Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8

John Bdckstrand wrote: Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with running out of mbuf clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down 1000-4000 connections, but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp 8192 mbuf clusters. I also tried setting maximum amount of mbuf

Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:03:20AM +0200, John B?ckstrand wrote: Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with running out of mbuf clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down 1000-4000 connections, but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp 8192 mbuf clusters. I

Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8

From this it sounds as it is a problem that should be fixed, but it obviously isnt in 4.8. Is this behaviour now considered acceptable? And if so, doesnt this make FreeBSD extremely easy to kill using a simple DOS-attack? Is this fixed in any way on 5.1? Yup, that is what DoS

Is there something sppecial about pass4 ?

Machine is 4.8-STABLE smaug# camcontrol devlist COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07 at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) COMPAQ BD009122C6 B016 at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1) COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07 at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,da2) COMPAQ BD00962373 BCJE at

Re: Is there something sppecial about pass4 ?

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 15:59:33 +0100, Pete French wrote: Machine is 4.8-STABLE smaug# camcontrol devlist COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07 at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) COMPAQ BD009122C6 B016 at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1) COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07 at scbus0

Re: Can I remove lib-elf.so.1?

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote: GTF I am cleaning up my 4-STABLE system. After a fresh installworld, I am GTF looking at files that did not get touched by the install. Is it safe to GTF remove all such files? GTF GTF In particular, I am looking at /usr/libexec/lib-elf.so.1, which has

Re: Can I remove lib-elf.so.1?

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:52:55PM -0600, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote: I am cleaning up my 4-STABLE system. After a fresh installworld, I am looking at files that did not get touched by the install. Is it safe to remove all such files? No, it is not always safe. Some files are only updated if the

Virus Alert

*** THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE *** A mail message sent from this account to a Cisco employee had an attachment called your_details.zip. The file your_details.zip contained a virus. Please contact your local System Administrator for further assistance.

apache panics on a recent 4.8-STABLE

Yesterday I begin a couple of update to the latest 4.8-STABLE. After that the two boxes continues to go in panics as soon as Apache (1.3 from the ports, also freshly recompiled, 2.0.x seems NOT to hang) starts. I don't know if it is related to the other thread : Kernel core dump in recent

Re: garbled top display

Eric J. Chet wrote: [...] Just a sanity check. I'm seeing a garbled display with top. I rebuild kernel and world a couple times, I even rm -rf /usr/include to make sure I was up to date. Anybody else seeing this? Define garbled. Thanks, David Sure Script started on Mon Jun 23

Re: IBM ServeRaid - ips driver?

I have a brand new IBM 335 with IDE controller and I have the same keyboard problem. The keyboard is working at bios/bootloader and stop to work when freebsd kernel boot. I get this error atkbd: unable to set the command byte. Any clue? uname -a FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

Re: IBM ServeRaid - ips driver?

verbose boot Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbd0: AT Keyboard flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbd: the current kbd controller command byte 0065 Jun 26 14:50:59 kernel: atkbd: unable to