On 9/08/2006 10:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antony Mawer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 09.08.2006 02:08:20:
Okay. What version of Netware are you using? What are the step-by-step
procedures you are following in order to reproduce this (from step 1 as
logging in to Netware or mounting the
Hi Chris,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:45:18 -0700
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xorg-libraries-6.9.0 X11 libraries and headers from X.Org
xorg-server-6.9.0_4 X.Org X server and related programs
These 2 are XOrg packages
xproto-6.6.2X11 protocol headers
and this one is , i think,
Hi Chris,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:45:18 -0700
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xorg-libraries-6.9.0 X11 libraries and headers from X.Org
xorg-server-6.9.0_4 X.Org X server and related programs
These 2 are XOrg packages
xproto-6.6.2X11 protocol headers
and this one is , i think,
Antony Mawer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 11.08.2006 09:02:38:
Pure speculation -- I wonder if this is because cp is trying to mmap
the file, and for whatever reason that doesn't work as intended with
NWFS? Could you try using something else - eg. we use rsync against
Netware friendly with
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 10 August 2006 11:27, Dominic Marks wrote:
I've had a look, I don't exactly know what to look for, but I have
several PCI Express to
PCI bridges:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:2: class=0x060400 card=0x0044 chip=0x032a8086 rev=0x00
hdr=0x01
vendor = 'Intel
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:27:42AM -0400, lnelson wrote:
l I'm having an odd problem with the Intel em driver. It's
l built into the kernel by default, but it won't recognize
l the part.
l
l However, if I grab the driver source from the Intel website,
l compile it as a KLD, and put it in
Hi,
After using the ipmi module from -stable (or the port in most cases...)
on a couple of PowerEdge 1850's from Dell, I tried the same on the
bigger 2850... unfortunally, it fails. I updated the source-tree today,
and tried both SMP and GENERIC kernel.
On the 1850 I get:
ipmi0: System
On 8/10/06, David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott,
What are you doing when this problem occurs? Is it something
I can easily duplicate here? When I tested the fix on
-CURRENT I used the following command suggested by Doug to
bring out the failure quickly:
ssh bad machine dd
Dominic Marks wrote:
Jerome Sobecki wrote:
Hi all,
We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm)
Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD
6.1 and everything seems ok, except that it's the
On Friday 11 August 2006 05:14, Dominic Marks wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 10 August 2006 11:27, Dominic Marks wrote:
hint.pci3.13.INTA.irq=17
That should make twe0 use IRQ 17.
I doesn't seem to have had the desired effect:
kenv | grep pci3
hint.pci3.13.INTA.irq=17
Are you still having a problem? Can you change the version
number in
if_bce.c (bce_driver_version) and make sure the right
driver is loading?
Dave
Hi Dave,
Well spotted, my appologies for that. I was indedd running a slightly
older version of the driver. I may have mixed up
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:51:08AM -0400, Ken Smith wrote..
Just a note to say the August snapshot builds have completed and are
making their way out to the FTP mirror sites. They are available at
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/200608/.
Checksums for the ISOs:
MD5
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Dominic Marks wrote:
Jerome Sobecki wrote:
Hi all,
We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm)
Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD
6.1 and everything seems
Darn, I thought that that was already fixed. I'll go dig up my patches
and take care of this.
Scott
Pavel Merdin wrote:
Hello.
There's a problem with a very busy server (ad server, CPU is close to
0% idle most of the time).
Configuration: Dual AMD Opteron 252 2.6GHz
Chipset: AMD 8131
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I have same problem on ASUS RS120 with Seagate ST3250820AS/3.AAC
drives (disk loses, system reboots, slow read/write speed), but I
think this is drive problem - all drives has high
Reallocated_Sector_Ct value in SMART (above 130 reallocated sectors
after few weeks,
(sorry if this ends up as a dupe, it I think I sent it wrong the first time)
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:23:03 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:27:42AM -0400, lnelson wrote:
l I'm having an odd problem with the Intel em driver. It's
l built into the kernel by default, but
16 matches
Mail list logo
