RE: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-03 Thread David Schwartz
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: Does FreeBSD have support for digitally signed binary checking, similar to what Linux has with bsign and DigSig, where system binaries are signed and this signature is verified before being run in the kernel? If an

Re: ZFS Bittorent - Hang?

2008-04-03 Thread Ivan Voras
jbsnyder wrote: Hi - I'm not yet filing a PR on this since I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue. I've got ZFS running on a raid-z with 4 disks, C2Duo 2.33 Ghz, 64-bit FreeBSD 7 release, 4GB RAM. For the most part this has been working perfectly, but I recently I tried

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-03 Thread Ivan Voras
Roland Smith wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: Does FreeBSD have support for digitally signed binary checking, similar to what Linux has with bsign and DigSig, where system binaries are signed and this signature is verified before being run in the

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-03 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 21:09:59 Forrest Aldrich wrote: Does FreeBSD have support for digitally signed binary checking, similar to what Linux has with bsign and DigSig, where system binaries are signed and this signature is verified before being run in the kernel? There is mac_chkexec[1],

Re: QA on textdumps (fwd)

2008-04-03 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:51:52 +0200 Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while the system is experiencing a panic, it does not have any knowledge about filesystems and also does not know about the GELI swap space anymore. In this situation the geli encrypted swap will be overwritten by a dump

Re: QA on textdumps (fwd)

2008-04-03 Thread Vince Hoffman
Norberto Meijome wrote: On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:51:52 +0200 Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while the system is experiencing a panic, it does not have any knowledge about filesystems and also does not know about the GELI swap space anymore. In this situation the geli encrypted swap will be

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-03 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:12:27 -0700 David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He would face a chicken and egg problem. To make a signed executable to set his key to be accepted, he would need his key to already be accepted. Uhm, if the attacker managed to get a hole in the sustem and get in, he

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-03 Thread Roland Smith
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:46:39PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: Roland Smith wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: Does FreeBSD have support for digitally signed binary checking, similar to what Linux has with bsign and DigSig, where system binaries are signed

Re: Access Problems with 7.0

2008-04-03 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Doug Hardie wrote: Hi, I recently upgraded 3 of my 5 servers to 7.0. Two of them are on new hardware and one is on hardware that used to run 6.2. Since then, 2 of my thousands of users are unable to access the servers running 7.0. They can access the server running

Re: FreeBSD 7 and multiple IP (mijail-patch in 6.x)

2008-04-03 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Johan Ström wrote: Hi, I got a machine running 6.2 right now, which is being replaced. And since SMP performance is much better on 7.x I'd like to go with 7.0 (and many ppl have indeed verified that it works good on this box, HP DL360 G5)... But, now when I start to setup

Re: FreeBSD 7 and multiple IP (mijail-patch in 6.x)

2008-04-03 Thread Johan Ström
On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Johan Ström wrote: Hi, I got a machine running 6.2 right now, which is being replaced. And since SMP performance is much better on 7.x I'd like to go with 7.0 (and many ppl have indeed verified that it works good on

System hangs when /var partition full (vnode_pager_putpages errors)

2008-04-03 Thread Maks Verver
Hi, I recently encountered an error, where executing the ImageMagick convert tool as an unpriviliged user caused the system to hang. The error is similar to one reported in 2004: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2004-March/006493.html There is also an open bug report:

Re: QA on textdumps (fwd)

2008-04-03 Thread Volker
On 04/03/08 16:22, Norberto Meijome wrote: On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:51:52 +0200 Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while the system is experiencing a panic, it does not have any knowledge about filesystems and also does not know about the GELI swap space anymore. In this situation the geli

Re: QA on textdumps (fwd)

2008-04-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: Dear all, I've now completed the MFC of basic textdump support to 7.0. Once I've had a chance to ping Brooks about it, either he or I will MFC support for ddb.conf, which allows configuring textdump and debugging scripts

Re: [kgdb] There is no member named pathname

2008-04-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 28 February 2008 05:56:32 pm pluknet wrote: Hello, I've updated to the recent RELENG_7 as of 2008/02/28 to try the new kld-add feature in kgdb, among other things (yes, i do debug kernel modules). This should be fixed with the MFC today. -- John Baldwin

64 bits linux binary on amd64 FreeBSD

2008-04-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I'd like to run folding at home on FreeBSD (my OS of choice) and I have this problem of needing to run a amd64 binary. all I saw when emulating on freebsd was a 32 bits linux enviroment, and all I found about amd64 enviroment for amd64 linux emu on freebsd was a mail from a mailing list