Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Paul Mather
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 04:48 +0200, Vladimir Botka wrote: > Hi, > vinum is not stable under 5.4. After some "research" I found gmirror > (RAID1) is ok. There are some notes on: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html > > Cheers, > > Vladimir. > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Paul Mather wrote

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Vladimir Botka
Hi, vinum is not stable under 5.4. After some "research" I found gmirror (RAID1) is ok. There are some notes on: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html Cheers, Vladimir. On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Paul Mather wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: Hi. I may implement

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Paul Mather
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I may implement (g)vinum to stripe two 2 TB raid 5 volumes into a > > single 4 TB vinum-volume. The volumes reside on a atabeast doing the > > raid 5. The server is a 5.4 RC2 doing nfs on i386. > > > > According to some th

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Paul Mather
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: > Hi. > > I may implement (g)vinum to stripe two 2 TB raid 5 volumes into a > single 4 TB vinum-volume. The volumes reside on a atabeast doing the > raid 5. The server is a 5.4 RC2 doing nfs on i386. > > According to some threads gvinum may

vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Claus Guttesen
Hi. I may implement (g)vinum to stripe two 2 TB raid 5 volumes into a single 4 TB vinum-volume. The volumes reside on a atabeast doing the raid 5. The server is a 5.4 RC2 doing nfs on i386. According to some threads gvinum may not be completely stable (in 5.3, http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Li