On 15/12/2007, Hugo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugo Silva wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:15:04PM +, Hugo Silva wrote:
Hello list,
Just wanted to report another issue with BETA4 on my laptop.
The wireless connection is working without encryption
Sorry, The subject should be system time, not system.
On 6/16/08, Yi Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I found the system time is incorrect. After changing it, about 5
hours skipped.
My question is: Will portsnap update the changes of ports in these 5 hours?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Today I found the system time is incorrect. After changing it, about 5
hours skipped.
My question is: Will portsnap update the changes of ports in these 5 hours?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Wang Yi
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 02:28:37PM +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
Today I found the system time is incorrect. After changing it, about 5
hours skipped.
My question is: Will portsnap update the changes of ports in these 5 hours?
It shouldn't be a problem. If you want to be sure, just reboot the
box
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Sometimes my FreeBSD 7 machine becomes semi-dead: all network sttack
is working (pingable, etc), all LIVE processes are live, but it is
impossible to create new (and, it seems, EXIT finished) process.
It is SCHED_ULE
It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote on Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 10:22:26PM +0100:
Jakub Siroky wrote:
I've just confirmed the same situation on 6.2-RELEASE amd64/GENERIC. I
did not noticed it before because I started using ext2fs extensively
some months ago.
Regards,
Jakub
On Sat, 19 Jan
Stef Walter wrote:
I've been trying to track down a deadlock on some newish production
servers running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2. The deadlock occurs on a
specific (although mundane) hardware configuration, and each of several
servers running this hardware deadlock about once per week.
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I have computer in state,
when 4 iozone processes are hanged in Disk wait state, and I can not
cd to filesystem, which is tested by iozone.
But I can create processes, work on system, etc., if I don't touch this
filesystem.
No, the hald is not running, I suppose it's the reason.
hald not running? I had the same problem when using Gentoo.
HTH,
Sorin.
Pallt wrote:
Hi!
The version of the freebsd is 7.0-stable(June 9 2008), and the gnome was
also updated to 2.22.2.
But, I can not lock the screen, when I
Kris Kennaway wrote on Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:27:53AM +0200:
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote on Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 10:22:26PM +0100:
Jakub Siroky wrote:
I've just confirmed the same situation on 6.2-RELEASE amd64/GENERIC. I
did not noticed it before because I started using
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote on Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:27:53AM +0200:
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote on Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 10:22:26PM +0100:
Jakub Siroky wrote:
I've just confirmed the same situation on 6.2-RELEASE amd64/GENERIC. I
did not noticed it before
Hi folks;
I have acquired a rackmount Intel server with a RAID card in it that appears
to be compatable with the MFI driver.
To put it mildly, this thing SMOKES! It is SCREAMING fast. Insane, in
fact.
Ok, enough supurlatives.
Now the question is this - exactly what board(s) will this
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:30:01AM +0100, Pete French wrote:
I assume SCSI is the best path forward (either SA/SCSI or traditional) but
have been out of the loop on the card(s) that work properly for a good long
while.
HP P400 cards are PCI express and SAS - they work very well under
13 matches
Mail list logo
