Olivier Brisson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze
Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2007 00:06
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RELENG_7 problem with playing DVDs
Using mplayer to try play a DVD my
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Olivier Brisson wrote:
I actually tried with 2 different drives. I can get more detailed, now.
The drive lockup and dmesg spamming till the system has shut down as I
reported it only occurs if I try to use the drives through the cam interface
/dev/cd0 or /dev/cd1. The
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not recognize a
problem.
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not recognize a
problem.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:00:29PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
What are the likely release dates (I'm looking for estimates here) of
FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0? We need 6.3, including all of the MFCed code that's
likely to be included in it, for new servers and would like to begin
experimenting with
Mark Andrews wrote:
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not recognize a
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:27:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck
Olivier Brisson wrote:
Using mplayer to try play a DVD my errorconsole is spammed with:
ata1: FAILURE - non aligned DMA transfer attempted
acd0: setting up DMA failed
The mplayer just hangs around in physrd status and cannot be killed
(even by
kill -9). The error message gets posted until
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:27:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space, so
there are 1.3G
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:27:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
df -h reports that on /var 1.5G of 1.9G are used and only 237M of free
space
remain.
However doing a
du -hd 1 /var
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used space,
so
there are 1.3G
Hi,
these drivers don't work under 7.0
As soon as some mild preasure is applied, they start loosing interrupts, and
in my case the hosts come to a total stand-still, since they are diskless
and rely on the network.
This happens at 1gb and at 100mg.
Maybe the problem is with the shared
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:08:27PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
rihad wrote:
How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the
intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks.
We've used 7-CURRENT since January on a couple of production boxes and
had very
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
Hi,
these drivers don't work under 7.0
As soon as some mild preasure is applied, they start loosing interrupts, and
in my case the hosts come to a total stand-still, since they are diskless
and rely on the network.
Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:08:27PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
rihad wrote:
How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the
intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks.
We've used 7-CURRENT since January on a couple of production
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:00:42PM +0500, rihad wrote:
rihad wrote:
How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the
intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks.
My question was more a theoretical one: it's called BETA for some
reason, otherwise it'd
[Note: stripped excessive Cc.]
Dmitry Marakasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, I was wondering: is unionfs related in any way with -ounion
option of mount_*?
No. The union mount option (-o union) is completely separate
from UNIONFS, although it can be used to achieve a somewhat
similar
Clayton Milos wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:27:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
...
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used
space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not
recognize a
problem.
Try looking at
rihad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question was more a theoretical one: it's called BETA for some
reason, otherwise it'd still be in HEAD. To me BETA means that no major
architectural changes are expected in it any more, no?
That's correct. In theory, if BETA had no bugs (and no new
ones
Clayton Milos wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:27:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
...
and summing up the results I only get to less than 200M of used
space, so
there are 1.3G unaccounted for. fsck in single user mode does not
recognize a
problem.
Ken Smith wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Uhm, are you sure? In the past, whenever a new RELENG
branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable
branch, because -current moved on to the next version
number. Did that policy change?
It is implicitly the *next* -stable but it's
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:21 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
We have entered the final phases of the FreeBSD-7.0 Release cycle which
also means the beginning of the FreeBSD-6.3 Release cycle. Because the
people who support the ports for FreeBSD also need to go through a
freeze cycle as part of
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 01:17:57 pm Guy Helmer wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/23/07, Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using FreeBSD 6.2, I'm having trouble with the Supermicro X7DBR-8+
motherboard (dual Xeon 5130 CPUs on the Blackford chipset -
NCDU.. http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/ncdu/ is your friend ;-))
As in most cases the problem was sitting between the chair and the
keyboard. I
simply overlooked the G when I read that /var/log contained 1.3G of
data.
___
Also, the list of things to do is a bit mis-ordered and truncated. The
official list is in /usr/src/UPDATING and reads:
make sure you have good level 0 dumps
make buildworld
make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:18:30AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Also, the list of things to do is a bit mis-ordered and truncated. The
official list is in /usr/src/UPDATING and reads:
make sure you have good level 0 dumps
make buildworld
make
From: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:18:30 -0400 (EDT)
Also, the list of things to do is a bit mis-ordered and truncated. The
official list is in /usr/src/UPDATING and reads:
make sure you have good level 0 dumps
make
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
Hi,
these drivers don't work under 7.0
As soon as some mild preasure is applied, they start loosing interrupts, and
in my case the hosts come to a total stand-still, since they are diskless
and rely
WHERE is the step to install the kernel?? I always thought it was :
make buildworld
make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
[1]
reboot in single
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
This is my feeling also -- I would consider ABI breakage a show stopper
for 6.x, but feel otherwise that the new code is much more mature and
capable and would be quite beneficial to people building appliances and
related
On Sunday 21 October 2007 04:56:30 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071020 10:21] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on FreeBSD-6,
this
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 09:49:06 am Guy Helmer wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 01:17:57 pm Guy Helmer wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/23/07, Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using FreeBSD 6.2, I'm having trouble with the Supermicro X7DBR-8+
John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 04:56:30 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071020 10:21] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on
* Skip Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071024 10:47] wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
This is my feeling also -- I would consider ABI breakage a show stopper
for 6.x, but feel otherwise that the new code is much more mature and
capable and would be
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
People often talk about either -current and -stable,
so was curious what RELENG_7 would be called right now.
Obviously it's not called -current, but (according to
you and Simon) it's not called -stable either.
I have been making an effort in the
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 03:44:52 pm Kris Kennaway wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 04:56:30 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071020 10:21] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alfred Perlstein
Hello,
I just had a kernel panic using BETA1. According to the Developer
Handbook Kernel Debugging, I'm supplying the following information in
hopes that it is useful. Please note: I'm not familiar with this
process so you need more data, just ask:
kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I just had a kernel panic using BETA1. According to the Developer
Handbook Kernel Debugging, I'm supplying the following information in
hopes that it is useful. Please note: I'm not familiar with this
process so you need more data, just ask:
kgdb kernel.debug
Hello,
My installworld of RELENG_6 from a few hours ago failed with this error
(from memory):
/lib/libncurses.so.6: undefined symbol: __mb_sb_limit
This broke everything that depended on libncurses, plus PAM. I had to
force a reboot via DDB and copy /usr/obj/lib/libc/libc.so.6 to /lib
using
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE can support this network card?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xd6088086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor'
class= network
subclass = ethernet
[]s
--
Daniel Dias Gonçalves
DGNET Network Solutions
[EMAIL
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:28 -0200, daniel wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE can support this network card?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xd6088086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor'
class= network
subclass = ethernet
[]s
Should
On 10/25/07, Alson van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
My installworld of RELENG_6 from a few hours ago failed with this error
(from memory):
/lib/libncurses.so.6: undefined symbol: __mb_sb_limit
This broke everything that depended on libncurses, plus PAM. I had to
force a
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:12:44PM +0300, Oleg Lomaka wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
Hi,
these drivers don't work under 7.0
As soon as some mild preasure is applied, they start loosing
interrupts, and
in my case
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:17:38AM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I just had a kernel panic using BETA1. According to the Developer
Handbook Kernel Debugging, I'm supplying the following information in
hopes that it is useful. Please note: I'm not familiar with
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:28:46PM -0200, Daniel Dias Gon?alves wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE can support this network card?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xd6088086 chip=0x816810ec
rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor'
class= network
On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
Hello,
My installworld of RELENG_6 from a few hours ago failed with this
error (from memory):
/lib/libncurses.so.6: undefined symbol: __mb_sb_limit
This broke everything that depended on libncurses, plus PAM. I had
to force a reboot
On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/07, Alson van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
My installworld of RELENG_6 from a few hours ago failed with this error
(from memory):
/lib/libncurses.so.6: undefined symbol: __mb_sb_limit
This broke everything that
On 10/25/07, David Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
Hello,
My installworld of RELENG_6 from a few hours ago failed with this
error (from memory):
/lib/libncurses.so.6: undefined symbol: __mb_sb_limit
This broke everything that
47 matches
Mail list logo
