On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:00:39 -0500 (EST)
Kenneth W Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello -stable:
>
> Any idea(s) why (my) 5.3-stable (as of 9 February) isn't
> configuring the network interface or setting up the default route?
>
> I installed 5.3-release from CD and things worked fine.
> T
Hello -stable:
Any idea(s) why (my) 5.3-stable (as of 9 February) isn't
configuring the network interface or setting up the default route?
I installed 5.3-release from CD and things worked fine.
Then I updated the system sources (via cvsup) to RELENG_5 and
went through {build,install}world/mergem
Rob,
I am currently running 5.3 Release on a Tyan Trinity 400 (VIA 82C596B
UDMA66) with 2 x Seagate Barracude IV (UDMA100) and have no stability
issues. e.g from dmesg:
atapci0: port
0xe000-0xe00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
ata1: chann
> >sio5: 1 more silo overflow (total 7)
> >puc0: port
> >0xb000-0xb007,0xb400-0xb407,0xb800-0xb807,0xd000-0xd007 mem
> >0xea80-0xea80003f irq 14 at device 12.0 on pci2
> >sio4: configured irq 14 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0x8000
> >sio4: type 16550A
> >sio5: configured irq 14 not in bitmap o
> Hello.
>
> I have an Atheros PCI card in my firewall/gateway machine.
> It seems fully configured because the clients see a good strong signal
> but I can't get a dhcp lease from it. I'm not bothering with WEP just yet.
>
> I followed the instructions found here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/d
Hello.
I have an Atheros PCI card in my firewall/gateway machine.
It seems fully configured because the clients see a good strong signal
but I can't get a dhcp lease from it. I'm not bothering with WEP just yet.
I followed the instructions found here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/
Hi,
I have two PCs, with apparently a somewhat old
motherboard, since there's a maximum support for
UDMA66 by the harddisk controller.
The attached harddisks are newer and allow a
higher speed of UDMA100.
This combination of older motherboard and newer
harddisk causes great problems with 5.X (it
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 05:10:22PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
>
> The issue I'm seeing, seconds after launching gnome-terminal,
> gnome-terminal terminal completely froze. I can move and resize the
> window, but cannot kill or close it. A quick look at top shows:
>
> 38043 djp 200 2104
Hello,
i had the verion 1 of the freenet6 client running for a long time. now,
after upgrading to 2.1.1 on a 5.2.1 box the tspc client dumps core. it
sometime sets the tunnel up and the the tunnel works fine and it is possible
to ping6 www.kame.net and also access it via the http proxy. but tspc n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:03:33 +0100, Ivan Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just note that it could not be /dev/da but /dev/ad, e.g, da is
> only for SCSI disks and ad is for IDE ones.
Only for *internal* IDE drives.
USB drives use umass whi
Hello,
After following the ULE status thread with some interest, I decided to
enable on my i386, hyperthread-enabled, UNP machine. Perhaps not the
best test bed, but a test none the less.
I'm running a series of make -jX buildworld to put load on the system
and running X with XFCE4 to get an id
Ivan Roth wrote:
just note that it could not be /dev/da but /dev/ad, e.g, da is
only for SCSI disks and ad is for IDE ones.
Actually no - usb disks look like scsi disks - so my 250GB usb drive
is /dev/da0
John
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Doug White a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Jack Raats wrote:
I want to add an usb harddisk.
Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a "NTFS/HPFS/QNX" disk
Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
NTFS is a Windows filesystem. You can't install FreeBSD to it but you can
mount and us
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Jack Raats wrote:
> I want to add an usb harddisk.
> Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a "NTFS/HPFS/QNX" disk
> Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
NTFS is a Windows filesystem. You can't install FreeBSD to it but you can
mount and use the volume. See th
I want to add an usb harddisk.
Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a "NTFS/HPFS/QNX" disk
Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
What kind of dev/fstab do I need to add?
Do I need an extra swap slice? How to make one?
I'm using FreeBSD 4.11.
Thank you
Jack Raats
_
On Feb 10, 2005, at 18:32, Doug Poland wrote:
On Thu, February 10, 2005 10:39 am, Julio Capote said:
I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my
desktop system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME
performance under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE
b
On Feb 10, 2005, at 18:22, Mipam wrote:
I noticed this:
You're running RELENG_5 on a dual Xeon 3.06GHz box
You enabled DEVICE_POLLING and ULE as well.
But normally compiling the kernel with SMP and polling won't work.
Don't you use a SMP kernel or?
I saw several pages stating that DEVICE_POLLING ac
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:42:01PM +0200, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a serious problem with the puc device driver. When the
> driver
> expiriences overflows the server simply reboots!
>
> device puc
> options PUC_FASTINTR
>
> I have tried to rebuild
On Thu, February 10, 2005 11:43 am, Kevin Oberman said:
>> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:32:34 -0600 (CST) From: "Doug Poland"
>> Precisely how does one upgrade 5-STABLE to include ULE + PREMPT?
>> Obviously I'll cvsup RELENG_5, but don't know how to set ULE +
>> PREMPT.
>>
> Put them in your configura
Cvsup to RELENG_5, and change your kernel config ot include ULE and
PREMPTION support; I suggest reading the "keeping up to date" and
"kernel compiling" chapters on the handbook, if you haven't done so
already.
-Julio
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:32 -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
> On Thu, February 10,
On Thu, February 10, 2005 10:39 am, Julio Capote said:
> I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my
> desktop system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME
> performance under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE
> benches..
>
Precisely how does one upgr
Hi,
I noticed this:
You're running RELENG_5 on a dual Xeon 3.06GHz box
You enabled DEVICE_POLLING and ULE as well.
But normally compiling the kernel with SMP and polling won't work.
Don't you use a SMP kernel or?
Bye,
Mipam.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd
At 11:42 AM 10/02/2005, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a serious problem with the puc device driver. When the
driver
expiriences overflows the server simply reboots!
device puc
options PUC_FASTINTR
I have tried to rebuild a new kernel without the PUC_FASTINTR op
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
ah, just commit it already. it works for me, so it must be good enough ;)
DES
heh :)
Works for me, but one problem, slaves attached to a Seagate master,
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:41:21 +0100
> From: Marwan Burelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:55AM
Hi,
I am noticing many warnings:
calcru: negative runtime of -891485461 usec for pid 45 (swi5: clock sio)
in ps waux:
root45 0.0 0.0 08 ?? WL Tue03PM -2341058:-22.07
[swi5: clock sio]
I am seeing lots more of these messages.
Also from other processes i see the same messag
Hi,
There seems to be a serious problem with the puc device driver. When the driver
expiriences overflows the server simply reboots!
device puc
options PUC_FASTINTR
I have tried to rebuild a new kernel without the PUC_FASTINTR option but without
much luck. It still keeps on rebo
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
> I get the same error on two machines, did some googling and found no
> answers that helped. (I fear I don't remember the details now.) As I
> don't have the error on another machine (all running 5.3 STABLE) I
> figured it was someth
I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my desktop
system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME performance
under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE benches..
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:00 +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2005, at 16:30, Rand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 05:23:46PM +0100, Marwan Burelle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a CDRW burner that use to work (with 5.2.1 the last time.)
>
> But since one of my last RELENG_5_2 update I encounter errors when
> burning CDRW (I don't have CDR to tes
Hi,
I have a CDRW burner that use to work (with 5.2.1 the last time.)
But since one of my last RELENG_5_2 update I encounter errors when
burning CDRW (I don't have CDR to test, but I rember having strange
behaviour with CDR also.) Switching to RELENG-5 (re-install 5.3 and
cvsup after) a week ago
On Feb 10, 2005, at 16:30, Randy Bush wrote:
how about stability? last time i tried ule, the system died in
a few days.
Don't know yet.
I will keep trashing the server and post here if it crashes.
Regards,
Frode Nordahl
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
how about stability? last time i tried ule, the system died in
a few days.
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[ Cc'ing Bill Paul, the author of the xl(4) driver ]
> Also, as far as I understand, some extra boost comes
> from using polling the devices; however, not all
> devices do support this yet.
>
> I use SMP (dual intel CPUs) with if_xl lan card,
> but I can't use polling with this device.
>
> ULE +
> > Hello,
> > My first day with a BSD system so.. be gentle
> > please.
> > :)
> >
>
> Hello again...
> I see that no one has come with ideas... so what i am
> asking is this: where can i find the files
> (GENERIC,make.conf etc) that were used in compiling
> the default kernel that comes with th
Thanks to all who tried to help. I decided to move the discussion to acpi@
> >>> Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be
> >>> sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number of
> >>> interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can d
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 4:14:18 PM:
WJW> Both ssh and ftp react almost direct, only after entering the
passwd the
WJW> connections sits idle for > 15 secs.
WJW> So something is is taking a while, and since it is both w
--- Damian-Fekete Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> My first day with a BSD system so.. be gentle
> please.
> :)
>
Hello again...
I see that no one has come with ideas... so what i am
asking is this: where can i find the files
(GENERIC,make.conf etc) that were used in compiling
the d
If this helps, I noticed this recently on the machine that has had tcp lockups.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type c49b flags 3 len 47956 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 98b4 flags 3 len 17725 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 8be6 flags 3 len 38514 > max
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 4:14:18 PM:
WJW> Both ssh and ftp react almost direct, only after entering the passwd the
WJW> connections sits idle for > 15 secs.
WJW> So something is is taking a while, and since it is both with ssh and
WJW> ftp, I woul
>>> Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be
>>> sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number of
>>> interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can do to help
>>> the situation, sadly.
>> I cannot affect the company equipment purch
> Yeah, I've thought about it. But I got no non realtek cards on me, so
> I'd have to buy them. And there's always a chance this has nothing
> to do with network cards or the driver (after all, it has worked
> flawlessly for me since the FreeBSD 3.x days).
> I am wondering if it is related to my m
Freddie Cash wrote:
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
Just curious if this includes support for new chipsets or not. Not a
big deal if it doesn't, just curious.
I've got a Toshiba laptop that, unfortunately, uses the ATI IGP/IXP
chipset, which only gets detected as U
> New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
Just curious if this includes support for new chipsets or not. Not a
big deal if it doesn't, just curious.
I've got a Toshiba laptop that, unfortunately, uses the ATI IGP/IXP
chipset, which only gets detected as UDMA33 (which is f
On 10/2/2005 23:55, "Freddie Cash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in
>> FreeBSD 5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and
>> has persisted since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will
>> be fixed, but no).
>
> I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in
> FreeBSD 5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and
> has persisted since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will
> be fixed, but no).
> I downgraded back to 5.2.1-p13 and it is perfectly fine once again.
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 4:14:18 PM:
WJW> Both ssh and ftp react almost direct, only after entering the passwd the
WJW> connections sits idle for > 15 secs.
WJW> So something is is taking a while, and since it is both with ssh and
WJW> ftp, I would assume it is the actua
Hi,
Running 5.3-Stable from december, this server has a login delay which I
can not really explain.
Both ssh and ftp react almost direct, only after entering the passwd the
connections sits idle for > 15 secs.
So something is is taking a while, and since it is both with ssh and
ftp, I would ass
On 10/2/2005 22:23, "Emanuel Strobl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 11:00 schrieb Martin Minkus:
>
> Just a wils guess: Try setteing 'debug.mpsafet=0' in /boot/loader.conf
> I had similar problems with pf and RELENG_5
>
> No soultion though :(
>
> -Harry
Hey ther
Simon Barner wrote:
> Frode Nordahl wrote:
>
>>I was surprised by the actual difference in system
>> performance and
>>usability between 4BSD and ULE under such loads!
>>
>>If you haven't tried it on your heavy trafic server
>>yet, go and do it
>>right now! :-)
>
>
> Just a short "me too". In
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 11:00 schrieb Martin Minkus:
> I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in FreeBSD
> 5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and has persisted
> since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will be fixed, but no).
>
> I downg
At 06:32 10/02/2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2005-Feb-10 04:39:13 +0100, Bj?rn K?nig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Magda wrote:
>
>>It's "daemon", not "demon".
Or even "dæmon"
>It's a question whether you are British or American or understand it as
>a proper name. ;-)
My dictionary has both as h
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:21:32 -0800, Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On February 9, 2005 04:13 pm, Ivan Roth wrote:
> > sorry to ask that but which software could I use to produce vectorial
> > graphics? Quite newbie to freebsd, don't know such free software.
>
> Inkscape is supposed to b
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As always, enjoy and let me know how it goes...
Peachy.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the Uni
Frode Nordahl wrote:
> I was surprised by the actual difference in system performance and
> usability between 4BSD and ULE under such loads!
>
> If you haven't tried it on your heavy trafic server yet, go and do it
> right now! :-)
Just a short "me too". In my case it isn't a heavy traffic serv
I seem to have been having a rather strange networking issue in FreeBSD
5.3-Stable (it started happening immediately after 5.2.1 and has persisted
since.. I keep ³hoping² that next time I cvsup it will be fixed, but no).
I downgraded back to 5.2.1-p13 and it is perfectly fine once again.
*** Som
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in t
>> Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be
>> sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number
>> of interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can do to
>> help the situation, sadly.
>
> Buy a PCI-X SCSI/GigE card, and use that inst
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
ah, just commit it already. it works for me, so it must be good enough ;)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@fre
Tim Welch wrote:
A problem still exists with 48-bit addressing. This url details a fix
I've been using for the last 4 months or so with no issues yet.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2004-October/008821.html
Are you stil experiencing problems with atamkIII ?
In that case its a di
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 15:00 schrieb Søren Schmidt:
[...]
As always, enjoy and let me know how it goes...
It's running here on several RELENG_5 machines. Like with j I also can't find
any problems with k :)
But the strange 16MB/s limit on my ICH2 (i815 B-step (tualatin
61 matches
Mail list logo
