Re: Panic in RELENG_7_1 with fxp(4)

2009-01-06 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:19:26AM -0600, Brandon Weisz wrote: Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:16:58PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Jan 3, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Brandon Weisz wrote: After running 7-PRERELEASE from around November 25th, I upgraded today to

Re: TCP packet out-of-order problem

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote: I thought that the system auto-tune improperly in this case. Hmm. Do you have a custom setting for kern.ipc.nmbclusters in loader.conf or sysctl.conf? What does kern.ipc.nmbclusters configure itself to on your system? Also, could you send me

freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi, I'm not sure where to post this, I had trouble finding a suitable mailing-list. Please point me in the right direction, if this is the wrong place to post this message. First off, I love the binary update tool for FreeBSD. It is an excellent tool, and saves a lot of time and trouble

Re: 7.1 Live Filesystem CD

2009-01-06 Thread Ken Smith
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:53 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: Is the Live Filesystem CD supposed to be bootable? 7.0's was but I can't get the 7.1 disc to boot. It works fine if I boot from CD 1 and then switch. Yes, it's supposed to be bootable. Works for me. Which architecture? --

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi Stefan. Yes, I am also noticing this. Luckily interrupting it and starting it again resumes. Judging from the speed of http://www.daemonology.net/ (hosted on same site), the freebsd-update server must be absolutely hammered. On Jan 6, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Stefan Miklosovic wrote: Hi,

Re: HEADS UP: snd_hda MFC plan

2009-01-06 Thread Alexander Motin
Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org (from Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:13:58 +0200): On most systems having several devices is not a problem, as mostly used analog connectors are usually detected first. But on some systems (for example, having separate HDMI ports on

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Henrik Schewe
Hello! Usually an update with FreeBSD-update is quite quick, but today and yesterday it has just been to slow to use, after two days of trying - I've still not completed a single upgrade. This also goes for portsnap. Portsnap is also an excellent tool, but the experience from using it could be

Re: 7.1 Live Filesystem CD

2009-01-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:48:56AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:53 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: Is the Live Filesystem CD supposed to be bootable? 7.0's was but I can't get the 7.1 disc to boot. It works fine if I boot from CD 1 and then switch. Yes, it's supposed

Re: 7.1 Live Filesystem CD

2009-01-06 Thread Martin
Am Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:48:56 -0500 schrieb Ken Smith kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu: On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:53 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: Is the Live Filesystem CD supposed to be bootable? 7.0's was but I can't get the 7.1 disc to boot. It works fine if I boot from CD 1 and then switch.

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Regarding portsnap in my previous post, I think you misunderstood me. This is not a new one time problem regarding a specific case, portsnap is allways slow. This is observed from heavy usage of it, over a long period of time. Great to see

ACPI support?

2009-01-06 Thread Krassimir Slavchev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I have had a problem detecting the network card on my notebook when ACPI is enabled for a year. The problem still exists in 7.1-RELEASE. with ACPI: ... bge0: Broadcom NetLink Gigabit Ethernet Controller, ASIC rev. 0xb002 irq 17 at device

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Christopher Arnold
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Daniel Bond wrote: I'm not sure where to post this, I had trouble finding a suitable mailing-list. Please point me in the right direction, if this is the wrong place to post this message. I think freebsd-ports would have been the place. Yesterday I was struck by

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Christopher Arnold
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Daniel Bond wrote: Regarding portsnap in my previous post, I think you misunderstood me. This is not a new one time problem regarding a specific case, portsnap is allways slow. This is observed from heavy usage of it, over a long period of time. This is not my

Re: 7.1 Live Filesystem CD

2009-01-06 Thread Julian Stacey
Hi, Reference: From: Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:43:23 +0100 Message-id: 20090106094323.ga98...@owl.midgard.homeip.net Erik Trulsson wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:48:56AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:53 -0800,

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi again Christopher, reading your answer, you are obviously confusing what I am saying about freebsd-update with the portsnap program. Also, I also wrote in my first post that HTTP_PROXY / Caching proxy server does not help me much. This is because I download a lot of initial tarball

Re: HEADS UP: snd_hda MFC plan

2009-01-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org (from Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:25:01 +0200): Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org (from Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:13:58 +0200): On most systems having several devices is not a problem, as mostly used analog connectors are usually

Re: TCP packet out-of-order problem

2009-01-06 Thread Lin Jui-Nan Eric
Oops, we surely have kern.ipc.nmbclusters=0 in loader.conf, but I think that should not modify net.inet.tcp.reass.maxsegments to 0 since we wish unlimited nmbclusters but not zero TCP reassembly segments. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan

Re: Panic in RELENG_7_1 with fxp(4)

2009-01-06 Thread Brandon Weisz
Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:19:26AM -0600, Brandon Weisz wrote: Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:16:58PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Jan 3, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Brandon Weisz wrote: After running 7-PRERELEASE from around November 25th, I

RE: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-06 Thread Brian Duke
This is very odd. I got desperate last night and steeled myself for a reinstall. Copied all the known keeper files to an alternate drive including /home, /etc, /usr/local/etc and a couple others. It's on a completely separate drive with no OS just files on it. I downloaded what I thought was 7.1

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Christopher Arnold
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Daniel Bond wrote: reading your answer, you are obviously confusing what I am saying about freebsd-update with the portsnap program. Also, I also wrote in my first post No i'm not confusing them, just trying to follow two subjects at the same time. Sorry if that is

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
The same could be said about CVSup, one could write a caching cvsup proxy-server, and then we could just get rid of all the other cvsup- servers, except two (like freebsd-update soon will have). The point is, for portsnap and freebsd-update to scale properly, it needs to be opened up to the

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:31:48AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote: This is very odd. I got desperate last night and steeled myself for a reinstall. Copied all the known keeper files to an alternate drive including /home, /etc, /usr/local/etc and a couple others. It's on a completely separate drive

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Vincent Hoffman
Daniel Bond wrote: The same could be said about CVSup, one could write a caching cvsup proxy-server, and then we could just get rid of all the other cvsup-servers, except two (like freebsd-update soon will have). The point is, for portsnap and freebsd-update to scale properly, it needs to be

RE: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-06 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:31 -0700, Brian Duke wrote: This is very odd. I got desperate last night and steeled myself for a reinstall. Copied all the known keeper files to an alternate drive including /home, /etc, /usr/local/etc and a couple others. It's on a completely separate drive with no

Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following. Merged /head/sys:r182080,182467-182469,182883-182884,183573,183603-183605, 183828,183830-183834,184212-184213,184263,184373-184375 There are really too many

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2009-01-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2009-01-06 17:43:24 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-01-06 17:43:24 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2009-01-06 17:43:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:44:17 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:44:17 -

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2009-01-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2009-01-06 17:45:35 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-01-06 17:45:35 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2009-01-06 17:45:35 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:46:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:46:00 -

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2009-01-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2009-01-06 17:43:25 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-01-06 17:43:25 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2009-01-06 17:43:25 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:44:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:44:20 -

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2009-01-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2009-01-06 17:41:34 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-01-06 17:41:34 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2009-01-06 17:41:34 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:42:15 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-01-06 17:42:15 -

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi, thanks for useful and relevant information. However, this is just one part of the process. Generating the diffs, prepping the server, and the whole server-side setup/management of it is another - I am sure there are tools for this too. Cheers, Daniel. On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:30 PM,

Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel

2009-01-06 Thread Royce Williams
Daniel Bond wrote, on 1/6/2009 10:16 AM: thanks for useful and relevant information. However, this is just one part of the process. Generating the diffs, prepping the server, and the whole server-side setup/management of it is another - I am sure there are tools for this too.

FreeBSD Update slow right now, please be patient

2009-01-06 Thread Colin Percival
Hi all, FreeBSD Update is being slow right now due to server load issues. It will improve. Please be patient. -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid

Re: Samsung SCX-4200 printer

2009-01-06 Thread Roland Smith
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:23:54AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:26:23PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:44:03PM +0100, Erwan David wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:36:35PM CET, Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no said: On

Re: FreeBSD Update slow right now, please be patient

2009-01-06 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi Colin, is there anything I can do to help? Will this also resolve connect- issues close up to future releases? I had some correspondence with you about additional mirrors earlier, but it stopped (guessing too many similar requests, to answer them all). Cheers, Daniel. On Jan 6,

RE: Samsung SCX-4200 printer

2009-01-06 Thread SDH Support
Is there a way to install the SCX-4200 printer on a FreeBSD box ? I would recommend googling this printer and determining its support on linux first and then perhaps following the large amount of documentation with installing CUPS for freebsd. I've gotten many different printers working on my

Re: Samsung SCX-4200 printer

2009-01-06 Thread Peter C. Lai
What language does this printer use? I am a big fan of the minimalistic BSD LPD/R, so I usually just whip up an output filter that cats everything (since just about every app natively prints as postscript these days [besides gimp-app I guess]) to ghostscript. Works for basically any printer with

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:36:20 -0500 Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following. Merged /head/sys:r182080,182467-182469,182883-182884,183573,183603-183605,

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:36:20 -0500 Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the

Problem with CPU freq in 7.1-STABLE

2009-01-06 Thread Pierre-Luc Drouin
Hi, I noticed a problem with CPU freq in 7.1-STABLE. The maximum frequency showed by sysctl is 500Mhz lower than what it should be for my Pentium M 2Ghz. Here is the output from dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992,

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:57 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: I forgot to tell that I fixed the Makefile in sys/modules/drm/i915 manually. Apparently patch gets confuseed when it finds a file with the same name in the current directory (which was /usr/src), or

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: Is ther a secret handshake to make patch put the files in their correct place? (Except for reading through the whole patchfile to determine if all touched filews are in the same directory.) patch -p0

Re: ver 4.2 won't allow save because it can't see 2.2T disk drive

2009-01-06 Thread Tom Samplonius
- SDH Admin ad...@stardothosting.com wrote: I need to patch this until I can update the system, any pointers to where (if there is one) to get the patch for this, and installation instructions. What is the 2.2T disk formatted as? Can you give more details on your hardware (storage

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Bernt Hansson
Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-06 18:36: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 And what is DRM? My ATI HD 3870 works. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 12:36 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following. Merged /head/sys:r182080,182467-182469,182883-182884,183573,183603-183605,

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.net wrote: Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-06 18:36: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 And what is DRM? My ATI HD 3870 works. Digital Rights Management. See:

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 04:20 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-06 18:36: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 And what is DRM? My ATI HD 3870 works. drm being the direct rendering kernel modules, required for most hardware

Re: ver 4.2 won't allow save because it can't see 2.2T disk drive

2009-01-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Tom Samplonius t...@samplonius.org wrote: - SDH Admin ad...@stardothosting.com wrote: I need to patch this until I can update the system, any pointers to where (if there is one) to get the patch for this, and installation instructions. What is the 2.2T

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:13 -0500, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 12:36 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following. Merged

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:49 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.net wrote: Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-06 18:36: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 And what is DRM? My ATI HD 3870

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 02:17 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:57 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: I forgot to tell that I fixed the Makefile in sys/modules/drm/i915 manually. Apparently patch gets confuseed when it finds a file with

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 01:24 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:36:20 -0500 Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following. Merged

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Bernt Hansson
Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-07 04:52: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 04:20 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-06 18:36: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 And what is DRM? My ATI HD 3870 works. drm being the

mergemaster barf

2009-01-06 Thread Mike Lempriere
upgrading 5-stable (was at 5.5) to 6-stable, in preparation for 6-stable to 7-stable. No problems with cvsup, make buildworld, make buildkernel, mergemaster -p. make installkernel, boot to single user, then mergemaster -- blammo: config /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/mail/misc/mail.rc

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:09:58PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 02:17 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:57 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: I forgot to tell that I fixed the Makefile in sys/modules/drm/i915

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.net wrote: Robert Noland said the following on 2009-01-06 18:36: I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7 And what is DRM? My ATI HD 3870 works. Digital

Re: Pending MFC of drm updates

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 07:21 +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:09:58PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 02:17 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:57 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: I forgot to

Re: mergemaster barf

2009-01-06 Thread Doug Barton
Mike Lempriere wrote: upgrading 5-stable (was at 5.5) to 6-stable, in preparation for 6-stable ... usage: cap_mkdb [-v] [-f outfile] file [file ...] *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/etc. *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src/etc and install files to the temproot environment

Re: mergemaster barf

2009-01-06 Thread Andrei Kolu
Mike Lempriere wrote: upgrading 5-stable (was at 5.5) to 6-stable, in preparation for 6-stable to 7-stable. No problems with cvsup, make buildworld, make buildkernel, mergemaster -p. make installkernel, boot to single user, then mergemaster -- blammo: config