[Bug 194534] [freebsd-update] upgrade from FreeBSD-10-RELEASE to FreeBSD-10.1RC2 system fail to boot.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194534 Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout --- Comment #4 from Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org --- I am unsure if this is still an issue, given the feedback provided, however 10.1-RC2 is no longer supported, and several freebsd-update(8) ENs have been issued since the 10.1-RELEASE to address several issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.X+ securelevel=2 S.M.A.R.T.?
Todor Todorov wrote this message on Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:50 +0300: I know it's not a new topic but still did not find a proper solution. As all know starting from 9.X branch the disk access is changed and using securelevel=2 breaks the smartmontools to get disk health status. Is there a way to keep both security and functionality as in previous releases? Any ideas, articles, guides? Per the securelevel man page: 2 Highly secure mode - same as secure mode, plus disks may not be opened for writing (except by mount(2)) whether mounted or not. smartmontools uses a special passthrough mode of the disk to send custom commands to the disk... If the passthrough mode is allowed in this level, then smartmontools could write to the disk violating the guarantee that disks may not be written to in multiuser mode... This is probably a result of the switch from the old ata framework to now where ata is part of the cam framework... I'd say that the fact smartmontools worked pre 9.x is a bug... You might want to look at the MAC framework[1] where you can have finer grained control of what is allowed and disallowed on your system if you care this much about security... [1] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mac.html -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #252 - Failure
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #252 - Failure: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/252/ to view the results. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:38:18PM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: 2015-07-01 13:38 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. Hi, Is there a way the external SAT solver functionality can be memory optimised? When trying to use this feature having +750 packages installed, the memory usage starts growing and growing beyond 4GBytes until PKG segfaults, even before the CNF export has started. env SAT_SOLVER=mysolver pkg upgrade Probably, but given the little amount of time pkg developers has we will greatly appreciate patches :) AKA this would be greatly appreciated, but very low on the priority list :( Best regards, Bapt Hijacking this, I managed to mess up my local pkg repo somehow. I build my own set of packages, and typically do pkg upgrade on the clients. This time, I tried pkg upgrade -F, which went and downloaded everything and that's fine. But now when I run pkg upgrade it claims everything is already updated? root@coyote:~# pkg --version 1.5.4 root@coyote:~# pkg upgrade Updating acme repository catalogue... acme repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (68 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (68 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. So let's try brute forcing this: root@coyote:~# pkg install `pkg info -aqo` Updating acme repository catalogue... acme repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. databases/db48 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db5? [Y/n]: Y Assertion failed: (0), function pkg_jobs_try_remote_candidate, file pkg_jobs.c, line 821. Child process pid=60776 terminated abnormally: Abort trap Exit 250 Using more force: root@coyote:~# pkg upgrade -f db48 Updating acme repository catalogue... acme repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. db48 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db5? [Y/n]: y pkg: sqlite error while executing UPDATE packages SET name=?1 WHERE name=?2; in file pkg_jobs.c:1658: UNIQUE constraint failed: packages.name The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: db5: 4.8.30.0_2 - 5.3.28_2 The process will require 37 MiB more space. 12 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y Fetching db5-5.3.28_2.txz: 100% 12 MiB 6.4MB/s00:02 Checking integrity...Assertion failed: (strcmp(uid, p-uid) != 0), function pkg_conflicts_check_local_path, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 368. Child process pid=60922 terminated abnormally: Abort trap Exit 250 the -debug output has nothing of interest that I can see. What's up? Please open a ticket with this and save your /var/db/pkg/* somewhere so we can analyze (and send them to me or host them in a place when I can fetch them) in the meantime what you should do is pkg upgrade -f (lower f) and say no to everything that ask you to switch candidates Best regards, Bapt pgpKCbT7Og8t3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out
2015-07-01 13:38 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. Hi, Is there a way the external SAT solver functionality can be memory optimised? When trying to use this feature having +750 packages installed, the memory usage starts growing and growing beyond 4GBytes until PKG segfaults, even before the CNF export has started. env SAT_SOLVER=mysolver pkg upgrade Probably, but given the little amount of time pkg developers has we will greatly appreciate patches :) AKA this would be greatly appreciated, but very low on the priority list :( Best regards, Bapt Hijacking this, I managed to mess up my local pkg repo somehow. I build my own set of packages, and typically do pkg upgrade on the clients. This time, I tried pkg upgrade -F, which went and downloaded everything and that's fine. But now when I run pkg upgrade it claims everything is already updated? root@coyote:~# pkg --version 1.5.4 root@coyote:~# pkg upgrade Updating acme repository catalogue... acme repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (68 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (68 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. So let's try brute forcing this: root@coyote:~# pkg install `pkg info -aqo` Updating acme repository catalogue... acme repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. databases/db48 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db5? [Y/n]: Y Assertion failed: (0), function pkg_jobs_try_remote_candidate, file pkg_jobs.c, line 821. Child process pid=60776 terminated abnormally: Abort trap Exit 250 Using more force: root@coyote:~# pkg upgrade -f db48 Updating acme repository catalogue... acme repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. db48 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db5? [Y/n]: y pkg: sqlite error while executing UPDATE packages SET name=?1 WHERE name=?2; in file pkg_jobs.c:1658: UNIQUE constraint failed: packages.name The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: db5: 4.8.30.0_2 - 5.3.28_2 The process will require 37 MiB more space. 12 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y Fetching db5-5.3.28_2.txz: 100% 12 MiB 6.4MB/s00:02 Checking integrity...Assertion failed: (strcmp(uid, p-uid) != 0), function pkg_conflicts_check_local_path, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 368. Child process pid=60922 terminated abnormally: Abort trap Exit 250 the -debug output has nothing of interest that I can see. What's up? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #253 - Fixed
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #253 - Fixed: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/253/ to view the results. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
sdhci_pci0-slot0: Got data interrupt 0x00600000, but there is no active command.
Hi, on such system: % uname -a FreeBSD w530.local 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0: Thu May 21 10:41:11 CEST 2015 root@w530.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 ...I got these error messages (and not working SD card) while this card works properly on Windows: mmc0: MMC/SD bus on sdhci_pci0 mmcsd0: 34GB SDHC APPSD 0.0 SN 03ED MFG 10/2003 by 0 0x3000 at mmc0 50.0MHz/4bit/65535-block mmc0: CMD7 failed, RESULT: 1 mmc0: ACMD42 failed, RESULT: 4 mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout sdhci_pci0-slot0: Got data interrupt 0x0060, but there is no active command. sdhci_pci0-slot0: == REGISTER DUMP == sdhci_pci0-slot0: Sys addr: 0x0f396200 | Version: 0x0502 sdhci_pci0-slot0: Blk size: 0x0200 | Blk cnt: 0x0001 sdhci_pci0-slot0: Argument: 0x03e7 | Trn mode: 0x0013 sdhci_pci0-slot0: Present: 0x01ff | Host ctl: 0x0007 sdhci_pci0-slot0: Power:0x000f | Blk gap: 0x sdhci_pci0-slot0: Wake-up: 0x | Clock:0x0007 sdhci_pci0-slot0: Timeout: 0x000d | Int stat: 0x sdhci_pci0-slot0: Int enab: 0x01ff00fb | Sig enab: 0x01ff00fb sdhci_pci0-slot0: AC12 err: 0x | Slot int: 0x sdhci_pci0-slot0: Caps: 0x21e8c8b2 | Max curr: 0x0040 sdhci_pci0-slot0: === mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout Regards, vermaden ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
