Hi folks,
since running on RELENG_6 starting last week on my home server, I'm not
getting any useful periodic security output anymore.
After inspecting the problem I found that the default of
daily_status_security_diff_flags in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf is -b
-u but the ${filter} expression in
Volker wrote:
After inspecting the problem I found that the default of
daily_status_security_diff_flags in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf is -b
-u but the ${filter} expression in /etc/periodic/security.functions is
being set to grep '^'
diff produces a +/- diff format but the output is being
I am also having them problem with the lnc driver. It seems that
sometimes, when an alias is added gratuitous arp packets are not sent out
and until arp cache is expired or the arp table on the router is cleared
the host is unreachable. It seems completely random and there seems to be
no way to
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now, on one of our newer servers runnign a fairly recent cvsup of 4.x, the
fxp driver is doing the exact same thing ... all the other fxp based
servers do a nice quick 'ifconfig alias' for an IP, and arp broadcasts are
sent out, but on this one, I
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, dpk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now, on one of our newer servers runnign a fairly recent cvsup of 4.x, the
fxp driver is doing the exact same thing ... all the other fxp based
servers do a nice quick 'ifconfig alias' for an IP, and arp broadcasts
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Can you try having your network guys enable 'portfast' on your server
port, and then see if adding an IP alias still causes the hang?
I'd love to, but I know nothing about the Cisco switches other then the
very bare minimal ... if you can give
I have made this change on the switch my virtual machines are connected to.
We use HP PorCurve switches, unfortunately the switch needs to be rebooted
for the change to take effect, I will have to do this late tonight. I will
let you know the outcome.
Colin
At 12:56 PM 22/08/2005, Colin Farley wrote:
I have made this change on the switch my virtual machines are connected to.
We use HP PorCurve switches, unfortunately the switch needs to be rebooted
for the change to take effect, I will have to do this late tonight. I will
let you know the outcome.
I am out of the office. I will be back on 8/29/05.
Have a nice day.
Dieter Megger
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be broken
now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same problem.
atapci0: Intel ICH6 SATA150 controller port
On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be
broken now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same
problem.
The ioctl ABI to ATA has changed,
At 04:33 PM 22/08/2005, Søren Schmidt wrote:
On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be
broken now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:38:15 -0400
From: Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:33 PM 22/08/2005, Søren Schmidt wrote:
On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:24:12PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be broken
now.
[...]
[verify1] /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools# atacontrol cap 0 0
usage:
At 04:45 PM 22/08/2005, Kevin Oberman wrote:
The arguments for atacontrol have changed. The update to the man pages
was committed to current in the past day or two. I'm not sure it it has
made it to RELENG_6.
You can't just specify the channel number any more. The channel is now
the device
At 04:54 PM 22/08/2005, damir bikmuhametov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:24:12PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be broken
now.
[...]
[verify1]
On 2005.08.22 16:24:12 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
[verify1] /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools# smartctl -a ad0
smartctl version 5.33 [i386-portbld-freebsd6.0] Copyright (C) 2002-4
Bruce Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
I think you have to specify full path for the
At 05:05 PM 22/08/2005, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2005.08.22 16:24:12 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
[verify1] /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools# smartctl -a ad0
smartctl version 5.33 [i386-portbld-freebsd6.0] Copyright (C) 2002-4
Bruce Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
On 08/20/05 19:28, Johny Mattsson wrote:
I've run into a problem in that it appears that the root mount
gets marked with MNT_NOEXEC for some reason, which causes ld-elf.so.1 to
barf with a message of:
Cannot execute objects on /
Okay, this one's for the archive, in case anyone else runs
So I had this brilliant idea that I was going to install FreeBSD on my new
amd64 system using a 512MB flash drive since I didn't feel like digging out a CD-ROM. I
ended up installing from CD anyway, but I thought I'd share my experience in case anyone
else knows how to do this.
My first
Hi, everybody,
I hope this is the right place that I post to!
When I enabled polling in 5.4 and 4.11, I found that CPU load
in 5.4 is much higher than 4.11. For example, suppose HZ is 5000, in 5.4
the idle CPU is about 87%, but in 4.11, the idle CPU is about 99.9%. Is
21 matches
Mail list logo
