On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:24:49PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
cc: --export-dynamic: linker input file unused because linking not done
But of course, it's just a harmless informative message.
The -Wl,--export-dynamic should be in LDFLAGS, not CFLAGS. There's
no guarantee that CFLAGS is passed to the
- Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/29/08, ZsUM ZsUM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Dump header from device /dev/ad4s1b
Architecture: amd64
Architecture Version: 2
Dump Length: 253394944B (241 MB)
Blocksize: 512
Dumptime: Sun Jan 20 23:51:58 2008
Hostname:
Magic:
Hi Jeremy,
I'm very glad that you a) can write! b) that you are actually doing
something with respect to the zillions of missguided how-to's :-)
Having some experience with the subject, and please, don't read me
wrong, I see some different approaches:
- indeed this IS the 21'st
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 12:06 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:50:43PM -0500, Ed Maste wrote:
iv. Knowledge of how TFTP and DHCP work, and how to debug them if
they break,
v. Intricate knowledge of configuring a DHCP server (common
question: what's
Greetings,
I want to know what is the bad effect of increasing HZ too much?
And when is too much? What problems can I expect when HZ2000?
Can I change this value without pre-compiling the kernel?
Because all docs I found for HZ is in src/sys/conf/NOTES and it doesn't
say much.
How can I know
I want to know what is the bad effect of increasing HZ too much?
And when is too much? What problems can I expect when HZ2000?
Can I change this value without pre-compiling the kernel?
You can set kern.hz in /boot/loader.conf
Robin P. Blanchard
Systems
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 01:21:06 am Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Since updating to 6.3-RELEASE on two machines I see this message a
lot.
Hooray I am not alone!
I have a thread in stable called ' kldstat causes kernel to print odd
message' (not
On Friday 25 January 2008 05:31:34 pm Joe Peterson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, when I look at that graph using schedgraphy from HEAD it just looks
like xtrs is using up all the CPU.
Yeah, xtrs is eating a lot of CPU, but I've never seen this affect the
mouse movement (making it really
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:01:40AM -0500, Robin Blanchard wrote:
I just inherited a remote 4.8 box...Having not used RELENG_4 in eons,
just wanted to check if it's safe to live upgrade (make
installworld/kernel ; mergemaster) directly to 4.11 (world/kernel
already built; waiting to install).
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:01:40AM -0500, Robin Blanchard wrote:
I just inherited a remote 4.8 box...Having not used RELENG_4 in eons,
just wanted to check if it's safe to live upgrade (make
installworld/kernel ; mergemaster) directly to 4.11
I just inherited a remote 4.8 box...Having not used RELENG_4 in eons,
just wanted to check if it's safe to live upgrade (make
installworld/kernel ; mergemaster) directly to 4.11 (world/kernel
already built; waiting to install). /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to
indicate this is out of the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I want to know what is the bad effect of increasing HZ too much?
And when is too much? What problems can I expect when HZ2000?
Can I change this value without pre-compiling the kernel?
You can change HZ by adding a
cpghost wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I want to know what is the bad effect of increasing HZ too much?
And when is too much? What problems can I expect when HZ2000?
Can I change this value without pre-compiling the kernel?
You can change
After some poking into psm.c code I've got some results.
First, for the archives, debug.psm.loglevel tunable is much more useful
than a verbose boot for debugging PS/2 mouse issues. A good value is 2.
Second, I fiddled with various probe methods to force them to
recognize my mouse (by loosening
cpghost wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I want to know what is the bad effect of increasing HZ too much?
And when is too much? What problems can I expect when HZ2000?
Can I change this value without pre-compiling the kernel?
You can change
Greetings,
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
cpghost wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I want to know what is the bad effect of increasing HZ too much?
And when is too much? What problems can I expect when HZ2000?
Can I change this value without
If you import and export more than one zpool FreeBSD will panic during
shutdown. This bug is present in both RELENG_7 and RELENG_7_0 (I have
not tested CURRENT).
kgdb output:
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...2 1 0 0 done
All buffers synced.
vput: negative ref count
0xc2ad1aa0: tag ufs, type
I'm not clear about which version of ZFS code is in FreeBSD, and whether the
free space map bug is present there or not. Does anyone know which ZFS is in
FreeBSD?
Anyways, if you really need the data, it might be possible to boot the newest version of OpenSolaris, and let it repair your
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
After some poking into psm.c code I've got some results.
First, for the archives, debug.psm.loglevel tunable is much more useful
than a verbose boot for debugging PS/2 mouse issues. A good value is 2.
Second, I fiddled with
[...reposting to freebsd-stable - no response on freebsd-fs]
I had a strange thing happen on ZFS the other day, and I cannot find any
info about it on the web - thought you might have some ideas. I am
using 7.0-RC1 at the moment.
I found a checksum error in ZFS during a scrub. This is strange
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:15:47PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:14:33AM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 11:44 +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
I've noticed (with
The problem is as follows:
1. put udf_load=YES in loader.conf
2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
4. now mount udf fs while udf.ko is unloaded
5. udf is auto loaded and fs is mounted
6. unmount fs
7. try to kldunload udf
on 30/01/2008 19:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The problem is as follows:
1. put udf_load=YES in loader.conf
2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
4. now mount udf fs while udf.ko is unloaded
5. udf is auto loaded and fs
Greetings,
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 30/01/2008 19:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The problem is as follows:
1. put udf_load=YES in loader.conf
2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
4. now mount udf fs while udf.ko is
I am using FreeBSD 6.2. I am trying to export a directory so that another
machine can read and write to it.
With an /etc/exports file that says:
/Data 192.168.1.20(rw)
I get an empty directory on the client machine.
I know that there are files in the directory. They show when I list the
Read the exports(5) manpage. Its format is different on FreeBSD than it
is on Linux. (rw) isn't valid.
Pay particular attention to the section about maproot. In the
absence of -maproot and -mapall options, remote accesses by root will
result in using a credential of -2:-2. So if you mounted
Hi,
not sure if this is a problem, but:
# sysctl -a | grep witness
debug.witness.child_cnt: 161
debug.witness.child_free_cnt: 3935
debug.witness.sleep_cnt: 235
debug.witness.spin_cnt: 0
debug.witness.free_cnt: 789
debug.witness.skipspin: 1
debug.witness.trace: 1
debug.witness.kdb: 1
Eirik Øverby wrote:
# sysctl debug.witness.watch=1
debug.witness.watch: 0
sysctl: debug.witness.watch: Invalid argument
Am I supposed to be able to turn witness off runtime, but not back on
again?
Yes, that is working as designed. Witness needs to run continuously to
track state.
Kris
So I need to reboot. Brilliant :) And I thought I was being clever...
Using WITNESS to try and help figuring out why bge is crapping out on
me all the time, but with WITNESS it's been stable, but oh-so-slow :P
/Eirik
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Eirik Øverby wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220
controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare.
I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, while
keeping all other parameters exactly the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven Hartland writes:
From: Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220
controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare.
I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, while
keeping all
- Original Message -
From: Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What *exactly* do you mean by
machine still locks up with no activity for anywhere from 20 to 30 seconds.
Is there disk activity? (e.g. activity light(s) flashing if you have them)
Cant tell if there is disk activity its in a DC
The plot thickens This stall is not just related to newfs you have to
have gstat running as well. If I do the newfs without gstat running then
no stall occurs. As soon as Im running gstat while doing the newfs then
everything locks as described.
Running truss on gstat shows the issue / cause
What *exactly* do you mean by
machine still locks up with no activity for anywhere from 20 to 30 seconds.
Is there disk activity? (e.g. activity light(s) flashing if you have them)
Cant tell if there is disk activity its in a DC miles away ;)
Does top continue to update the
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Baldwin wrote:
I tried #ifdef'ing out link_elf.c but it panicd my machine on boot
and I haven't had time to find out why.
The kernel is a link_elf type object I believe, so you have to have
it.
Ahah..
No easy answer there then :)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and
John Baldwin wrote:
It is printed whenever a kernel module is loaded.
The modules load OK. Nothing special or different about them.
...
The kernel is a link_elf type object I believe, so you have to have it.
That follows (I was reading this the other day 'cause we don't support
- Hugo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not clear about which version of ZFS code is in FreeBSD, and
whether the free space map bug is present there or not. Does anyone
know which ZFS is in FreeBSD?
Anyways, if you really need the data, it might be possible to boot
the newest
37 matches
Mail list logo
