Re: (bsd)tar is broken on 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Zucconi
 Jonathan Noack writes:

  Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
  # tar cf /dev/null X11R6.old
  # archive_write_pax_header: 'x' header failed?!  This can't happen.

  This seems to work fine here:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $ uname -rm
  6.1-RELEASE i386
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $ tar --version
  bsdtar 1.02.023, libarchive 1.02.026
  Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Tim Kientzle
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $ tar cf /dev/null X11R6
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $

Sure, but the directories are not the same. I have narrowed the
problem to a specific subdirectory and I think I have the explanation:

-rw-r--r--  1 jmz  jmz4312 Apr 16  1947 supclkrd.prg

Don't ask me why the date is wrong, this is really old stuff :-)

On the other hand tar has no problem extracting it. If someone wants
to debug it, the archive is available as
http://people.freebsd.org/~jmz/a.tar

Jean-Marc

-- 
Jean-Marc Zucconi -- PGP Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [KeyID: 400B38E9]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [patch, try 1] Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-26 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
Hi!

On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:

 Please, users who reported the problem and willing to help,
 try the patch (generated against STABLE) and give the feedback.

I test it with RELENG_6 from 25 May 2006. It's work fine. Thank you.

WBR
-- 
Dmitriy Kirhlarov
OILspace, 26 Leninskaya sloboda, bld. 2, 2nd floor, 115280 Moscow, Russia
P:+7 495 105 7247 ext.203 F:+7 495 105 7246 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OILspace - The resource enriched - www.oilspace.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: (bsd)tar is broken on 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/26/06 04:37, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
 Jonathan Noack writes:
 
   Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
   # tar cf /dev/null X11R6.old
   # archive_write_pax_header: 'x' header failed?!  This can't happen.
 
   This seems to work fine here:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $ uname -rm
   6.1-RELEASE i386
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $ tar --version
   bsdtar 1.02.023, libarchive 1.02.026
   Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Tim Kientzle
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $ tar cf /dev/null X11R6
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr] $
 
 Sure, but the directories are not the same.

As you provided no details in your original email, I was forced to
assume that the problem was in the use of /dev/null (I used the X11R6
directory for fun).  I was mistaken, but remember that not *all* of us
can read your mind... :)

 I have narrowed the problem to a specific subdirectory and I think I
 have the explanation:
 
 -rw-r--r--  1 jmz  jmz4312 Apr 16  1947 supclkrd.prg
 
 Don't ask me why the date is wrong, this is really old stuff :-)
 
 On the other hand tar has no problem extracting it. If someone wants
 to debug it, the archive is available as
 http://people.freebsd.org/~jmz/a.tar

I see the same thing here.  Touching supclkrd.prg to bring the date
current makes the problem go away.

Tim, any thoughts?

-Jonathan

-- 
Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: (bsd)tar is broken on 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hello!

  I have narrowed the problem to a specific subdirectory and I think I
  have the explanation:
  
  -rw-r--r--  1 jmz  jmz4312 Apr 16  1947 supclkrd.prg
  
  Don't ask me why the date is wrong, this is really old stuff :-)

Since there cannot be a date before January 1st 1970, 0:00 on
any Unix system, i guess there's something seriously broken here.

Signed/unsigned overflow for the time_t value in question?

Regards,
Patrick M. Hausen
-- 
punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung
Vorholzstr. 25Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100
76137 Karlsruhe   http://punkt.de
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

2006-05-26 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
  
  /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with
  
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total allocated
 
 It looks like you are using a malloc-backed md and you do not have
 enough RAM to handle the size.  Perhaps tmpmfs does not use swap
 backing, as it is supposed to?
 
 Kris

First of all if there is not enough kmem (not just plain ram I think)
kernel should not allow disk creation in first place, second - I think
(although there could be some ... reason for that) it's stupid way to
say I don't have more kmem by panicing :). Better way will be just to
fail disk operation of that FS with Disk is full or something like
that. At home I tried to raise kmem like that:
vm.kmem_size_max=1073741824 (I got 2G of RAM)
(setting vm.kmem_size directly panices kernel at boot if I remember
correctly).

but for my surprise kernel panices at exact same allocated md disk space
with the same panic as the original poster's. Is it possible that I
should rise KVA_PAGES too ? And I don't think its documented anywhere
(of course I've tried googling and it's always possible that I've missed
something :). All this was on FreeBSD 6.0.



___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: PXE boot images: 6.1 i386/amd64

2006-05-26 Thread Nora Etukudo
Am 25. Mai 2006 um 14:59:50 +0100 schrieb Paul Civati:

 For those of you wishing to PXE boot 6.1 RELEASE I have made some boot
 images that work easily with pxelinux (syslinux) PXE set-up.

Thank you very much!

First time since several years I'm able again to install a FreeBSD at my site.

My PXELINUX menu looks like this now

   $Id: mkpxe,v 1.7 2004/07/01 18:01:02 nora Exp $

 m5  INST  - Mandriva Limited Edition 2005 (10.2)
 m6  INST  - Mandriva 2006.0
 mc  INST  - Mandriva 2006.X (Cooker)
 f5  INST  - Fedora Core 5 Installation
 debian  INST  - Debian Installer
   fbsd  INST  - FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
   dose  WORK  - DOS Werkzeug-Diskette
gag  TOOL  - GAG Boot-Manager 4.6
mem  TOOL  - MEM86 Speichertest, http://www.memtest86.com/
 a9  AUTO  - Autoinstallation Mandrake Linux 9.2
 a0  AUTO  - AutoInstallation Mandrake Linux 10.0
 a1  AUTO  - AutoInstallation Mandrake Linux 10.1
 a5  AUTO  - AutoInstallation Mandriva Limited Edition 2005 (10.2)
 a6  AUTO  - AutoInstallation 2006.0
 ac  AUTO  - AutoInstallation 2006.X (Cooker)
   f5ks  AUTO  - Fedora Core 5 Kickstart-Installation

   boot:

I didn't need the C/H/S options in the 'append'-line for your 6.1 image.

Liebe Grüße, Nora.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IM-NETZ Neue Medien, Berlin http://www.im-netz.de/
 WWW von Frauen für Frauen, Hamburg  http://www.w4w.net/
 Lesbian Computer Networks, Helsinki http://www.sappho.net/

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: (bsd)tar is broken on 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Fri, 2006-May-26 11:34:43 +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
  -rw-r--r--  1 jmz  jmz4312 Apr 16  1947 supclkrd.prg

Since there cannot be a date before January 1st 1970, 0:00 on
any Unix system, i guess there's something seriously broken here.

Why do you say that?  time_t is signed so it can represent a date
prior to 1970.  In theory, a file prepared on an earlier computer
could have been transferred onto a Unix system whilst retaining
its original modification time.

In this particular case, the date seems unlikely.  That said, it is
a perfectly valid date and it would be nice if tar could support it -
though tar(5) states dates before the epoch are not handled
consistently.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

2006-05-26 Thread Fabian Keil
Iasen Kostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
  On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:

   I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
   
   /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with
   
 panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total
   allocated
  
  It looks like you are using a malloc-backed md and you do not have
  enough RAM to handle the size.  Perhaps tmpmfs does not use swap
  backing, as it is supposed to?

   First of all if there is not enough kmem (not just plain ram
 I think) kernel should not allow disk creation in first place, second
 - I think (although there could be some ... reason for that) it's
 stupid way to say I don't have more kmem by panicing :). Better way
 will be just to fail disk operation of that FS with Disk is full or
 something like that. At home I tried to raise kmem like that:
 vm.kmem_size_max=1073741824 (I got 2G of RAM)
 (setting vm.kmem_size directly panices kernel at boot if I remember
 correctly).
 
 but for my surprise kernel panices at exact same allocated md disk
 space with the same panic as the original poster's. Is it possible
 that I should rise KVA_PAGES too ? And I don't think its documented
 anywhere (of course I've tried googling and it's always possible that
 I've missed something :). All this was on FreeBSD 6.0.

man mdconfig mentions the problem:

 malloc   Storage for this type of memory disk is allocated with
  malloc(9).  This limits the size to the malloc bucket
  limit in the kernel.  If the -o reserve option is not
  set, creating and filling a large malloc-backed memory
  disk is a very easy way to panic a system.

Use a swap backed disk and the problem will disappear.

Fabian
-- 
http://www.fabiankeil.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

2006-05-26 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:15 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
 Iasen Kostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
   On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
 
I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :

/etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with

  panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total
allocated
   
   It looks like you are using a malloc-backed md and you do not have
   enough RAM to handle the size.  Perhaps tmpmfs does not use swap
   backing, as it is supposed to?
 
  First of all if there is not enough kmem (not just plain ram
  I think) kernel should not allow disk creation in first place, second
  - I think (although there could be some ... reason for that) it's
  stupid way to say I don't have more kmem by panicing :). Better way
  will be just to fail disk operation of that FS with Disk is full or
  something like that. At home I tried to raise kmem like that:
  vm.kmem_size_max=1073741824 (I got 2G of RAM)
  (setting vm.kmem_size directly panices kernel at boot if I remember
  correctly).
  
  but for my surprise kernel panices at exact same allocated md disk
  space with the same panic as the original poster's. Is it possible
  that I should rise KVA_PAGES too ? And I don't think its documented
  anywhere (of course I've tried googling and it's always possible that
  I've missed something :). All this was on FreeBSD 6.0.
 
 man mdconfig mentions the problem:
 
  malloc   Storage for this type of memory disk is allocated with
   malloc(9).  This limits the size to the malloc bucket
   limit in the kernel.  If the -o reserve option is not
   set, creating and filling a large malloc-backed memory
   disk is a very easy way to panic a system.
 
 Use a swap backed disk and the problem will disappear.
I ment KVA_PAGES (If it is the limit). But may be malloc bucket
limit (which I don't realy understand what it means) has something to
do with it ? But whatever is the cause I think it no good practice to
leave such easy ways to panic the kernel unsecured/pached/fixed. And I
wander why even when I set kmem_size_max to 1G kernel still panices
around 350MB allocated md space ? I mean what is the real issue there ?

Regards.


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: GELI issues ? (Re: Increase in panics under 6.1)

2006-05-26 Thread Stanislaw Halik
On Thu, May 25, 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
 Interestingly enough , i had some nasty issues todays on same laptop.
 I had  2 x 6 GB GELI vnodes, running mtree -K md5digest to compare
 contents. Disk IO was high as expected...but then it just died down
 (but the mtree hadnt finished). 
 (swap is also GELI)

 Any subsequent process trying to access the encrypted mount points
 simply stalled for as long as I cared to wait (10 minutes). The
 processes even stalled a shutdown -r. 
 I'm not sure if it's related, but I lately see this behaviour on
 NFS mounts if the server is not responding.

 Doing cd /mnt/mydeadnfsmount/[tab for autocompletion]
 is enough to render the current console unresponsive.

Isn't that normal and desired for `hard' mounts?

-- 
Kocia galeria - http://koty.foo.pl/


pgpLwvacqJ6dg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: (bsd)tar is broken on 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Tim Kientzle

Patrick M. Hausen wrote:

I have narrowed the problem to a specific subdirectory and I think I
have the explanation:

-rw-r--r--  1 jmz  jmz4312 Apr 16  1947 supclkrd.prg


Yes, libarchive in 6.1 has a broken assertion in
the tar-writing code that causes it to
(erroneously) reject files with very
old dates.

This is fixed in -CURRENT; I plan to MFC
a bunch of fixes like this to 6-STABLE
very soon.

In the meantime, you can fix this by
installing the most current libarchive
from:

 http://people.freebsd.org/~kientzle/libarchive

Or you can temporarily patch it by looking in
src/lib/libarchive/archive_write_format_pax.c
and changing the second call to
__archive_write_format_header_ustar()
so that the last argument is 0, not 1.
(The 1 here enables the above-mentioned
assertion checks.)

Tim
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

2006-05-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:26:24PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
 On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
  On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
   Hello,
   
   I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
   
   /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with
   
 panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total allocated
  
  It looks like you are using a malloc-backed md and you do not have
  enough RAM to handle the size.  Perhaps tmpmfs does not use swap
  backing, as it is supposed to?
  
  Kris
 
   First of all if there is not enough kmem (not just plain ram I think)
 kernel should not allow disk creation in first place, second - I think
 (although there could be some ... reason for that) it's stupid way to
 say I don't have more kmem by panicing :). Better way will be just to
 fail disk operation of that FS with Disk is full or something like
 that. At home I tried to raise kmem like that:
 vm.kmem_size_max=1073741824 (I got 2G of RAM)
 (setting vm.kmem_size directly panices kernel at boot if I remember
 correctly).
 
 but for my surprise kernel panices at exact same allocated md disk space
 with the same panic as the original poster's. Is it possible that I
 should rise KVA_PAGES too ? And I don't think its documented anywhere
 (of course I've tried googling and it's always possible that I've missed
 something :). All this was on FreeBSD 6.0.

It's documented in the mdconfig manpage including how to make it not
panic.

Kris


pgpOQwYT9GcFZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

2006-05-26 Thread Arno J. Klaassen
Hello,

thanx to all who responded.
Setting  ' tmpmfs_flags=-S -o async ' survived a nightly
started locate script and a day of intensive 'normal' load.

YMMV, but again, merci!

Arno
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


6-STABLE on a Dual PIII server ...

2006-05-26 Thread Marc G. Fournier


ya, I still have 3 of these :)

dmesg is showing something I've never seen before though:

FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  3
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  0
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [DEB_] had invalid type (Integer) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [MLIB] had invalid type (Integer) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [DATA] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SIO_] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SB__] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [ICNT] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [ACPI] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [LEDP] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [WUES] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [WUSE] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [CSB5] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [BIOS] had invalid type (Integer) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [CMOS] had invalid type (Integer) 
for Scope operator, changed to (Scope)
MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI

Its an Intel motherboard ...


Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


New mobo means USB problems

2006-05-26 Thread William Denton
I recently got a new motherboard and now I have trouble with USB.  I had 
no problems with my two USB drives before, but now a) I can't boot with my 
external USB hard drive connected and powered on, and b) moving files onto 
my Creative MP3 player causes that file system to hang.  This second 
problem seems to be the same as was mentioned here on 5 May, at 
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?iiuui3-q31.ln1


The new motherboard is an ASUS P5S800-VM and the BIOS is right up to date. 
It comes with USB 2.0 built in.  I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE, and built 
a new world on 6 May, after I got this new mobo home.  A healthy dmesg is 
at the bottom of this message.


I saw some talk on mailing lists about ACPI being related to this kind of 
thing, so I tried booting without it (with unset acpi_load at the boot 
prompt) and it panicked, which wasn't helpful.


a) Timeouts and failures when booting with external USB hard drive plugged 
in and turned on.


I have a Maxtor drive in an external USB 2.0 enclosure.  When it's 
connected and turned on, I cannot boot. The different bits from dmesg look 
like this:


[same stuff as usual up to this point; see below]
uhub3: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered
[ten-second or so delay, which I don't see on a normal boot]
atapci1: SiS 181 SATA150 controller port 
0xeff0-0xeff7,0xefe4-0xefe7,0xefa8-0xefaf,0xefe0-0xefe3,0xef90-0xef9f,0xe480-0xe4ff 
irq 17 at device 5.0 on pci0
[continues as normal until ...]
ad0: 39205MB Maxtor 6E040L0 NAR61HA0 at ata0-master UDMA133
ad1: 19092MB WDC WD200BB-00CAA0 16.06V16 at ata0-slave UDMA100
acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8526B/1.03 at ata1-master UDMA33
pcm0: ac97 link rate calibration timed out after 1952041 us
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0
ad0: TIMEOUT - FAILURE [something]
ad1: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0
ad1: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0
ad1: TIMEOUT - FAILUER [someting]
[repeats two more times]
acd0: TIMEOUT - READ_BIG retrying (1 retry left)
[acd0 TIMEOUTs and FAILURES repeated many times]

I usually don't see that pcm0 warning.  Finally after lots of errors I 
have to power cycle it.  I can boot with the USB hard drive turned off, 
and then turn it on and mount it normally, in which case I see:


umass0: vendor 0x04b4 USB Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/2.40, addr 2
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Maxtor 6 L160P0  Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device
da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
da0: 156334MB (320173056 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 19929C)

I have no trouble moving files on or off the drive after that, so it's 
annoying that I have to worry about it when I boot, but it's still usable.


b) USB Creative Muvo TX FM hangs: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT

I have an MP3 player that has a 1 GB flash drive, and it is no longer 
usable on this box.  Here's what it is:


umass0: CREATIVE MuVo TX FM, rev 2.00/11.91, addr 2
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: CREATIVE MuVo TX FM 1191 Removable Direct Access SCSI-4 device
da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
da0: 993MB (2035456 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 993C)

When I mount the file and moves some files onto it, after a couple of 
files, it stops and hangs. I can't access the file system any more, and 
get these errors:


umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT
umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT
umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB reset failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB reset failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR

That continues on and I have to reboot, at which point I see scores of 
errors like this:


g_vfs_done():da0[WRITE(offset=995237848, length=4096)]error = 5

Then I get more BBB reset failed messages, and I have to power cycle.

As I said, I used to be able to use this just fine with my old mobo, and 
my other FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE box can handle it without trouble.


Bill
--
William Denton : Toronto, Canada : www.miskatonic.org : www.frbr.org


Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #4: Sat May  6 22:18:56 EDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SHERLOCK
ACPI APIC Table: A M I  OEMAPIC 
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz (2653.54-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0xf49  Stepping = 9
  
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
  Features2=0x651dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,TM2,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14
  AMD Features=0x2000LM
  AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
real memory  = 1576730624 (1503 MB)
avail memory = 1535930368 (1464 MB)
ioapic0 Version 1.1