Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

dd 1m zero on the drive and rerun the 8.0Beta4 DVD. Created two slices S1 and S2, and did auto labling (unix partiton) on S1, hit W, the problem persists. Boot system with freeBSD 6.4, and 6.4 sees two slices (MBR partitions) S1 and S2, but no any Unix partition (ad0s1a, ad0s1b etc) on S1.

panic: UMA: page_free used with invalid flags 4

Hello, My server was using FreeBSD-7-Stable and performing a mail server. Software I used is postfix 2.6.3 and dovecot 1.2.4. The hardware is IBM blade server HS-21 CPU: dual Intel E5335 @ 2.00GHz MEM: 3G HD: onboard LSI RAID controller with 2 73G SAS HD. (mpt0: LSILogic SAS/SATA Adapter) The

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hi! I had the same problem with beta4: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-September/011470.html and I tried this fix, and it did not solve the problem. It might be related with the number of slices and partitions one is creating ? I'll try this again today. Tested

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hi! I had the same problem with beta4: [...] My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64. I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning worked. I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using the amd64 boot cd 8-) It seems to be a bug with the amd64

Re: problem with link aggregation failover

On 2009-Sep-13 12:11:45 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net wrote: I have configured the same mac on both cards. This should be done automatically by lagg. When I disconnect the cable from xl0, the network connection dies, and my lagg0 looks like this: lagg0:

Re: problem with link aggregation failover

Hello, What might be the problem with that setup? Both sides of a lagg need to co-operate to pass packets. You need to configure the switch to failover as well. A simple LACP configuration should do? mjb ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hi, * Kurt Jaeger li...@c0mplx.org [090915 09:34]: I had the same problem with beta4: [...] My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64. I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning worked. I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using the

8.0 Install Failure

Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the Extracting ports: Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started cpuid=0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 19 tid 100045 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why I did a where but its way too much to type accurately by

Re: 8.0 Install Failure

On 15 Sep 2009, at 10:52, Doug Hardie wrote: Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the Extracting ports: Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started cpuid=0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 19 tid 100045 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why I did a

Re: 8.0 Install Failure

On 15 September 2009, at 01:52, Doug Hardie wrote: Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the Extracting ports: Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started cpuid=0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 19 tid 100045 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why I did a

Re: problem with link aggregation failover

On 2009-Sep-15 09:50:49 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net wrote: What might be the problem with that setup? Both sides of a lagg need to co-operate to pass packets. You need to configure the switch to failover as well. A simple LACP configuration should do? Yes. I use LACP at

Re: problem booting FreeBSD 8-Beta4 on Soekris net5501

Le Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:57:16 +1000, Graham Menhennitt gra...@menhennitt.com.au a écrit : I'm upgrading a Soekris net5501 from FreeBSD 7-Stable to 8-Beta4 (via source). I've done a buildworld, buildkernel, and installkernel. When I try to boot the new kernel, it stops very early on in the boot

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Kurt Jaeger writes: I had the same problem with beta4: [...] My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64. I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning worked. It seems to be a bug with the amd64 code ? That might be. I

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Jin Guojun writes: I do not enve know how to make dangerously dedicated disk, and the 8.0 may do this sliently. I was told in private conversation dangerously dedicated mode is currently broken (at least with regards to installation), and that it was removed as an option between

8.0 rc.d scripts less verbose?

Hi, Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore. In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for me to increase the verbosity?

newsyslog can't execute command?

Hi. Have I overlooked something, or is it not possible with newsyslog to run a certain command after log rotation? :-( It looks like the patch mentioned here http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2006-06/msg00575.html never made it into the FreeBSD distribution? Bummer ... --

Re: 8.0 rc.d scripts less verbose?

Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore. In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for me to increase

Re: 8.0 rc.d scripts less verbose?

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:59:46 +0200, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote: Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore. In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about

Source level upgrade from 4.9 to CURRENT..

Hi folks. Need help in doing the following, but first want to check and see if it is feasible with the latest Release, or if I'm just going to be spinning my wheels on this one. The Objective. == I have a FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE system which I want to upgrade to 7.X from the

Re: Source level upgrade from 4.9 to CURRENT..

Hi, Reference: From: Rom Albuquerque a_rom...@hotmail.com Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:38:16 + Message-id: snt114-w81d034e5efd1695113d57ed...@phx.gbl Rom Albuquerque wrote: Hi folks. Need help in doing the following, but first want to check and see if it is

Re: 8.0 rc.d scripts less verbose?

On 2009-09-15 16:37, Ronald Klop wrote: Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore. In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for

Re: 8.0-BETA-4: no mouse or keyboard in X.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:24:37PM +1000, Dave Hardman wrote: On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:40:52PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: Le Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:29:58 +1000, Dave Hardman d...@hardman.name a écrit : I upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0-BETA4. Now X will not receive input from

Re: Source level upgrade from 4.9 to CURRENT..

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:38:16PM +, Rom Albuquerque wrote: to halt. So, 4.9 is installed and working, is there a source level backward compatibility issue between 7.x and anything older than 6.0 ? In other words, upgrading from the sources with such an old distribution is a doable task ?