gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

% gdb ./edge_stat GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:52:35PM +, K. Macy wrote: > kgdb7111 is what you use for kernel. It works fine for me. kgdb7111 don't find .debug under /usr/lib/debug/ gdb found it. > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 08:29 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

In tree gdb doesn't work for much of anything these days. It can't even consistently give a complete kernel backtrace. Jhb is graciously maintaining gdb in ports. It will be installed as the awkwardly named gdb7111 IIRC. On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 06:53 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:01:04PM +, K. Macy wrote: > In tree gdb doesn't work for much of anything these days. It can't even > consistently give a complete kernel backtrace. Jhb is graciously > maintaining gdb in ports. It will be installed as the awkwardly named > gdb7111 IIRC. 1. gdb7111

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

kgdb7111 is what you use for kernel. It works fine for me. On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 08:29 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:01:04PM +, K. Macy wrote: > > > > > In tree gdb doesn't work for much of anything these days. It can't even > > > consistently

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

On 08/12/2016 18:57, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > kgdb7111 don't find .debug under /usr/lib/debug/ > gdb found it. $ gdb7111 bhyve /var/coredumps/bhyve.0.0.core GNU gdb (GDB) 7.11.1 [GDB v7.11.1 for FreeBSD] Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or

card=0x812911ec on FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #1 r309672

hello! I have a builtin card=0x812911ec on my mb and as of yesterday it refused to be recognised by if_re and was brought up using if_rl. It was a little bit unexppected, really. What commit did make this thing happen? Will it be reverted? was: re0: Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

It does, the path arguments are different. I've used kgdb7111 for the last year. On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 08:57 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:52:35PM +, K. Macy wrote: > > > > > kgdb7111 is what you use for kernel. It works fine for me. > > > >

Re: gdb broken on stable/11 and current?

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 07:56:03PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 08/12/2016 18:57, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > kgdb7111 don't find .debug under /usr/lib/debug/ > > gdb found it. > > $ gdb7111 bhyve /var/coredumps/bhyve.0.0.core > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.11.1 [GDB v7.11.1 for FreeBSD] > Copyright (C)

freebsd-update

Basic symptom: # /usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-STABLE from update.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Trace: # sh -x /usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch ... +

Re: freebsd-update

the problems were o op error trying to binary on stable not release o freebsf-update fetch should not be dns case sensitive no matter what o the libipx.so.4/5 lack of update in 10-release.p13 i am sure there are other problems including yours. it's getting sloppy. randy

Re: freebsd-update

On Dec 8, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > Basic symptom: > ># /usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch >Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. >Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-STABLE from update.FreeBSD.org... > failed. >No mirrors remaining,