On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:42:40PM +0900, dikshie wrote:
i just phone computer store and check together the BIOS.
it seems my computer store put the disk on IDE mode NOT on AHCI mode.
after change to AHCI now FreeBSD can detect SATA 300 (for WDC) and
SATA 150 (for DVD-R).
Great, there you go.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:27:13AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I believe NCQ is supported, assuming that your controller is operating
in AHCI mode and your disk supports NCQ. This mainly applies to Intel
ICHx controllers, but there are others which support it as
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
No. ata(4) driver currently doesn't support/use NCQ.
Thanks for this information -- I had no idea! I'll add this to my
Common Issues page, although it's not so much an issue but more so a
feature.
I was always under the impression that AHCI included automatic support
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Have you checked SMART statistics of the drive, or run SMART tests?
Install ports/sysutils/smartmontools and use smartctl -a /dev/ad4, and
provide the output.
2) Is the error always on ad4? If so, is the error
On Mon, May 12, 2008 00:52, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this PR (with patch) to add APM and acoustic management control
to atacontrol. The PR was opened in May 2005 has not been changed since
December 2006 and is still open.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:16:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 00:52, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this PR (with patch) to add APM and acoustic management control
to atacontrol. The PR was opened in May 2005 has not been
On Mon, May 12, 2008 03:23, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:16:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 00:52, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this PR (with patch) to add APM and acoustic management
control to
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:36:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 03:23, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:16:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ataidle is easy enough to find, I won't deny, but why make users do the
google search and install a port
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I am too, but PRs that are 2 years old which include patches for severe
bugs that affect reliability of RAID is (in my opinion) not acceptable.
I've been spanked over saying this before (you don't understand how
open source works), but necessity easily supercedes
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
[20080229] A change in the way that FreeBSD sends TCP options has been
reported to cause odd interactions with some cable modem routers. While this
issue is still under investigation, a change has been committed to HEAD that
returns the option processing to that
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Linux has more eyes period, which helps a lot. In addition Linux has
more commercial sponsorship - having said that, I've no idea if libdata
development has had any such sponsorship...
As I know the most of active libata developers have full-time job
in Linux companies,
On Mon, 12 May 2008 05:34:47 +0100 (BST)
John Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I have a realtek network card and am using a cable modem
router. Does anyone know if fixes for problems with these (see
below) have been backported from HEAD to RELENG_7?
FWIW, I had major troubles with re(4)
On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:37:53 +0200
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I had major troubles with re(4) around 7.0-release, and a while
later (I had to use patches). After upgrading to 7-stable on
2008-04-12, re(4) is working for me without patches.
(sigh).. it seems that I spoke
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:44:22PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:37:53 +0200
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I had major troubles with re(4) around 7.0-release, and a while
later (I had to use patches). After upgrading to 7-stable on
2008-04-12,
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I am too, but PRs that are 2 years old which include patches for severe
bugs that affect reliability of RAID is (in my opinion) not acceptable.
I've been spanked over saying this before (you don't understand how
open source works), but necessity
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:54:58AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I am too, but PRs that are 2 years old which include patches for severe
bugs that affect reliability of RAID is (in my opinion) not acceptable.
I've been spanked over saying this before
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Dr Joe Karthauser wrote:
I have reclassified this faulty mirror as cvsup1 and made cvsup a cname to
cvsup3, which is the most recent addition and best hardware available. In
the future we will always point to the most available machine in this way.
Looks like I'm getting
On Mon, 12 May 2008 05:32:07 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this machine using pf(4) at all?
No. Not intentionally, and not in any way that I can tell:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD kg-vm.kg4.no 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #11: Mon May 12 16:39:19
CEST 2008 [EMAIL
I have added options USB DEBUG to my kernconf file (DYSTANT). Here
is the backtrace:
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DYSTANT]$ sudo kgdb kernel.debug
/var/crash/vmcore.6
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
/usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol ps_pglobal_lookup]
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:38:51PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
I have added options USB DEBUG to my kernconf file (DYSTANT). Here
is the backtrace:
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DYSTANT]$ sudo kgdb kernel.debug
/var/crash/vmcore.6
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:38:51PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
I have added options USB DEBUG to my kernconf file (DYSTANT). Here
is the backtrace:
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DYSTANT]$ sudo
Greetings,
I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
I setenv WITH_KQEMU
I compiled the port with make -DWITH_KQEMU
I edited src.conf and added WITH_KQEMU=yes
I make config and checked KQEMU ALPHA support
I am running
#uname -a
FreeBSD Aa.bsd 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #3: Mon Apr 21
I seem to be able to lock my machine by going into wpa_cli and asking it
to 'reassoc'. The reason for question mark after hard is that debug
information (caused by wlandebug and athdebug) is being printed on the
console. The only way to get machine's attention is to hold power button
for 8
Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
I seem to be able to lock my machine by going into wpa_cli and asking it
to 'reassoc'. The reason for question mark after hard is that debug
information (caused by wlandebug and athdebug) is being printed on the
console. The only way to get machine's attention is
On May 12, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
echo kqemu_enable=YES /etc/rc.conf
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/kqemu start
Is this documented anywhere?
Also, I volunteered to update the wiki and the author was grateful for
that but I didn't get
On May 12, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
echo kqemu_enable=YES /etc/rc.conf
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/kqemu start
I looked at the rc script and all it does is kldload aio and kqemu. I
already have them loaded by default.
This still does
Hi,
I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been
fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more stable now?
Thanks!
Pierre-Luc Drouin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On May 13, 2008, at 12:24 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 May 13, at 0:18, bazzoola wrote:
I press Ctrl + Alt + 2
then I type info kqemu
I get kqemu support: not compiled
Without looking, I'd guess this means the qemu binary was built
without kqemu support enabled.
as I
On 2008 May 13, at 0:18, bazzoola wrote:
I press Ctrl + Alt + 2
then I type info kqemu
I get kqemu support: not compiled
Without looking, I'd guess this means the qemu binary was built
without kqemu support enabled.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL
On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:18:32 EDT bazzoola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 12, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
echo kqemu_enable=YES /etc/rc.conf
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/kqemu start
This should probably be described in pkg-message.
I
Hi,
I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been
fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more stable now?
Thanks!
Pierre-Luc Drouin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Thanks for your quick reply I appreciate that! Please see below:
On May 13, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:18:32 EDT bazzoola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 12, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
echo
32 matches
Mail list logo
