Hi,
as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right?
But when I define
WITH_PKGNG=yes
in /etc/make.conf
the ports-system wants to install the pkgng-package (because it looks
for pkgng in /usr/local/sbin).
Is there a way to say I have the pkg tool in base already?
Or is
Hi,
In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the system.
At this moment I'm running:
FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012
without problems.
Is it save to recompile the system with all patches?
Thanks
Jack Raats
On 27/12/2012 09:44, Rainer Duffner wrote:
as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right?
/usr/sbin/pkg and /usr/local/sbin/pkg are very different.
/usr/local/sbin/pkg is a binary package management system.
/usr/sbin/pkg is a shim that can bootstrap the installation of
On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 27/12/2012 09:44, Rainer Duffner wrote:
as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right?
/usr/sbin/pkg and /usr/local/sbin/pkg are very different.
/usr/local/sbin/pkg is a binary package management system.
/usr/sbin/pkg is
On 2012-12-27 11:35, David Demelier wrote:
On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
...
pkgng is not in base and there are no plans to import it. If you are
going to use pkgng then you need to install it, either from ports or by
using the /usr/sbin/pkg shim to install from a pkgng package.
Hello :-)
I have found some issues with 9.1-RC3 packages/configuration using
binary packages:
1. xorg-input-mouse is old driver (?) that has the issue mentioned on
the list (current?) - the mouse is not always detected at first xorg
run. Please make sure 9.1-RELEASE use new mouse driver that has
On a FreeBSD 8-Stable machine with UFS + GJOURNAL (no SU) I observed the
same behaviour as described for UFS+SU+J in
lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/030937.html.
The snapshot was initiated by amanda with
dump 3ubLshf 64 1048576 0 - /dev/mirror/gm0p10.journal (pid
On 27/12/2012 10:38, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-12-27 11:35, David Demelier wrote:
On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
pkgng is not in base and there are no plans to import it. If you are
going to use pkgng then you need to install it, either from ports or by
using the
[-questions@, as I'm not subscribed to it, and I don't see value in
cross-posting this message -- dhw]
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:53:23AM +0100, Jack Raats wrote:
Hi,
In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the system.
Well, I suspect that even if a small number of
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
On a FreeBSD 8-Stable machine with UFS + GJOURNAL (no SU) I observed the
same behaviour as described for UFS+SU+J in
lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/030937.html.
The snapshot was initiated by amanda
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Jack Raats j...@jarasoft.net wrote:
Hi,
In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the
system. At this moment I'm running:
FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012
without problems.
Is it save to
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012, CeDeROM wrote:
Hello :-)
I have found some issues with 9.1-RC3 packages/configuration using
binary packages:
1. xorg-input-mouse is old driver (?) that has the issue mentioned on
the list (current?) - the mouse is not always detected at first xorg
run. Please make sure
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
Konstantin Belousov
Sent: Saturday, 8 December 2012 12:01 PM
To: f...@freebsd.org
Cc: sta...@freebsd.org
Subject: nullfs changes MFC
Hi,
I am going to merge latest
Hello Warren :-)
I did so. I also talked about that problem some time ago. I think
1.7.2 xorg mouse driver has this fix and no manual configuration is
necessary. It would be nice to include 1.7.2 in the release packages
:-)
Best regards :-)
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Hi,
I'm creating my own repository and have created a key for it.
I've created a CSR for it and used that to generate a certificate via
our internal CA. Because there was no other information available, I
used the profile that we use to generate SSL-certificates for web
servers.
I copied the
There is nothing going into release what was not in ports
tree. (There is no release packages at all, apart from ports
that's just happened to be in regular tree at release time.
Followed by port tree slush.)
xf86-input-mouse-1.8.1 is in dev trunk xorg tree. (see -x11).
--
View this message
Is ORAC some kind of patchset? Unless you see flow of tinderbox errors,
-STABLE is buildable almost always.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-1-PRERELEASE-tp5772515p5772627.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
On a FreeBSD 8-Stable machine with UFS + GJOURNAL (no SU) I observed the
same behaviour as described for UFS+SU+J in
lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/030937.html.
The
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
On a FreeBSD 8-Stable machine with UFS + GJOURNAL (no SU) I observed the
same behaviour as described for UFS+SU+J in
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm creating my own repository and have created a key for it.
I've created a CSR for it and used that to generate a certificate via
our internal CA. Because there was no other information available, I
used the
In article 20121227162311$6...@grapevine.csail.mit.edu,
rai...@ultra-secure.de writes:
I'm creating my own repository and have created a key for it.
[...]
What does pkg expect to be in this file?
A public key. It does not use X.509 (nor is there any reason why it
should, although I suppose it
2012/12/26 Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com:
I've revised the patch again and updated it at gihub,
https://gist.github.com/4362018. It can now be applied at top level
of sources (/usr/src typically). It now does the deconfiguration in
reverse order of the configuration, meaning the aliases
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 06:02:33PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE
or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me...
I assume it does not look like release is the lack
of packages.
What you are seeing is behind-the-scenes preparation.
The release is official
23 matches
Mail list logo
