On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Georgi Hristov wrote:
I just noticed that the 4.8-Release has populated
the mirror servers around the world.
I think this is the final, even though RE has not
acknoledge it ... What are the chances of droping the
tag, making
Hi everyone, I released turned to FreeBSD simply because I am
discouraged with windows and there security scheme (did you guys see the
document microsoft wrote about how to stop windows from sending out info
about your computer onto the net? it's freaking 250 pages, and that
doesn't cover all
What are we supposed to use for information on ports nowadays,
since the port info has been taken away and more and more of
the `make search key=anything` gives a result like:
Port: xsmbrowser-3.3.0
Path: /usr/ports/net/xsmbrowser
Info: ** No Description
Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
Gunnar Flygt wrote:
What are we supposed to use for information on ports nowadays,
since the port info has been taken away and more and more of
the `make search key=anything` gives a result like:
Port: xsmbrowser-3.3.0
Path: /usr/ports/net/xsmbrowser
Info: ** No Description
Maint:
Jd wrote:
Hi everyone, I released turned to FreeBSD simply because I am
discouraged with windows and there security scheme (did you guys see the
document microsoft wrote about how to stop windows from sending out info
about your computer onto the net? it's freaking 250 pages, and that
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 06:05:44AM -0600, Greg Panula wrote:
Gunnar Flygt wrote:
What are we supposed to use for information on ports nowadays,
since the port info has been taken away and more and more of
the `make search key=anything` gives a result like:
Port: xsmbrowser-3.3.0
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
Do you actually have the doc tree in /usr/doc ?
Looking through the log file it should have...
cd /disk2/release/usr rm -rf doc cvs -R -d /disk2/cvs-mirror co -P doc
cvs checkout: Updating doc
U doc/Makefile
U doc/README
Ahah! I think the
Gunnar Flygt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 06:05:44AM -0600, Greg Panula wrote:
Gunnar Flygt wrote:
What are we supposed to use for information on ports nowadays,
since the port info has been taken away and more and more of
the `make search key=anything` gives a result like:
Hi List,
my FreeBSD-4.8-Stable custom kernel crashes in USB code during boot. It
does not matter if any USB device is connected. I checked all
combinations of no, one, or two devices connected out of my collection
(USB memory stick, Sony clie handheld). The crash is reproducible at the
same
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
GF Port: smb2www-0.0.980804_1
GF Path: /usr/ports/www/smb2www
GF Info: ** No Description
GF
GF I don't know what you mean with the word buggared but whatever it
GF is, this system is one of a lot of FreeBSD mashines showing the same
GF result
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM Well, until Akinori-san wif the portsdb, you should use
~~~
Uhmm, mad fingers. This should be 'fix', of course ;-)
DM cd /usr/ports make index
DM
DM instead of
DM
DM portsdb -U
Sincerely,
D.Marck
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:08:08PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
...plus
we generally agreed that sending out a release announcement on 1 April
was a Bad Idea (TM).
Oh, come on! That would have certainly fixed Slashdot once and for
all... :-)
==ml
--
Michael Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
12 matches
Mail list logo