Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 11:55:07 Mikhail T. wrote:
I'm trying to migrate a filesystem from one disk to another using:
dump a0hCf 0 32 - /old | restore -rf -
(/old is already mounted read-only). The process runs for a while and
then stops with:
[...]
Hello all,
The subject describes my goal. I'm aware of the usual caveats - if
there's more than one jail, no UID overlap, this will really only work in
one jail if all jails are on the same filesystem, etc.
I found a very, very old post that has an... interesting... technique:
Daniel O'Connor ÎÁÐÉÓÁ×(ÌÁ):
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 11:55:07 Mikhail T. wrote:
I'm trying to migrate a filesystem from one disk to another using:
dump a0hCf 0 32 - /old | restore -rf -
(/old is already mounted read-only). The process runs for a while and
then stops
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:19 +0800, wsk wrote:
Robert Noland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:28 +0800, wsk wrote:
Ok, this patch should work on NV50 chips also.
What you get is EXA and Xv.
You still need:
A recent -CURRENT or -STABLE.
git master
Hi,
After turning debuging on, it seems that the iir driver
is loosing an interrupt while probing:
...
gdt_next(0xc7666000)
gdt_mpr_test_busy(0xc7666000) gdt_intr(0xc7666000)
gdt_mpr_get_status(0xc7666000) gdt_mpr_intr(0xc7666000)
gdt_free_ccb(0xc7666000, 0xc767e444)
gdt_sync_event(0xc7666000, 3,
Hi,
I have a LSI Logic sata/sas raid running, is there a way to see the
state of
the volume, like optimal, degraded or resyncing?
I've tried several commands with camcontrol but I cant figure it out.
--
Peter Ankerstål
pe...@pean.org
http://www.pean.org/
On 24 Mar 2009, at 13:40, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Hi,
I have a LSI Logic sata/sas raid running, is there a way to see the
state of
the volume, like optimal, degraded or resyncing?
There is sysutils/linux-megacli
Yes, looks like ports/130505 is still pending unfortunately
I've tried
On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
On 24 Mar 2009, at 13:40, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Hi,
I have a LSI Logic sata/sas raid running, is there a way to see the
state of
the volume, like optimal, degraded or resyncing?
There is sysutils/linux-megacli
Sorry about that.
Hello all,
I've been getting some panics with a 7.1 stable machine from March 14th.
I've not been able to determine the cause nor reproduce them at will.
Here's a backtrace from the latest panic on March 23rd. Let me know if any
more information is needed. Thanks.
Unread portion of the kernel
Hi.
I noticed strange values in the sysctl branch net.isr:
net.isr.direct: 0
net.isr.count: -458871841
net.isr.directed: 0
net.isr.deferred: -458850991
net.isr.queued: -19290738
net.isr.drop: 0
net.isr.swi_count: -1114653647
I'm running 6.2 release.
AFAICS those oids are still defined as
Danny Braniss написав(ла):
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 11:55:07 Mikhail T. wrote:
I'm trying to migrate a filesystem from one disk to another using:
dump a0hCf 0 32 - /old | restore -rf -
(/old is already mounted read-only). The process runs for a while
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:05:05AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
The subject describes my goal. I'm aware of the usual caveats - if
there's more than one jail, no UID overlap, this will really only work in
one jail if all jails are on the same filesystem, etc.
I found a very, very old
Danny Braniss написав(ла):
can you try splitting it in 2, ie no pipe?
dump a0f some.file /old (or dump 0f - /old | gzip -c file.dump.gz)
restore rf some.file
Same problem:
restore -rf ibmo.0.2009-03-24.dump
load: 0.55 cmd: restore 11303 [nbufkv] 3.53u 3.91s 4%
On Mar 24, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
On 24 Mar 2009, at 13:40, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Hi,
I have a LSI Logic sata/sas raid running, is there a way to see
the state of
the volume, like optimal, degraded or
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
Don't test whether the nonoptimal_volumes parameter works, it does -
but if you pull a drive, FreeBSD likes to panic both on the loss of
a disk
and then again when the drive is reconnected and the
Charles Sprickman wrote:
There is sysutils/linux-megacli
Sorry about that. This is not megaraid its the mpt driver.
LSI SAS3041E-R PCI-e
mpt0: LSILogic SAS/SATA Adapter port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
0xd021-0xd0213fff,0xd020-0xd020 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3
mpt0: [ITHREAD]
mpt0: MPI
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Scott Long wrote:
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
Don't test whether the nonoptimal_volumes parameter works, it
does -
but if you pull a drive, FreeBSD likes to panic both on the
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
Don't test whether the nonoptimal_volumes parameter works, it does -
but if you pull a drive, FreeBSD likes to panic both on the loss of a
disk
and then again when the drive is
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Scott
Im running RELENG_7 cvsuped and built like 15 hours ago. I still
have this problem.
Please come back to me if you want some additional information
about the setup.
--
Peter Ankerstål
pe...@pean.org
http://www.pean.org/
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Scott Long wrote:
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
Don't test whether the nonoptimal_volumes parameter works, it does -
but if you pull a drive, FreeBSD likes
Scott Long wrote:
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
The instability during a rebuild should be fixed in 7.2 (and 7-stable as
of about the last month). If you can, please update your sources and
let me know if it helps.
As for actually monitoring and configuring arrays, that work is in
progress.
Scott
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Scott Long wrote:
Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
Don't test whether the nonoptimal_volumes parameter works, it
How to set and use the RES_USEVC / usevc option as mentioned in:
/usr/src/lib/libc/net/resolver.3
/usr/src/include/resolv.h
/usr/src/lib/libc/net/res_debug.c
/usr/src/share/man/man5/resolver.5 # options statement / env_var
The usevc option does not work when used in place of the debug
option
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Scott
Im running RELENG_7 cvsuped and built like 15 hours ago. I still
have this problem.
Please come back to me if you want some additional information about
the setup.
--
Peter Ankerstål
pe...@pean.org
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:05:05AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
The subject describes my goal. I'm aware of the usual caveats - if
there's more than one jail, no UID overlap, this will really only work in
one jail if all jails are on the same
Mikhail T. wrote:
dump 0aCf 64 /ibm/ibmo.0.2009-03-24.dump /old
DUMP: WARNING: should use -L when dumping live read-write filesystems!
I thought you said it was a read-only filesystem?
In my experience, restore can sometimes throw warnings if you dump a
live filesystem. It might be
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:30:37 -0400
Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 11:55:07 Mikhail T. wrote:
I'm trying to migrate a filesystem from one disk to another using:
dump a0hCf 0 32 - /old | restore -rf -
(/old is
Andrew Snow написав(ла):
Mikhail T. wrote:
dump 0aCf 64 /ibm/ibmo.0.2009-03-24.dump /old
DUMP: WARNING: should use -L when dumping live read-write
filesystems!
I thought you said it was a read-only filesystem?
It was yesterday. Today I remounted it rw to remove some junk-files,
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:48:56 Mikhail T. wrote:
Andrew Snow написав(ла):
Mikhail T. wrote:
dump 0aCf 64 /ibm/ibmo.0.2009-03-24.dump /old
DUMP: WARNING: should use -L when dumping live read-write
filesystems!
I thought you said it was a read-only filesystem?
It was
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
morning is still hanging (in sbwait) -- I've never seen this before. I'm
also very troubled, that such an important functionality (dump/restore!)
is sooo problem-prone, and yet so few people seem to care...
Well, works for me.
Well, would like a login on
Yoshihiro Ota написав(ла):
No big difference:
dump a0f - /old | restore -rf -
[...]
DUMP: 17.25% done, finished in 3:27 at Tue Mar 24 05:42:00 2009
DUMP: 20.36% done, finished in 3:09 at Tue Mar 24 05:28:13 2009
DUMP: 23.83% done, finished in 2:50 at Tue Mar 24
Mikhail T. wrote:
Now can one get /real/ support for the most basic functionality of the
most advanced modern Unix in the world? Thanks,
I think before this goes any further, you will need to try
rebooting/unmouting it, running fsck on it, and then dump the unmounted
partition and see how that
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 12:38:04 Mikhail T. wrote:
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
morning is still hanging (in sbwait) -- I've never seen this before. I'm
also very troubled, that such an important functionality (dump/restore!)
is sooo problem-prone, and yet so few people seem to care...
Andrew Snow написав(ла):
Mikhail T. wrote:
Now can one get /real/ support for the most basic functionality of the
most advanced modern Unix in the world? Thanks,
I think before this goes any further, you will need to try
rebooting/unmouting it, running fsck on it, and then dump the
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
That said, I point out, that for me, dump is not failing (although it
did hang this morning). It is the restore, which fails to read dump's
output:
You can't tell the difference between dump producing mangled output or restore
bombing out on valid input..
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 13:10:23 Mikhail T. wrote:
Now can one get /real/ support for the most basic functionality of the
most advanced modern Unix in the world? Thanks,
Maybe you should return it to the shop and ask for your money back.
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 13:10:23 Mikhail T. wrote:
Now can one get /real/ support for the most basic functionality of the
most advanced modern Unix in the world? Thanks,
Maybe you should return it to the shop and ask for your money back.
Well, if
Daniel O'Connor написав(ла):
People ARE helping you, just because they haven't come up with an answer is no
reason to send snarky comments to the list.
No, sorry, people aren't. They are trying, yes, but not even close. The
suggestion to eliminate the -a switch (a no-op, in fact) was
Andrew Snow написав(ла):
I think before this goes any further, you will need to try
rebooting/unmouting it, running fsck on it, and then dump the unmounted
partition and see how that goes.
Rebooted, reran `fsck -y /old' (all clean). Same problem...
-mi
Mikhail T. wrote:
That said, I point out, that for me, dump is not failing (although it
did hang this morning). It is the restore, which fails to read dump's
output:
unknown tape header type 213474529
abort? [yn] n
resync restore, skipped 502 blocks
expected next file 54, got 0
On 2009-03-24, Mikhail T. wrote:
That's true. I just wanted to point out, that someone running dump only
(to make backups) is not going to know, whether his dumps are usable
(for whichever of the two reasons), until he needs them...
Such a person is not making backups and deserves what he
Robert Noland wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:19 +0800, wsk wrote:
Robert Noland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:28 +0800, wsk wrote:
Ok, this patch should work on NV50 chips also.
What you get is EXA and Xv.
You still need:
A recent -CURRENT or
42 matches
Mail list logo