Hello,
3 out of 4 of my systems at home use realtek ( rl0 ) NIC's and i've
never had a problem with them. Have you tested that NIC with another OS?
Try using it with a linux distro or windows and see if the network card
holds up. If the card still fails put it in another machine and try
tho
Dear all!
I have graphic card as in subject.
With "ati" and "radeon" driver it
makes not so clear picture, looking
out of focus. 5.4, amd64 version.
Does someone have similar behaveour?
Best regards
Zoran
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.
On 24/05/2005, at 5:01, alan bryan wrote:
Here's a recap of all the things I've tried and
discovered in a bunch of testing today.
Tried mkIII "m" patches and that doesn't show atapici1
or atapici2 - they just show as GENERIC with drives as
UDMA33
Tried mkIII "n" patches and then atapici1 show
On Tue, 24 May 2005 13:04, Randy Bush wrote:
> could someone explain why kernel ppp is needed at all?
> >>>
> >>> It's needed if you want to use it, of course :)
> >>
> >> the context is palm usb support
> >
> > Seems odd you would _need_ kernel PPP support for that..
>
> seemed odd to me too.
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 11:53:26PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Mipam wrote this message on Wed, May 11, 2005 at 16:39 +0200:
> > Perhaps lame to ask,
> > But are the em and bge driver MPSAFE?
> > I couldn't find notes about being mpsafe in the man pages of these
> > drivers?
>
> I was about
could someone explain why kernel ppp is needed at all?
>>> It's needed if you want to use it, of course :)
>> the context is palm usb support
> Seems odd you would _need_ kernel PPP support for that..
seemed odd to me too. but take a look back up the thread, or
just at the reffed site,
It might be beneficial (pipe-dream perhaps) if the all the BSDs coalesced
around one port/packaging system. I hear that netbsd's port system has
the metadata necessary to support different OSs and different OS versions
within one coherent system.
What do you think about the relative strengths of
I did a system update and after that my folding @ home client will not
work without me doing make install in linux_base-8 ports dir. BTW,
linux is already installed from before the update and even after
reinstalling after the update the systems seems to forget it is there
after a reboot. I ca
On Tue, 24 May 2005 12:27, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> could someone explain why kernel ppp is needed at all?
> >
> > It's needed if you want to use it, of course :)
>
> the context is palm usb support
Seems odd you would _need_ kernel PPP support for that..
My PocketPC appears as a USB "almost serial
Here's a recap of all the things I've tried and
discovered in a bunch of testing today.
Tried mkIII "m" patches and that doesn't show atapici1
or atapici2 - they just show as GENERIC with drives as
UDMA33
Tried mkIII "n" patches and then atapici1 shows as
nForce4 with SATA drives but has further
>> could someone explain why kernel ppp is needed at all?
> It's needed if you want to use it, of course :)
the context is palm usb support
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To un
Vivek,
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:12:50AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
V> I see that 5.4-STABLE has an snmpd as core to the system. Are there
V> any accompanying docs on how to use it? The man page and sample
V> config file are all seemingly geared towards the personal
V> implementation of
Hi,
I am having trouble updating the port math/mprime.
I need to convert from .obj coff to .o elf32. However, I get a
complain "Invalid bfd target"
I have the sample port at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~lioux/mprime.tgz
I believe that the problem is related to the fact
that
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:45:48AM +0900, Joel wrote:
> Random comment from the peanut gallery, but ...
>
> > >> Thanks for the info guys. Does this "security support" also mean that
> > >> current ports will be compatible with the release?
> > >
> > > No, there are no guarantees about that. The
Random comment from the peanut gallery, but ...
(B
(B> >> Thanks for the info guys. Does this "security support" also mean that
(B> >> current ports will be compatible with the release?
(B> >
(B> > No, there are no guarantees about that. The ports/ people generally
(B> > try to make things w
On Mon, 23 May 2005, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Sven Willenberger wrote this message on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:58 -0400:
We are running a PostgreSQL server (8.0.3) on a dual opteron system with
8G of RAM. If I interpret top and vfs.hibufspace correctly (which show
values of 215MB and 225771520 (w
Vivek Khera wrote this message on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 17:17 -0400:
> On May 23, 2005, at 1:44 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> >This is incorrect... FreeBSD merged the vm and buf systems a while
> >back,
> >so all of memory is used as a disk cache.. The buf cache is still
> >used
> >for file
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Also try defining PREEMPTION in your kernel on 5.x and above (if you
> are running i386 or amd64). There have been very occasional reports
> of panics with this option enabled (although I use it everywhere and
> have not seen problems on my heavily loaded machines), but int
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 02:57:40PM -0700, Jon Passki wrote:
>
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Jon Passki wrote:
>
> > > Here's what gets me: I was able to do a the supported upgrade
> > > process in an unsupported manner (multiuser m
On Mon, 23 May 2005 23:08:18 +0200
"Simon L. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005.05.23 16:51:18 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2005 3:42 pm, Colin Percival said:
> >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/security/
> > >
> > > In addition to the material there (which is concerned
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Jon Passki wrote:
> > Here's what gets me: I was able to do a the supported upgrade
> > process in an unsupported manner (multiuser mode via ssh w/o a
> > shutdown inbetween, nor going into signle user mode)
On Mon, May 23, 2005 5:08 pm, Simon L. Nielsen said:
> On 2005.05.23 16:51:18 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the info guys. Does this "security support" also mean that
>> current ports will be compatible with the release?
>
> No, there are no guarantees about that. The ports/ people g
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 02:31:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:21:13PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > One thing that probably confuses and misleads a lot of people is when
> > > they build world or a kernel and notice that it's taking
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:21:13PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > One thing that probably confuses and misleads a lot of people is when
> > they build world or a kernel and notice that it's taking much longer
> > than it did under 4.x, so they assume this means that 5.x
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> One thing that probably confuses and misleads a lot of people is when
> they build world or a kernel and notice that it's taking much longer
> than it did under 4.x, so they assume this means that 5.x is slower
> than 4.x. It doesn't. What it means is that 5.x and 4.x have
On May 23, 2005, at 1:44 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
This is incorrect... FreeBSD merged the vm and buf systems a while
back,
so all of memory is used as a disk cache.. The buf cache is still
used
for filesystem meta data (and for pending writes of files, but
those buf's
reference the o
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:00:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 3:51 pm, Kris Kennaway said:
>
> > The common wisdom has been that FreeBSD 4.11 is faster than 5.4 on
> > single processor systems. Imagine my surprise when I went and actually
> > benchmarked this on the package
On 2005.05.23 16:51:18 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 3:42 pm, Colin Percival said:
>
> > http://www.freebsd.org/security/
> >
> > In addition to the material there (which is concerned with existing
> > releases), FreeBSD 5.x is expected to be supported until late 2007
> > (Free
On Mon, May 23, 2005 3:51 pm, Kris Kennaway said:
> The common wisdom has been that FreeBSD 4.11 is faster than 5.4 on
> single processor systems. Imagine my surprise when I went and actually
> benchmarked this on the package build machines, and found that 5.4
> outperforms 4.11 by at least 10% w
On Mon, May 23, 2005 3:42 pm, Colin Percival said:
> http://www.freebsd.org/security/
>
>
> In addition to the material there (which is concerned with existing
> releases), FreeBSD 5.x is expected to be supported until late 2007
> (FreeBSD 5.5 plus two
> years), and FreeBSD 6.x will probably be su
I also have the errors showing up in my periodic logs but they dont
seem to cause me actual network drops.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type e14c flags 3 len 1722 > max
1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 1 flags 3 len 36860 > max
1514)
Chris
On 5/23/05, Jack Raats <[EMAIL PROT
Elliot Finley wrote:
This has been happening since 5.3-R, I've been tuning different
parameters
to no avail. I've taken the disks off of the onboard ICH5 controller and
put them a promise TX4 S150 controller, but still the same thing happens.
The system freezes, but isn't totally dead. It'
I also have the errors showing up in my periodic logs but they dont
seem to cause me actual network drops.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type e14c flags 3 len 1722 > max
1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 1 flags 3 len 36860 > max
1514)
Chris
On 5/23/05, Jack Raats <[EMAIL PROT
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE. At this moment I'm getting all kind of network
losses due to the error rl0: discard oversize frame
Google showed that a lot of PC suffers form this, but I didn't fine the cure :-(
Can anyone help me with a cure?
Met vriendelijke groeten
Jack Raats
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 13:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with portupgrade
After updating my ports tree I'm getting this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:40]/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade:157
> (manually retyped as the machine locks)
> ata2: CONNECT REQUESTED
> ata2: DISCONNECT REQUESTED
> ... (lots of those)
> subdisk6: detached
> ad6: detached
> ata2: SATA connect status=
> ata3: SATA connect ready time=0ms
OK, it may not be so much a lock up as I was just a
bit impatient.
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:21:32PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Could someone point me to a resource that outlines the expected supported
> lifetime of all the branches? Can't find anything concrete on the webpage.
>
> I'm developing a product, which i hope will run on FreeBSD. However the
> rapid
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Could someone point me to a resource that outlines the expected supported
> lifetime of all the branches? Can't find anything concrete on the webpage.
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
In addition to the material there (which is concerned with existing releases),
FreeBSD 5.x
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:21:32PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Could someone point me to a resource that outlines the expected supported
> lifetime of all the branches? Can't find anything concrete on the webpage.
http://www.freebsd.org/security/ - It's listed about 1/3 of the way down
the page i
On 23/05/05, Jim C. Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After updating my ports tree I'm getting this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:40]/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade:157>sudo portupgrade -a
> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 354 packages
> found (-3 +2)
> (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/
Could someone point me to a resource that outlines the expected supported
lifetime of all the branches? Can't find anything concrete on the webpage.
I'm developing a product, which i hope will run on FreeBSD. However the
rapid development of 5, and now 6 arriving out in a few months has me
worried
On Mon, 23 May 2005 10:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note: this comment goes to all participants on this mailing list, it is
not targeted specifically towards Doug.
People, would you please trim away excess / non-relevant text when you
are quoting a message?
I don't hav
After updating my ports tree I'm getting this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:40]/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade:157>sudo portupgrade -a
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 354 packages found
(-3 +2)
(...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:44 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Sven Willenberger wrote this message on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:58 -0400:
> > We are running a PostgreSQL server (8.0.3) on a dual opteron system with
> > 8G of RAM. If I interpret top and vfs.hibufspace correctly (which show
> > values o
Do you get a particular error and which version of mysql are you running:
We have to use 4.0 due to this bug:
http://bugs.mysql.com/?id=7209&edit=2
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Pete French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 6:26 PM
Subject: m
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Jon Passki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I performed an unsupported way of installing and am soliciting what
> I could do next time to prevent installation blues. I'm not
> expecting assistance from the Project, just some love :)
>
> I have a build host that creat
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:47:01AM -0400, Randy Bush wrote:
> could someone explain why kernel ppp is needed at all?
It's needed if you want to use it, of course :)
Kris
pgpxTPt8qYyTd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:45:13PM -0400, MING FU wrote:
> I find that any application which uses libpthread will not
> work. That include named, nslookup, dig. If you have find any work
> stack protector for freebsd 5.4, please share with me.
Please talk to the authors.
Kris
pgpHmSQNLxlSb.pgp
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess turning off the RAID converts the chips into
> standard SATA
> controllers. I'll have to look into that. An nForce
> 4 machine recently
> appeared at work, so I'll see what I can get it to
> do.
That's my understanding. FYI: I also tried turnin
> Oh another of these wonderful races... can you go to that
> frame and "print ts"? If its NULL then someone has ripped
> out the ts out from under us since it was checked for NULL in
> the previous line!
Maybe this is a more useful kgdb session (I'm hoping)
# kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var
Sven Willenberger wrote this message on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:58 -0400:
> We are running a PostgreSQL server (8.0.3) on a dual opteron system with
> 8G of RAM. If I interpret top and vfs.hibufspace correctly (which show
> values of 215MB and 225771520 (which equals 215MB) respectively. My
> under
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Robin P. Blanchard wrote:
> Here's what I could get out of dmesg, and looking again at the dump
>
> # dmesg -M /usr/local/var/adm/crash/vmcore.44 -N /boot/kernel/kernel
> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 0; ap
On Mon, 23 May 2005, [ISO-8859-2] S�awek �ak wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > > I have a problem with booting Dell 2850 over network. The machine reads
> > > > kernel over net, boots upto mounting / from NFS and then crashes.
> > >
> > > What is the NFS server? It seems to think the NFS handle we pu
When port randomisation was added to 4.x I noticed that under heavy
loading my webservers starting dropping their connections to the
the mysql database. This was fixed by disabling port randomisation
and everything ran very happily.
When I upgraded to 5.4 I left port randomisation on, and everythi
Hello,
I performed an unsupported way of installing and am soliciting what
I could do next time to prevent installation blues. I'm not
expecting assistance from the Project, just some love :)
I have a build host that created what I needed for the host being
upgraded. Once it's more polished, I'
"Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:39:19PM -0700, Kachun Lee wrote:
>> I upgraded a server from 4.10 to 5.4-rel and it paniced at soon as I
put >> some load on it...
>> panic: lockmgr: thread 0xfffe, not exclusive lock
on 19.05.2005 13:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> With 4.X on ATA(PI)-only machine systat -vmstat used to show disks
> statistics for both ad and acd devices. Now, in 5.4-RELEASE, it shows
> statistics only for ad devices. If atapicam is added then statistics for
> cd and pass devices is shown
On May 23, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Sven Willenberger wrote:
We are running a PostgreSQL server (8.0.3) on a dual opteron system
with
8G of RAM. If I interpret top and vfs.hibufspace correctly (which show
values of 215MB and 225771520 (which equals 215MB) respectively. My
understanding from having
From: "Søren Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 21/05/2005, at 0:52, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-May-20 14:53:09 -0600, Elliot Finley wrote:
>
>> From: "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> On Fri, 2005-May-20 08:25:58 -0600, Elliot Finley wrote:
>>>
I took the -L option off of my dump
I see that 5.4-STABLE has an snmpd as core to the system. Are there
any accompanying docs on how to use it? The man page and sample
config file are all seemingly geared towards the personal
implementation of the author, and there is no information at all on
extending it.
(this seems to
On May 18, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Tim Howe wrote:
rdist6 as root, it ignores the -P /usr/bin/ssh flag an tries to use
rcmd directly, which fails since my target systems do not have that
service running.
Might I suggest looking into rsync? It has excellent support for ssh
(and in modern versions
We are running a PostgreSQL server (8.0.3) on a dual opteron system with
8G of RAM. If I interpret top and vfs.hibufspace correctly (which show
values of 215MB and 225771520 (which equals 215MB) respectively. My
understanding from having searched the archives is that this is the
value that is used
In the last episode (May 23), Palle Girgensohn said:
> We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after
> installing 5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the
> time, really; see previous posts.)
>
> I've added dumpdev="/dev/amrd0s2b", and some time ago I did get cored
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think this is a bug of make, *.mk or other Makefiles in /sys but I
> > cannot fix it.
> No, this is because MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX must be an environment variable
> and should not be set on make's command line or in /
Hello,
I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 (450MHz P3/Celeron)
that has been running just fine, but after ~ 120 days something
happened to /dev/dsp, and I can no longer play mp3s. A restart would
most probably fix it, but I'd like to know if it's possible to determine
(and fix) the
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Richard Coleman wrote:
> On 5-STABLE, when I try to start ntpd, I get the following error: bind()
> fd 7, family 28, port 123, addr fe80:1::2a0:c9ff:fec8:ea25,
> in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0 fails: Can't assign requested address
>
> Anyone else seen this recently.
I've see
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +0900, NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to rebuild a debug kernel to analyze one of my problem(*),
> and, I faced to another problem. Now this is the main problem for me.
>
> The problem I have now is that 'make buildkernel' does not refer to
> ${MAKE
Here's what I could get out of dmesg, and looking again at the dump
# dmesg -M /usr/local/var/adm/crash/vmcore.44 -N /boot/kernel/kernel
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code
Where I can find any gvinum documentation ?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
could someone explain why kernel ppp is needed at all?
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--On måndag, maj 23, 2005 10.30.47 +0200 Palle Girgensohn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after installing
5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the time, really;
see previous posts.)
I've added dumpdev="/dev/amrd0s2b", an
On 5/22/05, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2005, [ISO-8859-2] S�awek �ak wrote:
>
> > On 5/20/05, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please try to avoid sending your message bodies base64 encoded :) My mail
> > client got really confused by it and didn't quote the me
Thanks for your clear response, yes i was looking for 5.x indeed.
Driver status for 5.x would be very nice indeed, i guess more guys are
interested in such? If someone provides me with info, i'm willing text for
the busdma page you mentioned so that 5.x is also included.
Bye,
Mipam.
On Sat, 21
Hi!
We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after installing
5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the time, really;
see previous posts.)
I've added dumpdev="/dev/amrd0s2b", and some time ago I did get coredumps,
but with latest versions of the kernel, savecor
74 matches
Mail list logo
