okay. i am getting a serious stomach ache. i am looking at this page:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
and my head is spinning. i don't feel good. i am halfway thru doing
something or other sorta the wrong way. right now i got a prompt.. i
am
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 09:26, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
okay. i am getting a serious stomach ache. i am looking at this page:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
and my head is spinning. i don't feel good. i am halfway thru doing
something or other
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Is anyone looking into merging in the patch available at:
http://www.ualberta.ca/~cdjones/cdjones_jail_soc2006.patch
That provides both memory and cpu limits on a jail? It appears to be against
REL_6 from last years SOC ...
Is anyone using it in
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:28:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:28:50 - starting RELENG_6_2 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:28:50 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_2
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:28:50 - ERROR: /home/gnn/RELENG_6_2/amd64/amd64: File
exists
TB
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/i386/pc98
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 -
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - starting RELENG_6_1 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/i386/pc98
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-04-18
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/i386
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/i386/i386
TB --- 2007-04-18
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/amd64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-04-18
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - starting RELENG_6_1 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/i386
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/i386/i386
TB --- 2007-04-18
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - starting RELENG_6_1 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/amd64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/amd64/amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/sparc64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:54 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64
TB ---
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - starting RELENG_6_1 tinderbox run for
sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/sparc64
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/sparc64/sparc64
TB
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6/alpha
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:53 -
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - tinderbox 2.3 running on sobu.neville-neil.com
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - starting RELENG_6_1 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1
TB --- 2007-04-18 09:26:52 - mkdir /home/gnn/RELENG_6_1/alpha
TB --- 2007-04-18
I have Acer laptop with the Atheros card, identified as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x02 card=0x04181468 chip=0x001a168c rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
Corresponding dmesg lines are
ath0:
Dear All,
After recent cvsup and make world, my server suffered from the
bge watchdog timeout -- resetting problem. Manually revert the
bge related source to older version and compiled a new kernel
may solve the problem. So I guess the recent committed source
does not go well with bge nics
On 12/23/-58 20:59, zen wrote:
i don't have a problem with this but i am going to be setting up a
similar setup and would appreciate the help a working setup would
provide.
any help will be appreciated, i could use a sample configuration file
regarding this problem.
zen others,
building a
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What address is visible to whom? And
which address do you want to 'hide'? If you don't want to leak your
internal
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What address is visible to whom? And
which address do you want to
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 17:38 +0800, Jason Chang 張傑生 wrote:
Dear All,
After recent cvsup and make world, my server suffered from the
bge watchdog timeout -- resetting problem. Manually revert the
bge related source to older version and compiled a new kernel
may solve the problem. So I guess
On 4/18/07, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 17:38 +0800, Jason Chang 張傑生 wrote:
Dear All,
After recent cvsup and make world, my server suffered from the
bge watchdog timeout -- resetting problem. Manually revert the
bge related source to older version and compiled a
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:25:32PM +0200, Volker wrote:
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What
I currently have a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 SMP with dual intel PRO/1000PM
nics configured as follows:
em0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU
inet 192.168.0.18 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether
Hi,
since I need to use some installations of FreeBSD 4 for a while I'd like
to know:
Is there any special tag available for checking out the last usable
ports tree?
By accident I discovered the tag RELEASE_4_EOL on some files. Is this
vaild for all ports or only some (not shown in the webcvs)?
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
Hi,
since I need to use some installations of FreeBSD 4 for a while I'd like
to know:
Is there any special tag available for checking out the last usable
ports tree?
By accident I discovered the tag RELEASE_4_EOL on some files. Is this
vaild for all ports or only some
Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2007, 01:05 +0200 schrieb Gabor Kovesdan:
Marc Santhoff schrieb:
Hi,
since I need to use some installations of FreeBSD 4 for a while I'd like
to know:
Is there any special tag available for checking out the last usable
ports tree?
By accident I
Hi,
after cvsup'ing to RELEASE_4_EOL compiling accessibility/atk does not
work:
# make clean all
=== Cleaning for pkg-config-0.21
=== Cleaning for glib-2.12.9
=== Cleaning for gmake-3.81_1
=== Cleaning for libtool-1.5.22_2
=== Cleaning for icu-3.6
=== Cleaning for gettext-0.14.5_2
===
On 19/04/2007, at 9:05 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
RELEASE_4_EOL is the tag where the 4.X support was not yet removed.
We only started to remove the 4.X support after the tag, thus you
should still be able to build ports from the tag on 4.X.
My installations use portsnap and so
Hi list,
we've got a Asus DRW-1814BLT here which is not recognized by 6.2. I
can't find it neither in dmesg nor in atacontrol. The Bios detects it
fine and even Linux. This writer is SATA:
http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2model=1488l1=6l2=35l3=0
The device is connected to:
atapci0:
how in the werld did i manage to remove myself from wheel. i just
ran mergemaster -p
is there any documentation for that command that would explain
the complex nonsense ..
well.. maybe i just freeked out. still.. i followed instructions..
granted somebody told me a different procedure (that i
Volker wrote:
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What address is visible to whom? And
which
Adrian Chadd wrote:
A little birdie has told me that this mode of transparent
client-spoofing is possible with FreeBSD with a little kernel hackery
(much less than whats needed for TPROXY.)
Maybe someone who knows the code better than I could comment on how
difficult it'd be to add in
John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
See attached URL. This is a Screenshot of GNOME 2.18 on my Dell 5100
Laptop.
http://www.borgsdemons.com/images/Screenshot.png
It looks like the problem with font size / monitor DPI still isn't
solved. (the fonts on a bare-bones Linux Gnome desktop are bigger
On 19/04/07, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there is any such thing , i'm willing to be a tester .
i will deploy it on my server and enviroment ( live one)
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19/04/07, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there is any such thing , i'm willing to be a tester .
i will deploy it on my server and enviroment ( live one)
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
i'm glad to
Hi the following occurs when trying to make buildworld once cvsup'd to
stable, any idea's?
Environment:
FreeBSD xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 6.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 #1: Wed Apr 18
10:29:35 WST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] :/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/PHEONIX
amd64
Description:
ld -dc -r -o
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:35:21AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 19/04/2007, at 9:05 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
RELEASE_4_EOL is the tag where the 4.X support was not yet removed.
We only started to remove the 4.X support after the tag, thus you
should still be able to build ports
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Hi,
after cvsup'ing to RELEASE_4_EOL compiling accessibility/atk does not
work:
# make clean all
=== Cleaning for pkg-config-0.21
=== Cleaning for glib-2.12.9
=== Cleaning for gmake-3.81_1
=== Cleaning for
38 matches
Mail list logo
