Hello All,
What could be the reason for the following failure?
ugen2.2: Sony at usbus2
umass0: Sony Sony DSC, class 0/0, rev 1.10/4.50, addr 2 on usbus2
umass0: RBC over CBI; quirks = 0x
umass0:1:0:-1: Attached to scbus1
(probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): AutoSense failed
This occurs on 4
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:35:56PM +0100, Harald Weis wrote:
What could be the reason for the following failure?
ugen2.2: Sony at usbus2
umass0: Sony Sony DSC, class 0/0, rev 1.10/4.50, addr 2 on usbus2
umass0: RBC over CBI; quirks = 0x
umass0:1:0:-1: Attached to scbus1
Is there a reason /sbin/reboot isn't assigned to the operator group or is
this an oversight?
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
In message aanlktind3uzu6o-gf5j1b7cxp7dr1+jqvzbi9vjym...@mail.gmail.com, Adam
Vande More writes:
Is there a reason /sbin/reboot isn't assigned to the operator group or is
this an oversight?
Why would you want it to be? One really shouldn't be running /sbin/reboot
directly as part of normal
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Why would you want it to be? One really shouldn't be running /sbin/reboot
directly as part of normal operations. shutdown does a graceful reboot if
and when operators need to perform reboot.
AFAIK, the only functional
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:35:51 -0600
From: Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Why would you want it to be? One really shouldn't be running /sbin/reboot
directly as part of
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 21:35, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Why would you want it to be? One really shouldn't be running /sbin/reboot
directly as part of normal operations. shutdown does a graceful reboot if
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Unlike reboot, shutdown attempts to cleanly stop all processes. Things
like databases can be badly damaged by a reboot. Other processes save
state when stopped and that is lost with a reboot.
For the correct order,
In message aanlktikggsyrlnds6oihw2u3syjezrrqwdsa9z4t7...@mail.gmail.com, Adam
Vande More writes:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Unlike reboot, shutdown attempts to cleanly stop all processes. Things
like databases can be badly damaged by a reboot.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 22:46, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
shutdown also give operator more possibilities than a clean shutdown some
which could be very bad.
I haven't thought about the situation in any detail, but nothing jumps
out at me from the manpage. You could do a denial
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
When you have administered multi-user systems you learn to do things
gracefully unless you actually need to do things abbruptly.
Yes I of course I use shutdown -r on a multi-user system in the rare times I
deal with one.
In article aanlktikggsyrlnds6oihw2u3syjezrrqwdsa9z4t7...@mail.gmail.com,
amvandem...@gmail.com writes:
For the correct order, shutdown -r calls reboot which calls init which
calls rc.shutdown.
No. shutdown(8) sends a SIGINT to init(8), which runs rc.shutdown and
then calls reboot(2) as its
12 matches
Mail list logo
