On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:25:32PM +, Pete French wrote:
You've already received the right advice about not renaming the INDEX,
but I think it's also worth mentioning that untar'ing a static picture
of the ports tree is of little practical value unless you never plan
to update the
Pete French wrote:
You've already received the right advice about not renaming the INDEX,
but I think it's also worth mentioning that untar'ing a static picture
of the ports tree is of little practical value unless you never plan
to update the base, and you never plan to update any ports on that
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:20:08 -0600
Greg Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Maestro 2E sound card that works perfectly on
6.2-RELEASE-p8, but not on 6.3-PRERELEASE. Here's the dmesg:
Could be something else (acpi? bus changes? etc). The sound driver
stuffs virtually unchanged.
[...]
Pete French wrote:
Yes, it definitely will not work. When files are deleted from the ports
tree after your initial tarball extraction, c[v]sup will not notice that
they are missing (since it does not have a baseline), and will not
remove them. Thus, you will encounter ports with stale
Yes, it definitely will not work. When files are deleted from the ports
tree after your initial tarball extraction, c[v]sup will not notice that
they are missing (since it does not have a baseline), and will not
remove them. Thus, you will encounter ports with stale patches that
no
Hi, I've got a 250GB ide disk, that I put in an external usb box.
I've made 3 partitions under linux, ext2, all works fine.
in dmesg I've got no error :
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: SAMSUNG SP2514N \\\\ Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device
da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
da0:
