-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar
In the last episode (Oct 14), Artem Kuchin said:
Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD can
clean up something for me (any for many others)^
Here are lines from my top:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
9258 hordelo_ru1
Hi.
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
You run apache with mod_perl or php too. How many clients handle this
apache server? Also in this light load you have locked files! Check
script execution times (/server-status may be useful).
When you have hight load check swap usage and haw many processes are in
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:00:24AM +0100, Rick wrote:
Thanks for the reply. It's actually a remote machine sat in a colo, so
it will require a visit and reboot to look at the BIOS settings, and
it's a pretty minimal set of options IIRC, so there may not be anything
there, but I'll arrange a
On 2007-Oct-15 12:43:39 -0400, William LeFebvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether there is actual swapping going on or not, processes will still need
swap space. There needs to be a backing store for every page that's in
physical memory.
This isn't true for FreeBSD. You can even totally
One basic question to ask: where does the value for offset= in
g_vfs_done() come from ?
From the time the error shows up in syslog I believe, the error only
happens, when a file get's appended.
I wonder if (wild guess follows) there's a 32/64 bit
conversion problem somewhere, like a
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar to YouTube. This server
Just a wild shot here: I have seen a similar message recently when I
played with my disks. I re-arranged some partitions (and filesystems)
within a slice and it so happened (and I almost know why) that there was
some discrepancy between on-disk and in-memory label of that slice. I
ran newfs on
* Alexey Popov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only applies to
large files like mp3 or video.
I've seen highly
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:33:49AM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Esa Karkkainen wrote:
This machine has two 512MB DDR333 DIMM's.
I installed sysutils/memtest and ran three simultaneously, first two
allocated 326 MB each and last one allocated 150 MB of memory, so I'd
start to swap. No errors.
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar to
Esa Karkkainen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:33:49AM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Esa Karkkainen wrote:
This machine has two 512MB DDR333 DIMM's.
I installed sysutils/memtest and ran three simultaneously, first two
allocated 326 MB each and last one allocated 150 MB of memory, so I'd
start
On 10/15/07, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 03:24:33PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
[...]
Pyrun,
I hope you are doing well.
Thank you for the patch, and your good attempt to help with this issue.
I spent 2 hours with the patch
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:46:37AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
I remember that nve(4) is NOT stable under heavy network loads.
Yup, that seems to correct. Usually this machine, ie. home my
orkstation, does not have a load, network wise or in general.
I'd like to say use nfe(4) which is
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 went relatively smooth and apart from ipw
causing panics. However there is one
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 went relatively smooth and apart from ipw
causing panics.
On 2007-Oct-15 18:17:14 +0400, Igor Sysoev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more than 2G. The attached patches against 6.x and 7.x allow to create 2G+
segments.
Useful, thanks.
--- src/sys/sys/shm.h 2007-09-12 23:33:39.0 +0400
+++ src/sys/sys/shm.h 2007-10-15 17:42:38.0 +0400
@@ -77,7
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 went
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:38:43AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Oct-15 18:17:14 +0400, Igor Sysoev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more than 2G. The attached patches against 6.x and 7.x allow to create 2G+
segments.
Useful, thanks.
--- src/sys/sys/shm.h2007-09-12
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I
thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from RELENG_6
Quoting Esa Karkkainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:46:37AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
I remember that nve(4) is NOT stable under heavy network loads.
Yup, that seems to correct. Usually this machine, ie. home my
orkstation, does not have a load, network wise or in
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I
thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from
Josh Carroll wrote:
Not to say that any problems that might have developed with SCHED_4BSD
should not be fixed, but you should give SCHED_ULE a try since it brings
benefits even for single CPU systems (e.g. better interactive response).
For my particular work load, 4BSD is actually faster
Thanks guys,
All done. Just wasn't sure if I could do the upgrade via cvsup.
all done, all working. cool
Thanks for everyone's help.
rob
- Original Message -
From: CmdLnKid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Chalmers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, October
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:01:46PM -0700, Chris H. wrote:
excerpt from this list titled: NFS == lock reboot, that I posted follows:
--8---SNIP---8-SNIP-8---
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 26
16:27:14 PST 2007
Greetings,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I
thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development
On Monday 15 October 2007 10:17 am, Igor Sysoev wrote:
Two years ago Christian S.J. Peron had increased total number of
SysV shm pages on 64-bit platform, that allows to create many shm
segments more than 2G in sum. However, the patch does not allow to
create a single large segment more than
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:01:46PM -0700, Chris H. wrote:
excerpt from this list titled: NFS == lock reboot, that I posted follows:
--8---SNIP---8-SNIP-8---
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 26
16:27:14 PST
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I
thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on
Not to say that any problems that might have developed with SCHED_4BSD
should not be fixed, but you should give SCHED_ULE a try since it brings
benefits even for single CPU systems (e.g. better interactive response).
For my particular work load, 4BSD is actually faster than ULE in
RELENG_7.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Josh Carroll wrote:
Not to say that any problems that might have developed with SCHED_4BSD
should not be fixed, but you should give SCHED_ULE a try since it brings
benefits even for single CPU systems (e.g. better interactive response).
For my particular work load, 4BSD
Hi Josh, thanks for the report. How many CPUs are in your system? Can
you give me the output of 'vmstat 5' over the course of one run on 4BSD
and ULE? Or just one of them if you can't spare the time.
Hi Jeff,
The system has a single quad-core chip, namely an Intel Core 2 Quad
Q6600. Below
From: Chaminda Indrajith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warning: Can't find the `6.2-RELEASE-p4' distribution on this FTP
server. You may need to visit a different server for the release you
are trying to fetch or go to the Options menu and to set the release
name to explicitly match what's
Hi everyone :)
Currently, we have an older version of libdialog/dialog (0.4) into
freebsd base system. I made a patch that update libdialog/dialog to
1.1-20070930 (nowadays maintained by Thomas E. Dickey)
You can see lot of changes on current version of libdialog/dialog at:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 16 22:01:02 2007
I should just be able to change the TAG in standard-supfile from 6_1 to 6_2,
do a cvsup, and the builds etc to end up with 6.2-RELEASE right?
yes? no?
Right. And back, you can change the tag back to 6_1... Or just RELENG_6 for
6-STABLE.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 went
On 2007-10-16, Clifton Royston wrote:
Thanks for this very timely mention! The cluster of servers I am
about to upgrade from 4.8 embarrassed cough to 6.2 relies heavily on
NFS to an old Netapp. If I have got to disable rpc_lockd and
rpc_statd, it's good to know that now!
Can I ask,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:24:29PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
On 2007-10-16, Clifton Royston wrote:
Thanks for this very timely mention! The cluster of servers I am
about to upgrade from 4.8 embarrassed cough to 6.2 relies heavily on
NFS to an old Netapp. If I have got to disable
39 matches
Mail list logo
