Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 15:00 schrieb Søren Schmidt:
[...]
As always, enjoy and let me know how it goes...
It's running here on several RELENG_5 machines. Like with j I also can't find
any problems with k :)
But the strange 16MB/s limit on my ICH2 (i815 B-step
Tim Welch wrote:
A problem still exists with 48-bit addressing. This url details a fix
I've been using for the last 4 months or so with no issues yet.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2004-October/008821.html
Are you stil experiencing problems with atamkIII ?
In that case its a
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
ah, just commit it already. it works for me, so it must be good enough ;)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be
sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number
of interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can do to
help the situation, sadly.
Buy a PCI-X SCSI/GigE card, and use that instead of
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in
I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in FreeBSD
5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and has persisted
since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will be fixed, but no).
I downgraded back to 5.2.1-p13 and it is perfectly fine once again.
***
Frode Nordahl wrote:
I was surprised by the actual difference in system performance and
usability between 4BSD and ULE under such loads!
If you haven't tried it on your heavy trafic server yet, go and do it
right now! :-)
Just a short me too. In my case it isn't a heavy traffic server but
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:21:32 -0800, Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On February 9, 2005 04:13 pm, Ivan Roth wrote:
sorry to ask that but which software could I use to produce vectorial
graphics? Quite newbie to freebsd, don't know such free software.
Inkscape is supposed to be a very
At 06:32 10/02/2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2005-Feb-10 04:39:13 +0100, Bj?rn K?nig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Magda wrote:
It's daemon, not demon.
Or even dæmon
It's a question whether you are British or American or understand it as
a proper name. ;-)
My dictionary has both as headwords with
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 11:00 schrieb Martin Minkus:
I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in FreeBSD
5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and has persisted
since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will be fixed, but no).
I
Hi,
Running 5.3-Stable from december, this server has a login delay which I
can not really explain.
Both ssh and ftp react almost direct, only after entering the passwd the
connections sits idle for 15 secs.
So something is is taking a while, and since it is both with ssh and
ftp, I would
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 4:14:18 PM:
WJW Both ssh and ftp react almost direct, only after entering the passwd the
WJW connections sits idle for 15 secs.
WJW So something is is taking a while, and since it is both with ssh and
WJW ftp, I would assume it is the actual
On 10/2/2005 23:55, Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in
FreeBSD 5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and
has persisted since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will
be fixed, but no).
I
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
Just curious if this includes support for new chipsets or not. Not a
big deal if it doesn't, just curious.
I've got a Toshiba laptop that, unfortunately, uses the ATI IGP/IXP
chipset, which only gets detected as UDMA33 (which is
Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be
sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number of
interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can do to help
the situation, sadly.
I cannot affect the company equipment purchase policy
If this helps, I noticed this recently on the machine that has had tcp lockups.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type c49b flags 3 len 47956 max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 98b4 flags 3 len 17725 max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 8be6 flags 3 len 38514 max
Thanks to all who tried to help. I decided to move the discussion to acpi@
Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be
sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number of
interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can do to help
On Feb 10, 2005, at 16:30, Randy Bush wrote:
how about stability? last time i tried ule, the system died in
a few days.
Don't know yet.
I will keep trashing the server and post here if it crashes.
Regards,
Frode Nordahl
randy
___
Hi,
I have a CDRW burner that use to work (with 5.2.1 the last time.)
But since one of my last RELENG_5_2 update I encounter errors when
burning CDRW (I don't have CDR to test, but I rember having strange
behaviour with CDR also.) Switching to RELENG-5 (re-install 5.3 and
cvsup after) a week ago
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 05:23:46PM +0100, Marwan Burelle wrote:
Hi,
I have a CDRW burner that use to work (with 5.2.1 the last time.)
But since one of my last RELENG_5_2 update I encounter errors when
burning CDRW (I don't have CDR to test,
I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my desktop
system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME performance
under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE benches..
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:00 +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On Feb 10, 2005, at 16:30,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
I get the same error on two machines, did some googling and found no
answers that helped. (I fear I don't remember the details now.) As I
don't have the error on another machine (all running 5.3 STABLE) I
figured it was something
Hi,
There seems to be a serious problem with the puc device driver. When the driver
expiriences overflows the server simply reboots!
device puc
options PUC_FASTINTR
I have tried to rebuild a new kernel without the PUC_FASTINTR option but without
much luck. It still keeps on
Hi,
I am noticing many warnings:
calcru: negative runtime of -891485461 usec for pid 45 (swi5: clock sio)
in ps waux:
root45 0.0 0.0 08 ?? WL Tue03PM -2341058:-22.07
[swi5: clock sio]
I am seeing lots more of these messages.
Also from other processes i see the same
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:41:21 +0100
From: Marwan Burelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--neYutvxvOLaeuPCA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Scott
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
ah, just commit it already. it works for me, so it must be good enough ;)
DES
heh :)
Works for me, but one problem, slaves attached to a Seagate master,
At 11:42 AM 10/02/2005, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a serious problem with the puc device driver. When the
driver
expiriences overflows the server simply reboots!
device puc
options PUC_FASTINTR
I have tried to rebuild a new kernel without the PUC_FASTINTR
On Thu, February 10, 2005 10:39 am, Julio Capote said:
I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my
desktop system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME
performance under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE
benches..
Precisely how does one upgrade
Cvsup to RELENG_5, and change your kernel config ot include ULE and
PREMPTION support; I suggest reading the keeping up to date and
kernel compiling chapters on the handbook, if you haven't done so
already.
-Julio
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:32 -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
On Thu, February 10, 2005
On Thu, February 10, 2005 11:43 am, Kevin Oberman said:
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:32:34 -0600 (CST) From: Doug Poland
Precisely how does one upgrade 5-STABLE to include ULE + PREMPT?
Obviously I'll cvsup RELENG_5, but don't know how to set ULE +
PREMPT.
Put them in your configuration.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:42:01PM +0200, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a serious problem with the puc device driver. When the
driver
expiriences overflows the server simply reboots!
device puc
options PUC_FASTINTR
I have tried to rebuild a new
On Feb 10, 2005, at 18:22, Mipam wrote:
I noticed this:
You're running RELENG_5 on a dual Xeon 3.06GHz box
You enabled DEVICE_POLLING and ULE as well.
But normally compiling the kernel with SMP and polling won't work.
Don't you use a SMP kernel or?
I saw several pages stating that DEVICE_POLLING
On Feb 10, 2005, at 18:32, Doug Poland wrote:
On Thu, February 10, 2005 10:39 am, Julio Capote said:
I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my
desktop system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME
performance under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE
I want to add an usb harddisk.
Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a NTFS/HPFS/QNX disk
Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
What kind of dev/fstab do I need to add?
Do I need an extra swap slice? How to make one?
I'm using FreeBSD 4.11.
Thank you
Jack Raats
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Jack Raats wrote:
I want to add an usb harddisk.
Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a NTFS/HPFS/QNX disk
Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
NTFS is a Windows filesystem. You can't install FreeBSD to it but you can
mount and use the volume. See the
Doug White a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Jack Raats wrote:
I want to add an usb harddisk.
Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a NTFS/HPFS/QNX disk
Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
NTFS is a Windows filesystem. You can't install FreeBSD to it but you can
mount and use
Ivan Roth wrote:
just note that it could not be /dev/da but /dev/ad, e.g, da is
only for SCSI disks and ad is for IDE ones.
Actually no - usb disks look like scsi disks - so my 250GB usb drive
is /dev/da0
John
___
Hello,
After following the ULE status thread with some interest, I decided to
enable on my i386, hyperthread-enabled, UNP machine. Perhaps not the
best test bed, but a test none the less.
I'm running a series of make -jX buildworld to put load on the system
and running X with XFCE4 to get an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:03:33 +0100, Ivan Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just note that it could not be /dev/da but /dev/ad, e.g, da is
only for SCSI disks and ad is for IDE ones.
Only for *internal* IDE drives.
USB drives use umass which
Hello,
i had the verion 1 of the freenet6 client running for a long time. now,
after upgrading to 2.1.1 on a 5.2.1 box the tspc client dumps core. it
sometime sets the tunnel up and the the tunnel works fine and it is possible
to ping6 www.kame.net and also access it via the http proxy. but tspc
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 05:10:22PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
The issue I'm seeing, seconds after launching gnome-terminal,
gnome-terminal terminal completely froze. I can move and resize the
window, but cannot kill or close it. A quick look at top shows:
38043 djp 200 21040K
Hi,
I have two PCs, with apparently a somewhat old
motherboard, since there's a maximum support for
UDMA66 by the harddisk controller.
The attached harddisks are newer and allow a
higher speed of UDMA100.
This combination of older motherboard and newer
harddisk causes great problems with 5.X
Hello.
I have an Atheros PCI card in my firewall/gateway machine.
It seems fully configured because the clients see a good strong signal
but I can't get a dhcp lease from it. I'm not bothering with WEP just yet.
I followed the instructions found here:
Hello.
I have an Atheros PCI card in my firewall/gateway machine.
It seems fully configured because the clients see a good strong signal
but I can't get a dhcp lease from it. I'm not bothering with WEP just yet.
I followed the instructions found here:
sio5: 1 more silo overflow (total 7)
puc0: VScom PCI-200L port
0xb000-0xb007,0xb400-0xb407,0xb800-0xb807,0xd000-0xd007 mem
0xea80-0xea80003f irq 14 at device 12.0 on pci2
sio4: configured irq 14 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0x8000
sio4: type 16550A
sio5: configured irq 14 not in bitmap
Rob,
I am currently running 5.3 Release on a Tyan Trinity 400 (VIA 82C596B
UDMA66) with 2 x Seagate Barracude IV (UDMA100) and have no stability
issues. e.g from dmesg:
atapci0: VIA 82C596B UDMA66 controller port
0xe000-0xe00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0:
Hello -stable:
Any idea(s) why (my) 5.3-stable (as of 9 February) isn't
configuring the network interface or setting up the default route?
I installed 5.3-release from CD and things worked fine.
Then I updated the system sources (via cvsup) to RELENG_5 and
went through
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:00:39 -0500 (EST)
Kenneth W Cochran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello -stable:
Any idea(s) why (my) 5.3-stable (as of 9 February) isn't
configuring the network interface or setting up the default route?
I installed 5.3-release from CD and things worked fine.
Then I
48 matches
Mail list logo
