I have recently been pointed to the u3g driver and gave it a try,
because UBSA works very unreliable for me.
- In combination with PF-NAT I get kernel panics under high load.
- I have to hack some buffer sizes in the driver to get the full
3G speed.
- Often my USB-3G stick is not detected,
Dag-Erling Smørgrav pisze:
Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved into
the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server.
ZFS has been in 7 for over a year.
DES
Yes, it's in STABLE, however zfs module says:
I have only one CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz
(2400.10-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6fb Stepping = 11
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,
This is from systat -v and this behavior is not the same as yours, CSW
during problems could
[...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved into
the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server.
ZFS has been in 7 for over a year.
DES
Yes, it's in STABLE, however zfs module says:
This module (opensolaris) contains code covered by the
Common
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:04:10PM +0300, Igor Lyapin wrote:
I have only one CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz
(2400.10-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6fb Stepping = 11
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,
This is from systat -v
Can you please fix whatever mail client you're using to not wrap lines?
The data you've sent is impossible to read because of this.
Sorry
3 usersLoad 1.91 1.87 1.89 Nov 19 12:26
Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP
PAGER
Tot
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:28:59PM +0300, Igor Lyapin wrote:
Can you please fix whatever mail client you're using to not wrap lines?
The data you've sent is impossible to read because of this.
Sorry
3 usersLoad 1.91 1.87 1.89 Nov 19 12:26
Mem:KBREAL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Tancsa writes:
I could fear that you have two fifologs running at the same time,
possibly as a result of syslogd doing something strange on sighup...
There is nothing really strange about the config. Any idea on how to resolve?
Not right now, there is nothing
Hello Ivan,
Where is the system busy? For start, try to collect information about
what are your processes doing - for example from top(1).
4 usersLoad 1.43 1.46 1.27 Nov 19 13:14
Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER
Claus Guttesen pisze:
[...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved into
the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server.
ZFS has been in 7 for over a year.
DES
Yes, it's in STABLE, however zfs module says:
This module (opensolaris) contains code
Igor Lyapin wrote:
I already sent # top head in my first mail
that's all non idle top process
last pid: 56920; load averages: 2.90, 2.25, 1.72 up
0+22:10:12 20:04:05
210 processes: 2 running, 207 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU states: 8.3% user, 0.0% nice, 32.5% system,
Yeah
I thought also about bios bug... it`s pretty new piece of HW with modern
chipset (Q45). I believe that the next release of BIOS comes soon.
But what about those atapicd problems? Is it related to SATA interface
of DVD/CD drive? Maybe also the LG drive has buggy FW :).
Best regards
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:43:09AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Igor Lyapin wrote:
I already sent # top head in my first mail
that's all non idle top process
last pid: 56920; load averages: 2.90, 2.25, 1.72 up
0+22:10:12 20:04:05
210 processes: 2 running, 207
Hello Ivan,
Thank's Ivan you quite right this was problem with php session. Programmer set
up in
script's 2 years of session life. It was about 460k files in /var/tmp.
COMMAND
55546 www 1 -40 198M 24912K ufs1 0:25 29.39% httpd
55986 www 1 -40
Nenhum_de_Nos pisze:
hail,
I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59
BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices,
around the
Sossi Andrej schrieb:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 31, size: 4096
Can somebody help me understand why the system crashed this way or how
to avoid future crash?
This happens when it takes more than 20 seconds to swap out a page
hail,
I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59
BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices,
around the first 120GB are gathered
Peter,
At this point, I've reinstalled the system, so I can't say.
Jim
-- In Response to your message -
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:56:45 +1100
To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: _nyssin undefined
Opps,
bad mailing-list... excuse me.
Jan Sebosik napsal(a):
Yeah
I thought also about bios bug... it`s pretty new piece of HW with modern
chipset (Q45). I believe that the next release of BIOS comes soon.
But what about those atapicd problems? Is it related to SATA interface
of DVD/CD
On Wed, November 19, 2008 10:39 am, Bartosz Stec wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos pisze:
hail,
I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13
23:54:59
BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
where I have two 750GB
On Wed, November 19, 2008 6:05 am, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have recently been pointed to the u3g driver and gave it a try,
because UBSA works very unreliable for me.
- In combination with PF-NAT I get kernel panics under high load.
- I have to hack some buffer sizes in the driver to get the
I upgraded from 6.2 to 6.3 p5 last night. Upon rebooting, the second disk in
the mirror is missing.
# atacontrol status ar0
ar0: ATA RAID1 status: DEGRADED
subdisks:
0 ad0 ONLINE
1 MISSING
# grep ata /var/run/dmesg.boot
ad0: 238475MB WDC WD2500AVJB-63UDA0 00.02C01 at ata0-master
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 09:15:12AM -0800, Mark Sams wrote:
I upgraded from 6.2 to 6.3 p5 last night. Upon rebooting, the second disk in
the mirror is missing.
# atacontrol status ar0
ar0: ATA RAID1 status: DEGRADED
subdisks:
0 ad0 ONLINE
1 MISSING
# grep ata
- Original Message
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're using Intel MatrixRAID, aren't you? Please migrate away from
this immediately, your data is at risk.
Ummm... I don't think so. It is just a standard RAID 1 mirror using the
built in ICH5 chip. It has been running fine
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:29:19AM -0800, Mark Sams wrote:
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're using Intel MatrixRAID, aren't you? Please migrate away from
this immediately, your data is at risk.
Ummm... I don't think so. It is just a standard RAID 1 mirror using the
built in
Well it's not simple indeed. I use ZFS on my home (not critical) box
(RAIDZ1). After 4 weeks uptime with varied workload I assumed it's
stable. Unfortunately ZFS crashed next week ;)
Tune your system for ZFS and the crashes will go away.
Read this: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
A
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:32:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:29:19AM -0800, Mark Sams wrote:
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're using Intel MatrixRAID, aren't you? Please migrate away from
this immediately, your data is at risk.
Ummm... I
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:48:51PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:32:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:29:19AM -0800, Mark Sams wrote:
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're using Intel MatrixRAID, aren't you? Please migrate
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Ramesh Ayyagari
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my server primarily runs postfix experiencing very huge inflow of mails
6 per hour. There are some other services that the servers runs like
caching DNS etc but postfix being the primary application running on it.
my server primarily runs postfix experiencing very huge inflow of mails 6
per hour. There are some other services that the servers runs like caching DNS
etc but postfix being the primary application running on it.
Ram
From: Glen Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're using Intel MatrixRAID, aren't you? Please migrate away from
this immediately, your data is at risk.
Although I am not using Matrix RAID, I guess I will switch to gmirror to be
safe. Does the following approach seem valid?
1) Break the mirror (ar0)
2) Reboot using ad0
3) (from
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 03:43:02PM -0800, Mark Sams wrote:
You're using Intel MatrixRAID, aren't you? Please migrate away from
this immediately, your data is at risk.
Although I am not using Matrix RAID, I guess I will switch to gmirror to be
safe. Does the following approach
Ganbold wrote:
#3 0xc06ab8b3 in vput (vp=0xc3d11ac8) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2202
#4 0xc06a69e6 in dounmount (mp=0xc3e59b30, flags=524288,
td=0xc3b31d20) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1288
#5 0xc06aa493 in vfs_unmountall () at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2939
#6 0xc062b7f4 in
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:50:46PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Ganbold wrote:
#3 0xc06ab8b3 in vput (vp=0xc3d11ac8) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2202
#4 0xc06a69e6 in dounmount (mp=0xc3e59b30, flags=524288,
td=0xc3b31d20) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1288
#5 0xc06aa493 in
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:50:46PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Ganbold wrote:
#3 0xc06ab8b3 in vput (vp=0xc3d11ac8) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2202
#4 0xc06a69e6 in dounmount (mp=0xc3e59b30, flags=524288,
td=0xc3b31d20) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1288
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 03:18:10PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:50:46PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Ganbold wrote:
#3 0xc06ab8b3 in vput (vp=0xc3d11ac8) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2202
#4 0xc06a69e6 in dounmount (mp=0xc3e59b30,
36 matches
Mail list logo
