On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:45, mamalos@ wrote:
Dear all,
I am facing many instabilities in FBSD8 with openldap-client and sasl
authentication (GSSAPI in particular). I have setup an openldap 2.4.1 server
with gssapi support (through cyrus-sasl-2.1.23) on a fbsd8-stable amd64
latest sources, in a
Any hints on that one?
I finally got around to getting dhcp/tftp/nfs setup on an internal network
to perform normal installs (and with some pxelinux hackery, the ability to
boot a DOS disk or memtest86 disk images).
Sysinstall in general is kind of an unweildy beast over serial, but one
thin
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Sean McCullough wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, the machine in question has
no access to highspeed internet service and has dialup only. I need to
be able to install the new OS from CD/DVD successfully.
Posting the make and model of the machine or at l
Hello, nicholasbug!
On 2/11/2010 4:34 PM, nickolas...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2010/2/11 Sean McCullough :
>
>> Any ideas as to how to get the 8.0-RELEASE running on my amd64 machine
>> would be appreciated greatly. If I need to ask elsewhere, please
>> recommend accordingly.
>>
>>
> Try binary
Anyone else get a chance to review this?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> I applied drbr_altq.diff to the e1000 driver (sys/dev/e1000) from HEAD on
> top of 8.0-RELEASE kernel sources. It appears to have fixed the immediate
> problem where queues simply don't work on em inter
--On Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:49 PM +0100 Stefan Krueger
wrote:
PS: I had a spare disk so I tried Linux on the same machine, and
ntpd is running fine for 2 days without any problems; so I guess it's
not a hw fault
It is a HW fault. FreeBSD and Linux are just picking different ti
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> One of my machines, the fileserver-with-zfs-to-be[1] has trouble
>>> keeping correct time. Or rather, ntpd is struggling.
>>> In /var/lkog/messages I see this:
>>> Feb 7 12:05:54 kg-f2 ntpd[909]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1)
>>> Feb 7 12:11:16 kg-f2 ntpd[910]: time reset +1.020413 s
>>> Feb
Hello, freebsd-stable folks!
I sincerely hope I am in the correct place to inquire about a small
problem I am having implementing FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE on my AMD Athlon-64
machine. This machine runs FreeBSD 7.2 (amd64 version) without the
slightest problem; but when I attempt to load 8.0 ont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2010/02/11 11:25, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:06:52PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> One of my machines, the fileserver-with-zfs-to-be[1] has trouble
>> keeping correct time. Or rather, ntpd is struggling.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:06:52PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my machines, the fileserver-with-zfs-to-be[1] has trouble
> keeping correct time. Or rather, ntpd is struggling.
> In /var/lkog/messages I see this:
> Feb 7 12:05:54 kg-f2 ntpd[909]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1)
> Feb 7 12
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:13:04PM +0300, GLADtr GLADtr wrote:
> Hello my friends! Help me please with its problem. I`m don`t what it is
> problem...
>
> *mx# uname -a*
> FreeBSD mx.taricat.ru 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Mon Jan 25 09:28:38
> UTC 2010 r...@mx.taricat.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/
I can add output by strace for ping localhost if it is necessary
2010/2/11 GLADtr GLADtr
> Hello my friends! Help me please with its problem. I`m don`t what it is
> problem...
>
> *mx# uname -a*
> FreeBSD mx.taricat.ru 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Mon Jan 25
> 09:28:38 UTC 2010 r...@m
On 2010/02/10 17:58, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi guys,
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet).
It somehow does not manifest when using a simple list and sorting on a
specific column, but it always happens t
Dear all,
I am facing many instabilities in FBSD8 with openldap-client and sasl
authentication (GSSAPI in particular). I have setup an openldap 2.4.1
server with gssapi support (through cyrus-sasl-2.1.23) on a fbsd8-stable
amd64 latest sources, in a esxi host. In the same host I have setup two
on 11/02/2010 20:38 Alan Cox said the following:
> The next public revision guide from AMD will contain an errata (383)
> that documents the bug. However, it doesn't really tell us anything
> that we didn't already know.
Pity. I sort of hoped for more, like a workaround, some magic MSR.
--
And
The next public revision guide from AMD will contain an errata (383)
that documents the bug. However, it doesn't really tell us anything
that we didn't already know.
Alan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 12:43:38 pm Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think I've reported that before, the I thought it's been fixed,
> however I still get data corruptions when writing on NFS volumes.
> Now I wonder - is nobody really using NFS, or do I have that much
> of uncommon setup,
Hi--
On Feb 11, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
[ ... ]
> Feb 7 16:11:45 kg-f2 ntpd[910]: time reset +2.373325 s
>
> and this goes on an on, forever. At any give time, no matter how long the
> machine has been up, ntpq ca report this:
> r...@kg-f2# ntpq -p
> remote ref
Hi--
On Feb 11, 2010, at 9:13 AM, GLADtr GLADtr wrote:
> Hello my friends! Help me please with its problem. I`m don`t what it is
> problem...
Do you have a lo0 interface? Is it up and using IP 127.0.0.1?
# ifconfig lo0
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:13 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 1:38:37 pm Ivan Voras wrote:
> > On 10 February 2010 19:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > on 10/02/2010 20:26 Ivan Voras said the following:
> > >> On 10 February 2010 19:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >>> on 10/02/20
Hi,
One of my machines, the fileserver-with-zfs-to-be[1] has trouble
keeping correct time. Or rather, ntpd is struggling.
In /var/lkog/messages I see this:
Feb 7 12:05:54 kg-f2 ntpd[909]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1)
Feb 7 12:11:16 kg-f2 ntpd[910]: time reset +1.020413 s
Feb 7 12:11:16 kg-f2 ntpd[910]: k
Hello my friends! Help me please with its problem. I`m don`t what it is
problem...
*mx# uname -a*
FreeBSD mx.taricat.ru 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Mon Jan 25 09:28:38
UTC 2010 r...@mx.taricat.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
mx#
*mx# ping 127.0.0.1*
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56
Use gpart and add created partition to your raidz- for example
[code]
backupstorage# gpart create -s GPT ad0
backupstorage# gpart add -b 34 -s 1953525101 -i 1 -t freebsd-zfs -l
disk0 ad0
backupstorage# gpart show
=>34 1953525101 da0 GPT (932G)
34 19535251011 freebsd-z
Some additional information
Same problem now with latest 7-STABLE (two days ago) compiled with GENERIC
kernel settings.
instead of Unknown USB device I now get the dreaded SHORT_XFER-Error.
Apart from that still same behaviour. Anything else I can do?
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 07:20:05PM +0100, Ho
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:05:45PM -0500, jhell wrote:
> ...
> >Feb 9 14:30:27 localhost kernel: psm0: failed to reset the aux device.
> >Feb 9 14:30:27 localhost kernel: psm0: the aux device has gone!
> >(reinitialize).
> ...
> >So far, the least disruptive form of evasive action I've found is
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 17:41 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:50:44 +0100
> Martin Kristensen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:16:12 -0600
> > Robert Noland wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 11:49 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:17:4
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:41, david@ wrote:
I normally run X11 (via xdm) on my laptop.
Today, running FreeBSD 7.3-PRERELEASE as of r203700, the mouse stopped
moving.
Logging in from a pty & checking the last bit of /var/log/messages
showed:
Feb 9 14:30:27 localhost kernel: kbdc: TEST_AUX_PORT st
On 6 Feb 2010, at 09:44, George Mamalakis wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, George Mamalakis wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am running FBSD8-STABLE on an nfsv3 server and an nfsv3 client. My
>>> configuration is based on
>>> http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:50:44 +0100
Martin Kristensen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:16:12 -0600
> Robert Noland wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 11:49 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:17:43 -0600
> > > Robert Noland wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 23:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:40:51AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 15:00:07 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Feb 10), Ulrich Spörlein said:
> > > On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulri
on 11/02/2010 06:37 Alan Cox said the following:
> Here is what I know. Several of us, myself included, have been able to
> reproduce either lockups or machine check exceptions when BOTH the machine
> check driver and superpages are enabled on AMD family 10h processors. There
> have been no repor
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 1:38:37 pm Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 10 February 2010 19:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 10/02/2010 20:26 Ivan Voras said the following:
> >> On 10 February 2010 19:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>> on 10/02/2010 20:03 Ivan Voras said the following:
> When you say "very
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:16:12 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 11:49 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:17:43 -0600
> > Robert Noland wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 23:43 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:01:58 -0600
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 11:49 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:17:43 -0600
> Robert Noland wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 23:43 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:01:58 -0600
> > > Robert Noland wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 22:05
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 08:49 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 12:08:12 -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 19:00 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 09:11:10 -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > > I have a strong suspicion that the issue is w
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:17:43 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 23:43 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:01:58 -0600
> > Robert Noland wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 22:05 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:33:46 +0200
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:53:18 -0500 John Baldwin wrote
about Re: bugs in mpt(4) and mptutil(8):
JB> > This output is definitely wrong, because the drives are split up on
JB> > mpt0 and mpt1 (and the USB stick is not connected to mpt at all :-)
JB> > as can be seen with camcontrol:
JB> Hmm, I aske
37 matches
Mail list logo