On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:48:36PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Ducrot wrote:
cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0
acpi_perf0: ACPI CPU Frequency Control on cpu0
acpi_throttle0: ACPI CPU Throttling on cpu0
cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0
On Tue, November 7, 2006 6:18 pm, Scott Long wrote:
It's just unclear to me how you're associating bce problems with
checksum offloading and IP fragmentation to em problems with design
issues in the watchdog code.
You are correct, the bce watchdog timeouts seem to be related to hw
checksums,
On Monday, 6 November 2006 at 22:42:18 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 11/6/06, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiousity - why wasn't the offending MPSAFE related
changes to em just reverted after discovering the em instability? The
driver -was- stable a couple of months ago,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Well i have 5.5 box with very similar symptomatic :)
I do not see watchdog timeouts on it, but a lot of UP/DOWN events.
Are you sure this is the same problem as what's being discussed
here? If you revert to a previous kernel or em
On Friday, 3 November 2006 at 17:49:28 +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2006 at 17:33:42 +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Hi, guys. I have a panic running squid as web accelerator on
6.2-PRERELEASE. Here is a backtrace:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ACCEL# kgdb
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Well i have 5.5 box with very similar symptomatic :)
I do not see watchdog timeouts on it, but a lot of UP/DOWN events.
Are you sure this is the same problem as what's being discussed
here? If you revert
On Wednesday, 8 November 2006 at 7:41:02 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Well i have 5.5 box with very similar symptomatic :)
I do not see watchdog timeouts on it, but a lot of UP/DOWN events.
Are you sure this is the same
On Wednesday, 8 November 2006 at 9:26:26 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Well i have 5.5 box with very similar symptomatic :)
I do not see watchdog timeouts on it, but a lot of UP/DOWN events.
Are you sure
Scott Long wrote:
I don't doubt that there are users with other problems. We spent some
time collecting as much user data as we could in order to find
patterns and weed out the uncommon cases. But this timer/watchdog
thing looks to be a strong candidate for being the root cause of many
of the
Steven Hartland wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
I don't doubt that there are users with other problems. We spent some
time collecting as much user data as we could in order to find
patterns and weed out the uncommon cases. But this timer/watchdog
thing looks to be a strong candidate for being the
Scott Long wrote:
My personally opinion is that the changes needed are too risky to rush
into 6.2 for all of the different drivers. For the vast majority of
people, what is in 6.2 works quite well, and there is no need to
introduce new bugs. We are pushing forward with if_em because the
Thomas Krause wrote:
BTW: There is no way to disable USB completely?
You can try using loader hints:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=device.hintssektion=5
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:07:26PM +, Vince Hoffman wrote:
Have you tried
cd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/vi
rm -rf * rm .depend
(make clean doesnt delete .depend and rm -rf * doesnt either.)
then try cd /usr/src/usr.bin
make
There's a convenience target for this, make cleandepend.
Wouldn't disabling USB in BIOS work? This appears to be possible from
most of the PC's I see in my travels.
Ivan Voras wrote:
Thomas Krause wrote:
BTW: There is no way to disable USB completely?
You can try using loader hints:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=device.hintssektion=5
Hi!
Two weeks later, this small typo-correction doesn't reach the RELENG_6
branch. Will it, before src-freeze?
Zahy Gabor at Zahemszky dot HU
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 01:30 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:34PM +0200, Zahemszky G?bor wrote:
Hi!
I've just found,
Zahemszky Gábor wrote:
Hi!
Two weeks later, this small typo-correction doesn't reach the RELENG_6
branch. Will it, before src-freeze?
Zahy Gabor at Zahemszky dot HU
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 01:30 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:34PM +0200, Zahemszky G?bor wrote:
I recently overhauled my RAID array - I now have 4 drives arranged
as RAID 0+1, all being 15K 147gig Fujitsu's, and split across two
buses, which are actively terminated to give U160 speeds (and I have
verified this). The card is a 5304 (128M cache) in a PCI-X slot.
This replaces a set of 6 7200
This patch is an evolution of the last one I sent out. It has
a couple of minor corrections, like a bad forward decl in
the header.
The last patch has had quite a bit of testing and all reports
have been positive. The only complaint was from Gleb who
says he needs to keep his beloved infinite
I synced sources today and tested the em changes, and the problem has
not gone away for me. nvidia0 and em0 are shown as shared with ioacpi
disabled using a device hint.
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 60 0
irq6: fdc0
Pete French wrote:
I recently overhauled my RAID array - I now have 4 drives arranged
as RAID 0+1, all being 15K 147gig Fujitsu's, and split across two
buses, which are actively terminated to give U160 speeds (and I have
verified this). The card is a 5304 (128M cache) in a PCI-X slot.
This
Russell Jackson wrote:
[ ... ]
pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum
Did you notice this? Try reflashing your motherboard to the latest available
BIOS revision, doing a load defaults, and then clearing and reseting the ESCD.
--
-Chuck
___
Is the firewire controller something that you can disable? Can you
selectively disable some of the USB controllers?
Scott
Russell Jackson wrote:
I synced sources today and tested the em changes, and the problem has
not gone away for me. nvidia0 and em0 are shown as shared with ioacpi
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:23:45PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Russell Jackson wrote:
[ ... ]
pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum
Did you notice this? Try reflashing your motherboard to the latest
available BIOS revision, doing a load defaults, and then clearing and
reseting the ESCD.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:39:52PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Is the firewire controller something that you can disable? Can you
selectively disable some of the USB controllers?
Scott
I'll have to try that tomorrow at work. I did disable the em NIC in the
BIOS setup, and (not
Without introduced this new patch, can I still use sysctl to maximise its
performance like FAST_INTR?
S
On 11/9/06, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is an evolution of the last one I sent out. It has
a couple of minor corrections, like a bad forward decl in
the header.
The last
On 11/8/06, Sam Wun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without introduced this new patch, can I still use sysctl to maximise its
performance like FAST_INTR?
S
Not sure if I'm understanding you, but let me try.
You cannot attain the same receive performance without
the patch. When I use SmartBits and
I tried installing FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive
The patch failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is it not designed for my
system?
oz# uname -a
FreeBSD oz.caah.org 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Oct 12
07:40:47 EST 2006 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 05:49:20PM +1100, Simon Biber wrote:
I tried installing FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive
The patch failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is it not designed for my
system?
I had the same problem as Simon on 6.1 boxes.
|+++
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:49:20 +1100
Simon Biber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried installing FreeBSD Security Advisory
FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive
The patch failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is it not designed for
my system?
From the SA:
Affects:FreeBSD 6-STABLE after 2006-09-05
On 11/9/06, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 05:49:20PM +1100, Simon Biber wrote:
I tried installing FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive
The patch failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is it not designed for my
system?
I had the same problem as
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Simon Biber wrote:
I tried installing FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive
The patch failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is it not designed for my
system?
Correct.
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive.asc
notes that this
On 11/9/06, Simon Biber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried installing FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:24.libarchive
The patch failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is it not designed for my
system?
oz# uname -a
FreeBSD oz.caah.org 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Oct 12
07:40:47 EST
32 matches
Mail list logo
