h15m31.76s user5m20.87s sys
>
> I do not know how long it really took but 1h seems far to high. It
> really could be 15min.
Looks like parallel processing, e.g. make running jobs on multiple CPU
cores at once. If that's
Hi,
all my make commands run as time make ...
I just got this result compiling scribus:
5m19.94s real 1h15m31.76s user5m20.87s sys
I do not know how long it really took but 1h seems far to high. It
really could be 15min.
NTPD is running. I did not notice any large tim