Re: unable to upgrade to 7.1-PRE

2008-08-30 Thread John Scroggins
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 02:20 +, John Birrell wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 06:09:43PM -0700, John Scroggins wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have attempted to upgrade to 7.1-Pre with no avail. > > My source tree is has been cleaned and /usr/obj is cleared every time > > the system is rebuilt

Re: unable to upgrade to 7.1-PRE

2008-08-30 Thread John Birrell
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 06:09:43PM -0700, John Scroggins wrote: > Hello all, > > I have attempted to upgrade to 7.1-Pre with no avail. > My source tree is has been cleaned and /usr/obj is cleared every time > the system is rebuilt. I have swapped over the kernel config to the > latest Generic and

Re: unable to upgrade to 7.1-PRE

2008-08-30 Thread Dan Langille
John Scroggins wrote: Hello all, I have attempted to upgrade to 7.1-Pre with no avail. My source tree is has been cleaned and /usr/obj is cleared every time the system is rebuilt. I have swapped over the kernel config to the latest Generic and uncommented the dtrace hooks -- but my build conti

unable to upgrade to 7.1-PRE

2008-08-30 Thread John Scroggins
Hello all, I have attempted to upgrade to 7.1-Pre with no avail. My source tree is has been cleaned and /usr/obj is cleared every time the system is rebuilt. I have swapped over the kernel config to the latest Generic and uncommented the dtrace hooks -- but my build continues to fall on its face

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: >> This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the >> endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with >> zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread Henri Hennebert
John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread O. Hartmann
Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no a

RE: IPMI and Dell ERA/O

2008-08-30 Thread Jonathan Bond-Caron
On Fri Aug 29 03:44 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 02:17:17AM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: >> Curiously, IPMI shares the ethernet ports with the onboard ethernet >> controllers without FreeBSD's knowledge. It does use a different MAC >> address. It is also apparently ca

RE: IPMI and Dell ERA/O

2008-08-30 Thread Jonathan Bond-Caron
On Fri Aug 29 11:24 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > If your BIOS doesn't tell us about the IPMI BMC via ACPI or SMBIOS, > you can try using hints (I've seen machines thave a BMC, but the BIOS > doesn't bother to tell you about it). Dell boxes I've seen have KCS > at the default address, so you can

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
O. Hartmann wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail. My 7.0 box upg

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread O. Hartmann
O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail. My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morn

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread O. Hartmann
Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail. My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning: FreeBSD ids.ea

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail. My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning: FreeBSD ids.eagle.ca 7.1-PRERELEASE

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now

2008-08-30 Thread O. Hartmann
Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Dan Allen wrote: Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail. My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning: FreeBSD ids.eagle.ca 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEA

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread Henri Hennebert
John Birrell wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:40:12AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: I believe that the buildworld that you have is OK, even when built with the CTF data it's the installworld when things go bad. Do you need me to send you any files to recover from this problem? No problem,

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread John Birrell
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:40:12AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: > >I believe that the buildworld that you have is OK, even when built with the > >CTF data it's the installworld when things go bad. > > > >Do you need me to send you any files to recover from this problem? > > No problem, I have

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread Henri Hennebert
John Birrell wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: I try, but with the wold of 7.1-PRERELEASE I got cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault: 11 (program ld) Please submit a full bug report. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. *** Error code 1 H

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread John Birrell
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: > I try, but with the wold of 7.1-PRERELEASE I got > > cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault: 11 (program ld) > Please submit a full bug report. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > *** Error code 1 Henri, please

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-30 Thread Henri Hennebert
John Baldwin wrote: On Friday 29 August 2008 03:57:46 am Henri Hennebert wrote: Henri Hennebert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kerne