SNMP access to pf ALTQ data?

2006-07-08 Thread J. Buck Caldwell
Forgive the cross-posting, but I think I need a wider audience. Is it possible to track pf ALTQ usage with MRTG? I notice that FreeBSD's built-in bsnmpd has a module and mibs to support pf, but I know too little about SNMP to figure out how to access the queue stats. Specifically, I'm

Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ...

2006-07-08 Thread Michael Vince
Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, User Freebsd wrote: I think that I have patched, built and loaded the em(4) kernel module correctly. After applying the patch there were no rejects, before building the module I intentionally appended (patched) to its version string in if_em.c, and

Re: 6.1 quota issues

2006-07-08 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus: Trying again, it reported the same inconsistencies then sat there for more than an hour taking up all the available CPU on the box until I killed it. The mtime on quota.user had not

Re: SNMP access to pf ALTQ data?

2006-07-08 Thread Johan Ström
On 8 jul 2006, at 09.18, J. Buck Caldwell wrote: Forgive the cross-posting, but I think I need a wider audience. Is it possible to track pf ALTQ usage with MRTG? I notice that FreeBSD's built-in bsnmpd has a module and mibs to support pf, but I know too little about SNMP to figure out how

portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 doesn't work with db42

2006-07-08 Thread Miroslav Lachman
I am upgrading some machines today and those with db42 installed failed after portupgrade from portupgrade-2.1.3,1 to portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2. Every command from portupgrade package ends with: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/bdb.so: Undefined symbol

Re: Still getting 'calcru: runtime went backwards'

2006-07-08 Thread Martin Nilsson
John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:01, Mike Jakubik wrote: I'm getting a ton of them now, and i found a way to reproduce them. Basically i run a compile session in one terminal, say make buildkernel, and run top in another. As soon as i run top, the messages appear, and they seem

Re: portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 doesn't work with db42

2006-07-08 Thread Barney Wolff
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:30:25PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I am upgrading some machines today and those with db42 installed failed after portupgrade from portupgrade-2.1.3,1 to portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2. Every command from portupgrade package ends with: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1:

Re: portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 doesn't work with db42

2006-07-08 Thread Martin Jackson
I had the same problem. Fixed it by deleting db41 and rebuilding db42, ruby-bdb and portupgrade. I had the same problem - but I fixed mine by removing ruby-bdb (since I only used it for portupgrade) and rebuilding portupgrade to use ruby-bdb1. I love portupgrade, but it seems a

Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ...

2006-07-08 Thread User Freebsd
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Michael Vince wrote: I thought I remember a developer working on the em driver saying just before 6.1 was released that this reset was needed and couldn't be avoided to ensure performance of the device to work at its best, I can't remember his explanation, but this topic

Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ...

2006-07-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:32:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:38:01PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, User Freebsd wrote: I think that I have patched, built and loaded the em(4) kernel module correctly. After applying the patch there

Re: portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 doesn't work with db42

2006-07-08 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* On 08/07/06 14:30 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: | I am upgrading some machines today and those with db42 installed failed after portupgrade from portupgrade-2.1.3,1 | to portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2. | Every command from portupgrade package ends with: | /libexec/ld-elf.so.1:

Re: portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 doesn't work with db42

2006-07-08 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Odhiambo Washington wrote: rm /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/bdb.so then tell me what happens if you run portupgrade again! I've gone through this today, so it's still fresh in my mind! After removing bdb.so portupgrade is working again. Thank you! Just for my knowledge -

gmake: virtual memory exhausted

2006-07-08 Thread Kim Culhan
Greetings- Compiling Asterisk on 6.1-STABLE: gmake -C db1-ast libdb1.a gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/asterisk/asterisk/db1-ast' gmake[1]: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop. Any suggestion of a tuning parameter to work around this is greatly appreciated. regards -kim --

Re: Still getting 'calcru: runtime went backwards'

2006-07-08 Thread Mike Jakubik
Martin Nilsson wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:01, Mike Jakubik wrote: I'm getting a ton of them now, and i found a way to reproduce them. Basically i run a compile session in one terminal, say make buildkernel, and run top in another. As soon as i run top, the

Re: gmake: virtual memory exhausted

2006-07-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 08), Kim Culhan said: Greetings- Compiling Asterisk on 6.1-STABLE: gmake -C db1-ast libdb1.a gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/asterisk/asterisk/db1-ast' gmake[1]: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop. Any suggestion of a tuning parameter to work