Re: openldap client GSSAPI authentication segfaults in fbsd8stablei386

2010-07-18 Thread Reko Turja
Applying Benjamin's patch to RELENG_8 sources csupped yesterday stops the buildworld in last library stage: In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/clnt_dg.c:55: /usr/src/lib/libc/../../include/rpc/rpcsec_gss.h:52: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'gss_cred_id_t'

Re: openldap client GSSAPI authentication segfaults in fbsd8stablei386

2010-07-18 Thread Reko Turja
After manually changing the gssapi header used in /usr/src/include/rpc/rpcsec_gss.h to somewhat klunky #include /usr/src/crypto/heimdal/lib/gssapi/gssapi/gssapi.h system csupped yesterday built okay and after rebuilding cyrus-sasl, saslauthd and cyrus I get the following failures in log: Jul

Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2

2010-07-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:11:50AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 06:24:55PM +0300, Alex Kozlov wrote: After updating my buildbox from 26 April 8-STABLE to 8.1-RC2 I constantly getting SIGEPIPE portsnap: Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. Applying metadata

em(4) + ALTQ

2010-07-18 Thread Daryl Richards
I'm wondering what the status of this problem is.. Will the fixes be in 8.1-RELEASE? I've checked through everything since the initial reports in February, and haven't seen a definitive answer.. Thanks! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: openldap client GSSAPI authentication segfaults in fbsd8stablei386

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Lee
On 07/17/2010 03:37 PM, Reko Turja wrote: Can you try reproducing the issue on 8-STABLE? I recently submitted a Heimdal patch against 8.1-STABLE and 9.0-CURRENT that resolves some libgssapi-related issues: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/147454 The patch breaks ABI, so

Re: openldap client GSSAPI authentication segfaults in fbsd8stablei386

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Lee
On 07/18/2010 06:52 AM, Reko Turja wrote: After manually changing the gssapi header used in /usr/src/include/rpc/rpcsec_gss.h to somewhat klunky #include /usr/src/crypto/heimdal/lib/gssapi/gssapi/gssapi.h system csupped yesterday built okay and after rebuilding cyrus-sasl, saslauthd and cyrus

Reporting Functional Server Models

2010-07-18 Thread Sean Bruno
I spent some time last week validating the 7, 8 and -CURRENT on different vendor hardware over here in my lab. Is there a current h/w compatibility list that folks are maintaining that I can update with my findings? Sean ___

deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
On the serial console I see swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 74, size: 4096 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 128, size: 20480 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 69, size: 4096 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 6,

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 05:08:09PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: On the serial console I see swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 74, size: 4096 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 128, size: 20480 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 69,

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 05:14 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Where exactly is your swap partition? On one of the areca raidsets. # swapctl -l Device: 1024-blocks Used: /dev/da0s1b10485760 108 If you Google for swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj you'll find this is a pretty

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 05:42:14PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 05:14 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Where exactly is your swap partition? On one of the areca raidsets. # swapctl -l Device: 1024-blocks Used: /dev/da0s1b10485760 108 So is da0 actually a RAID

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 07:34:19PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Now I'm confused -- this indicates twa(4) is involved, not arcmsr(4). Can you please provide a verbose explanation of the configuration of the disks and controllers in this machine, including device and disk names and what

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:34 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 05:42:14PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 05:14 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Where exactly is your swap partition? On one of the areca raidsets. # swapctl -l Device: 1024-blocks Used: /dev/da0s1b

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:58 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I re-worked this out myself based on the OP's dmesg. It's confusing because there's literally 6 different storage controllers on a single machine: Its a big storage server. Some files dont require fast or frequent access, others do. The disks

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:01:03PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 10:34 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 05:42:14PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 05:14 PM 7/18/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Where exactly is your swap partition? On one of the areca raidsets.

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:34:24PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:01:03PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: I do track some basic mem stats via rrd. Looking at the graphs upto that period, nothing unusual was happening sysctl vm.stats.vm | grep swap Here's another

Re: deadlock or bad disk ? RELENG_8

2010-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:58:44PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I took a look at the RELENG_8 code responsible for printing this message: src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c [...] 1086 static int 1087 swap_pager_getpages(vm_object_t object, vm_page_t *m, int count, int reqpage) 1088 { [...] There