On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:32:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of src/ports on 2009-12-09) install of 8
seems to indicate that changes in SSL have made it virtually
unusable. I've spent the past 3 days attempting to (re)create an SSL
enabled virtual host that
Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of src/ports on 2009-12-09) install of 8 seems to
indicate
that changes in SSL have made it virtually unusable. I've spent the past 3 days
attempting to (re)create an SSL enabled virtual host that serves web based
access
to local mail. Since
First my apologies for breaking the thread.
We also had this issue and tried to find an acceptable solution.
To make a long story short:
Please try to compile your application against the version of openssl
available in the ports tree.
As you already mentioned (SA-09:15) breaks renegotiation
Hello!
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:32:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of src/ports on 2009-12-09) install of 8 seems to
indicate
that changes in SSL have made it virtually unusable. I've spent the past 3
days
attempting to (re)create an SSL enabled virtual
Greetings Clifton, and thank you for your reply.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 12:16 am, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:32:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of src/ports on 2009-12-09) install of 8
seems to indicate that changes in SSL have made it
Greetings Matthew, and thank you very much for your reply.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 12:33 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of src/ports on 2009-12-09) install of 8 seems to
indicate that changes in SSL have made it virtually unusable. I've spent the
Greetings, and thank you for taking the time to respond.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 12:58 am, H. Ingow wrote:
First my apologies for breaking the thread.
We also had this issue and tried to find an acceptable solution.
To make a long story short:
Please try to compile your application against
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:58:49AM +0100, H. Ingow wrote:
[...]
Please try to compile your application against the version of openssl
available in the ports tree.
As you already mentioned (SA-09:15) breaks renegotiation with base system's
openssl by fixing
a security issue ( it
Hello Maxim, and thank you for taking the time to reply.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 2:14 am, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:32:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of src/ports on 2009-12-09) install of 8 seems to
indicate that changes in SSL
On Sat, December 19, 2009 3:13 am, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:58:49AM +0100, H. Ingow wrote:
[...]
Please try to compile your application against the version of openssl
available in the ports tree.
As you already mentioned (SA-09:15) breaks renegotiation
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:18:21AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Hello Maxim, and thank you for taking the time to reply.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 2:14 am, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:32:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
A recent (cvs checkout of
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:23:57AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
On Sat, December 19, 2009 3:13 am, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:58:49AM +0100, H. Ingow wrote:
[...]
Please try to compile your application against the version of openssl
available in
Sorry if my proposal won't fit in this case and thanks, Maxim for
clearing out what exactly
to be aware of to have applications run with openssl .0.9.8l
But for the sake of completeness /usr/ports/security/tor-devel is very
well capable of handling
re-negotiation.
see src/common/tortls.c and
On 19/12/2009, at 11:29 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
No, my previous suggestion is unrelated.
Additionally, to re-enable renegotiation in openssl 0.9.8l you
need an application which is able to set
SSL3_FLAGS_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION in s-s3-flags. I
haven't seen any yet, and
Hello Maxim, and thank you again for your reply.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 3:54 am, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:18:21AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Hello Maxim, and thank you for taking the time to reply.
On Sat, December 19, 2009 2:14 am, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
Attempted clean kernel build, running
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #11 r200664: Fri
Dec 18 05:18:46 PST 2009
r...@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S2/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
[Immediately following a make buldworld...]
Kernel build for GENERIC
I looked in my stbale/8 sources for comparison and found the definition
of CPUID_TO_FAMILY in sys/i386/include/specialreg.h.
Here's a diff comparing the stable/7 vs. the stable/8 versions of that
file:
--- /usr/src/sys/i386/include/specialreg.h 2009-12-09 04:36:55.0
-0800
+++
On Sat, December 19, 2009 5:35 am, David Wolfskill wrote:
Attempted clean kernel build, running
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #11 r200664:
Fri
Dec 18 05:18:46 PST 2009
r...@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S2/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
[Immediately
On Sat, December 19, 2009 5:54 am, Chris H wrote:
On Sat, December 19, 2009 5:35 am, David Wolfskill wrote:
Attempted clean kernel build, running
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #11 r200664:
Fri
Dec 18 05:18:46 PST 2009
Hi folks, Im getting the following error when building world for
RELENG_8 using GENERIC.
Any ideas on how to skip that?
=== share/mklocale (all)
mklocale -o UTF-8.out /usr/src/share/mklocale/UTF-8.src
mklocale -o am_ET.UTF-8.out /usr/src/share/mklocale/am_ET.UTF-8.src
am_ET.UTF-8.out:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:05:33AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
...
Greetings,
What are the chances you made no declaration as to your CPU type in your
KERNCONF?
eg; 1386
Just for clarity; from /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:
machine i386
With respect, that is not
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 05:23:53AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
[...]
Indeed. I understand that. In fact my OP (original post) indicated my use was
in a vhost - eg;
NameVirtualHost host.ip.add.ress:443
VirtualHost host.ip.add.ress:443
SSLEnable
SSLVerifyClient (options 0-3;none work)
On 2009-12-19 15:42, Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
Hi folks, Im getting the following error when building world for
RELENG_8 using GENERIC.
Any ideas on how to skip that?
=== share/mklocale (all)
mklocale -o UTF-8.out /usr/src/share/mklocale/UTF-8.src
mklocale -o am_ET.UTF-8.out
Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote
in 2a41acea0912052327t7830f85aw5b4b581ab3f09...@mail.gmail.com:
jf The 82573, when onboard (LOM) is usually special, it is used by system
jf management
jf firmware. Go to the system BIOS and turn off management, see if that
jf eliminates the
jf periodic hang.
TB --- 2009-12-19 19:03:58 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2009-12-19 19:03:58 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2009-12-19 19:03:58 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2009-12-19 19:04:35 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2009-12-19 19:04:35 -
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:07:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:07:19 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:07:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:07:49 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:07:49 -
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:49:50 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:49:50 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:49:51 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:50:09 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2009-12-19 20:50:09 -
On Sat, December 19, 2009 9:31 am, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:05:33AM -0800, Chris H wrote:
...
Greetings,
What are the chances you made no declaration as to your CPU type in your
KERNCONF?
eg; 1386
Just for clarity; from /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:
On 12/19/09 08:35, David Wolfskill wrote:
Attempted clean kernel build, running
[ .. snip .. ]
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/mca.c:510: warning: implicit declaration of function
'CPUID_TO_FAMILY'
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/mca.c:510: warning: nested extern declaration of
'CPUID_TO_FAMILY'
Dear all,
Another quarter is soon to be finished and as such, I would like to
remind you to submit your status reports as soon as possible, because
the submissions for this quarter (covering period of Oct - Dec 2009) are
due by Janurary 15th, 2010.
I believe a lot of things have happened in
At 9:41 PM +0200 12/15/09, Alexander Motin wrote:
Looks like it was working first, until something happened. I've reread
all Promise related changes and don't see problem there. The only idea I
have is that it could be larger transfer, which was not used before. Try
to apply this patch to get
31 matches
Mail list logo
