Hello Sven,
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 2:29:36 PM, you wrote:
> Apparently this is still somewhat of a mystery, but you are not the
> first person to witness this:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-April/013679.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-Jul
It looks like ipf in not handling fragmented UDP respones
correctly. Is there anything in particular that I need to
say to ipf to make it process the fragments? Unfragemented
responses make it through the firewall. It appears to be
independent of fragment
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Wednesday 01 June 2005 10:07 am, John Baldwin wrote:
:
: > I see. It's because your PIR lists 10 as the only IRQ that it does this.
: > You can override the IRQ with a hint at least using 1.117 of pci_pir.
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 10:07 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> I see. It's because your PIR lists 10 as the only IRQ that it does this.
> You can override the IRQ with a hint at least using 1.117 of pci_pir.c.
> Try setting 'hw.pci.link.0x22.irq=11' in the loader to force the IRQ to 11
> to see if t
Sorry for coming late to the thread -- catching up on mailing list
traffic :)
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Jon Passki wrote:
> I `chflags noschg /lib/libc.so.5` and then used tar to extract the
> exact file. tar was able to unlink the file, and then choked.
> After some unrelated er
You need to give the command 'bt' to gdb for some usefull output.
bt stands for backtrace.
Ronald.
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:11:54 +0200, Steve Rieger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all am wondering is anybody else thats running fbsd 5.4 php4 apache1,
and about 10 php extensions, are noticing
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The ASR 370F firmware brought performance from 'abysmal' to 'slightly
tolerable'. Under ideal conditions, it has been benchmarked to get
close to 170MB/s, but you need to be very careful about stripe alignment
and cache setti
> No, gcc (the linker really) is doing exactly what you are
> telling it. The linker already brings in libc, you have
> to use -nostdlib to prevent it. You must link to objects
> in the correct order. libpthread, libthr, and libc_r all
> provide some functions that are overloaded from libc.
> Wh
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
>
> I've found the problem for my own program. I was compiling with -lc. Why
> I started doing that in the first place I can't remember, but removing
> that option fixed above fatal error, and seems to have no negative
> effects (of course, why would it).
>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:57:59PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Had an interesting panic on RELENG_5 today. System was under high memory
> load due to a run-away pine process that was also generating a very high
> memory load on the kernel due to heavy network I/O, but the swap pager
> keel
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:25:44 +0200 fandino wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:17:31 +0200 fandino wrote:
> >> I'm testing a new configuration with heimdal and the ldap backend
> >>but kadmin is completely ignoring the ldap directive in the dbname
> >>definition.
> ...
> >>w
hi all am wondering is anybody else thats running fbsd 5.4 php4
apache1, and about 10 php extensions, are noticing any issues
when i run anything via php command line it cores, and the gdb gives me
this from the core file
55F_10_25_4_27# gdb /usr/local/bin/php php.core
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD
Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The faster rpms will get you more concurrent I/Os per second but won't
do as much for throughput. My asr 3200S cards got repurposed before I
could try them with 5.x, but with the 370F firmware I'm prett
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 01), Steven Hartland said:
Thanks for that Bruce I'm quite surprised that these numbers are so
low after playing with a cheapo hightech SATA controller which with
the help of the guys on the list I was able to give out 200MB/s I
really would expect th
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The faster rpms will get you more concurrent I/Os per second but won't
do as much for throughput. My asr 3200S cards got repurposed before I
could try them with 5.x, but with the 370F firmware I'm pretty sure I
was able to get
Hello Martin,
Okay I've rolled my world and kernel back to May 8th on the RELENG_5
branch and have rebooted. We're now at 2 hours uptime and there is no
sign of the ATA timeouts. With the newer kernels the first timeout
would appear within 5 to 10 minutes of rebooting. I can't see any
changes t
At 05:05 AM 6/1/2005, you wrote:
I have checked on the DELL site for any updates to the BIOS/Firmware and the
2 PE2850's are running the latest versions.
BIOS A02
Dell Backplane Firmware, v.1.00, A00
Dell BMC Firmware, v.1.23, A03
LSI Logic Perc 4e/Di, v.516A, A01
Both machines have the same sy
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Tony Byrne:
> M> Affected kernel version:
> M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 31 00:19:34 CEST 2005
>
> M> Last known working version:
> M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon May 9 00:50:46 CEST 2005
>
> This looks to be the same problem alright. Can yo
In the last episode (Jun 01), Steven Hartland said:
> Thanks for that Bruce I'm quite surprised that these numbers are so
> low after playing with a cheapo hightech SATA controller which with
> the help of the guys on the list I was able to give out 200MB/s I
> really would expect the relatively ex
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-05-31 19:48:33 +0200:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:43:16PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
> >
> > What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
> > TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe ther
Thanks for that Bruce I'm quite surprised that these numbers are
so low after playing with a cheapo hightech SATA controller which
with the help of the guys on the list I was able to give out 200MB/s
I really would expect the relatively expensive SCSI controllers to
do significantly better especia
On Friday 27 May 2005 11:48 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2005 02:48 pm, you wrote:
> > The patch should change the IRQ numbers and also print out a line about
> > how it is trusting your BIOS over the $PIR, so I think you didn't
> > backport the patch correctly or boot the patched ke
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:38:17AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Thanks for that info. Have you had experience with the card
> itself? Just did a few benchmarks and considering the disks
> attached ( RAID 5 ) the performance is shockingly bad
> 20->30MB/s read off the device node
Hello,
> I've built a new installation, and I'm no longer seeing my old
> problem, but a new one. I have a small Qt based application. As soon
> as I try to open any dialog (no matter whether it's a standard open
> file dialog or one I wrote myself), It aborts with
>
> Fatal error 'Recurse on a
Hi!
Seems to me that it's like a FAQ, but can't find an answer. Upgrade
from 5.2.1 to 5.4 via NFS:
On nfs server:
1. buildkernel
On host:
1. mount_nfs /usr/src
2. mount_nfs /usr/obj
3. installkernel
4. mergemaster -p
5. make installworld
-
mkdir -p /tmp/install.aCiGkcCk
Hello Martin,
M> Affected kernel version:
M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 31 00:19:34 CEST 2005
M> Last known working version:
M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon May 9 00:50:46 CEST 2005
This looks to be the same problem alright. Can you confirm that the
problem goes away when you revert to the e
Had an interesting panic on RELENG_5 today. System was under high memory
load due to a run-away pine process that was also generating a very high
memory load on the kernel due to heavy network I/O, but the swap pager
keels over due to ENOMEM (error 12). Before I knew it, syslogd was core
du
Hello,
I've built a new installation, and I'm no longer seeing my old problem,
but a new one. I have a small Qt based application. As soon as I try to
open any dialog (no matter whether it's a standard open file dialog or
one I wrote myself), It aborts with
Fatal error 'Recurse on a private mutex
Thanks for that info. Have you had experience with the card
itself? Just did a few benchmarks and considering the disks
attached ( RAID 5 ) the performance is shockingly bad
20->30MB/s read off the device node no other IO happening
( measured using dd ).
Does anyone have any recomendations for oth
I have checked on the DELL site for any updates to the BIOS/Firmware and the
2 PE2850's are running the latest versions.
BIOS A02
Dell Backplane Firmware, v.1.00, A00
Dell BMC Firmware, v.1.23, A03
LSI Logic Perc 4e/Di, v.516A, A01
Both machines have the same symptoms or the reboots at random tim
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Imobach González Sosa wrote:
First of all, THANK YOU all for your help. I tried all your solutions
but I didn't worked for me. Why? Simple: the problem seems to be in may
ADSL router.
I'll explain: I took my desktop computer to my neighbour's home. I
connected it to his
Hi,
I have a Tyan based 1U computer with twin Xeon and 6Gb RAM which we recently
installed 5.4 Release on. When we recompiled the kernel with the SMP and PAE
options it would randomly reboot but so far (touch wood) using it with just
4Gb or RAM and removing the PAE kernel (just leaving the SMP on
32 matches
Mail list logo
