Good morning!
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:47:42PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
- I 'mount -o nfsv3,intr,noconn,-r=32768,-w=32768
-stable-server:/files/bsd /files/bsd '
Does nfsv3 default to TCP? If not have you tried lowering your
blocksite to, say, 8192?
Regards,
Patrick
--
punkt.de
On 17 jul 2006, at 17.40, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
[..]
Install the smartmontools from
/usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/
and post the output of
smartctl -a /dev/ad8
smartmontools was previously installed and running as daemon
without any bad reports.
I can not run
Just out of curiosity I'd like to know why and how the moused rc script ignores
the moused_enable=NO setting.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
[LoN]Kamikaze, 28.07.06, 13:24h CEST:
Just out of curiosity I'd like to know why and how the moused rc script
ignores the moused_enable=NO setting.
It might be interesting to know how and why you come to think it does
first, and what your configuration looks like (e.g. is your mouse
connected
Hi all!
Does someone have any
news about temperature
monitoring for asus (or
some other) gforce3 mobo?
Mine is called k8n 250.
6.1, amd64.
Zoran
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Johan Ström wrote:
[...]
On 17 jul 2006, at 17.40, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
[..]
Install the smartmontools from
/usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/
and post the output of
smartctl -a /dev/ad8
smartmontools was previously installed and running as daemon without
any bad
On Thursday 27 July 2006 02:25, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jiawei Ye wrote:
On 7/27/06, Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to spend $50 extra per system, just so i can read the
temperature, and not even use any of the IPMI functions. I need a simple
and scriptable way to get the
Hi,
I use a system with RELENG_6 (mergemaster is ok). And on startup, I
can see some warnings like this:
ifconfig:
interface rl0 does not exist
this warning appears for all my interfaces (rl0, rl1 and ral0), I
guess I see these messages because my interfaces are renamed with
John Baldwin ?:
If ACPI doesn't include the sysctl's that's due to your BIOS, not FreeBSD.
You can verify by doing an acpidump and seeing if you have any thermal
zones listed in your ASL.
What if there is a thermal zone, but sysctl returns meaningless numbers?
router# sysctl
On Friday 28 July 2006 10:51, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
John Baldwin ?:
If ACPI doesn't include the sysctl's that's due to your BIOS, not FreeBSD.
You can verify by doing an acpidump and seeing if you have any thermal
zones listed in your ASL.
What if there is a thermal zone, but sysctl
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Just out of curiosity I'd like to know why and how the moused rc
script ignores the moused_enable=NO setting.
Do you also have moused_nondefault_enable set to NO? This is assuming
you have a USB mouse.
Sean
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spartak Radchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
router# sysctl hw.acpi.thermal
[...]
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: -257.-1C
If I understand it correctly, the current temperature is -257C, or 16
degrees from absolute zero.
Motherboard is Via MS8000.
Now that's _really_ cool. What
On Sunday 16 July 2006 4:47 am, Mark Knight wrote:
No; I was fast asleep! I think the panic happened while executing a
cron job that does a cvs update in /usr/ports. The same job ran
successfully every morning for the preceding 48 days.
On an unrelated note, do you use CVS to synchronize
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 11:28 am, Martin Blapp wrote:
Off course this is a solution, but I don't like it. On a untuned,
unmodified, unpatched system top(1) should display the correct values
IMHO.
I agree. I think it should show the percentage used of *available* CPUs,
not every one
Hi list,
Should a 6.1 smp compiled kernel run Ok on a uniprocessor?
We ship both single core and dual core systems and would like to use
only one
kernel.
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
Stephen Clark wrote:
Should a 6.1 smp compiled kernel run Ok on a uniprocessor?
We ship both single core and dual core systems and would like to use
only one
kernel.
Yes is should although you might see some performance loss.
Steve
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:44:38 -0400
From: Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list,
Should a 6.1 smp compiled kernel run Ok on a uniprocessor?
We ship both single core and dual core systems and would like to use
only one
kernel.
It should run on a
Don Wilde wrote:
Okay, I've gotten it working with all encryption off (raw DHCP). All the
nasty messages went away, so I'll see what's changed in the ifconfig
options.
ifconfig_iwi0=DHCP ssid rewired channel 11 authmode shared weptxkey 1
wepmode on wepkey 0x1234567890
Can anybody spot it
Am 28.07.2006 um 03:57 schrieb Garance A Drosihn:
It occurred to me that it might be more informative to
see the transaction from the *freebsd* side of things,
since that's the machine running pf! So, here is a
similar set of two lpq's, as seen from the print-server
side of the connection.
At 9:30 PM +0200 7/28/06, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 28.07.2006 um 03:57 schrieb Garance A Drosihn:
It occurred to me that it might be more informative to
see the transaction from the *freebsd* side of things,
since that's the machine running pf! So, here is a
similar set of two lpq's, as seen
Am 28.07.2006 um 22:20 schrieb Garance A Drosihn:
At 9:30 PM +0200 7/28/06, Stefan Bethke wrote:
What I do find curious is that the client keeps using
port 1023 consistently. I was under the impression that
reusing the same port number (thus having the same
src-ip/port+dst-ip/port tuple)
Hello,
I installed a i386 FreeBSD 6.1 to a brand new machine,
CPU: Athlon 64 2GHz
MB: BIOSTAR T-series TForce 6100-939
It installed fine, works fine for a while (15 - 20 minutes),
then all of sudden, the machine goes down. It's not a freeze.
It prints out something (which I cannot read) and
On 7/28/06, Michael Proto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Wilde wrote:
Okay, I've gotten it working with all encryption off (raw DHCP). All
the
nasty messages went away, so I'll see what's changed in the ifconfig
options.
ifconfig_iwi0=DHCP ssid rewired channel 11 authmode shared weptxkey 1
I'm trying to setup a gateway/firewall on my network in a similar setup to
that shown in the in the handbook diagram at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html.
I've followed what I can figure out, adding the following to my /etc/rc.conf
gateway_enable=YES
On 7/26/06, David Duchscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Bruno Ducrot wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:51:25AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I need to be able to get the cpu and fan information from my
motherboard, however none of the monitoring utilities in the
25 matches
Mail list logo
