On 2021-Feb-12, at 23:03, Mark Millard wrote:
> Dewayne Geraghty dewayne at heuristicsystems.com.au wrote on
> Sat Feb 13 06:04:52 UTC 2021 :
>
>> The main list we used was:
>>
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-12/
>>
>> but that appears dead.
>> . . .
>>
On 2/17/21 22:35, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2021, at 6:01, Xin Li wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
> b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
> following rule:
>
> block in quick proto tcp
>> Could you see
>> if the hang persists when boot-time ucode loading is enabled and
>> vm.pmap.di_locked=1 is configured?
Hi,
I can confirm that setting vm.pmap.di_locked=1 and enabling the loading
of the cpu microcode at the same time does not cause any trouble.
Unfortunately I didn't had
Hi
I noticed on a box that I update RELENG_12 via git there are more
recent commits then if I use svnlite to track. Are they only
periodically updated ? If so, how frequently do they get refreshed ?
e.g. I see the new OpenSSL version in git, but not when I update via
svnlite.
# svnlite
> On Feb 12, 2021, at 5:31 PM, tech-lists wrote:
> As subject, where to get sources for 12-stable upgrade now? Is it still
> svn or is it git?
tl;dr: git is the source of truth, but there’s a bunch of details that might
matter.
The current source of truth is git repository on
On a Denverton SoC platform with eMMC, under heavy load I see a
"Controller timeout" error, followed by a register dump, and then every
operation performed after returns a timeout from the MMC (Error
indicated: 1 Timeout). The only way to recover is to reboot the
machine.
This also occurs when
On 2/17/2021 12:10 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2021, at 6:05 AM, mike tancsa wrote:
>> I noticed on a box that I update RELENG_12 via git there are more
>> recent commits then if I use svnlite to track. Are they only
>> periodically updated ? If so, how frequently do they get
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 23:11, tech-lists wrote:
>
> I saw on cgit that stable/12 was there. These older systems weekly
> update their sources via svn till now, in a cron job. At the time I wrote
> my message, I saw that svn still works, so was wondering which to use,
> which has the latest
> On Feb 17, 2021, at 6:05 AM, mike tancsa wrote:
> I noticed on a box that I update RELENG_12 via git there are more
> recent commits then if I use svnlite to track. Are they only
> periodically updated ? If so, how frequently do they get refreshed ?
> e.g. I see the new OpenSSL version
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 01:04, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
>
> Is there a timeline when svn for stable-12 /usr/src disappears?
stable/11 and stable/12 will exist in svn for at least as long as the
branches are supported - stable/12 expected EOL is June 30,2024. If
you're tracking stable you don't
> On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:03 PM, Dewayne Geraghty
> wrote:
> As a change management task, I would hope that a mapping between svnlite
> and git would've become available for FreeBSD users, similar to the cvs
> to svnlite migration. I guess we need to create a test machine to
> figure out the
Hi,
It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
following rule:
block in quick proto tcp from any os "Linux" to any port ssh
would get interpreted as:
block drop in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 22
On 18 Feb 2021, at 6:01, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
following rule:
block in quick proto tcp from any os "Linux" to any port ssh
would get interpreted as:
block drop in
On 2/17/21 22:57, Xin Li wrote:
> On 2/17/21 22:35, Kristof Provost wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2021, at 6:01, Xin Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
>> b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
>> following
14 matches
Mail list logo
