On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:36:32AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick typed:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 06:12:27PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:09:21PM +0100, C. P. Ghost typed:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
malenfant# sysctl
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 23.02.2010 16:10 (localtime):
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
I'm frequently getting my machine locked with ahcichX timeouts:
ahcich2: Timeout on slot 0
ahcich2: is cs 0001 ss rs 0001 tfd c0 serr
ahcich2:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 03.03.2010 09:18 (localtime):
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 23.02.2010 16:10 (localtime):
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
I'm frequently getting my machine locked with ahcichX timeouts:
ahcich2: Timeout on slot 0
ahcich2: is cs 0001
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Daniel Braniss wrote:
runing with the experimental nfs server all is ok!
(at least I can't see any mbuf leakage :-)
so now that we can assume that the problem is in NFS/UDP writes via
classic nfsserver, where to look?
It might also be the krpc reply
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 03.03.2010 09:18 (localtime):
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 23.02.2010 16:10 (localtime):
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
I'm frequently getting my machine locked with ahcichX
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:09:56AM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
I'm going to get this kern.timecounter sysctl from the system booted with
a 7.x livecd
this evening. But really, I think this is a regression. Even if this
system is the only
one known to be affected (which I
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:09:56AM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
I'm going to get this kern.timecounter sysctl from the system booted
with a 7.x livecd
this evening. But really, I think this is a regression.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:16:51AM +, Tom Evans wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:09:56AM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
I'm going to get this kern.timecounter sysctl from the system booted
with a 7.x
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, 22:14 +1100, John Marshall wrote:
Another thing I did was to patch the sendmail build config on another
one of the servers, and rebuild, so that sendmail's sleep() would simply
call FreeBSD's nanosleep(2). I have asked on comp.mail.sendmail if
anyone knows why the
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Daniel Braniss wrote:
disabling the krpc reply cache does it, no visible damage. Somehow
this reminds me of my old 1970 beetle, parts would fall off but it would
continue working :-)
where to go from here?
Ok, so it sounds like the leak is in the krpc reply cache code,
After checking with jhb@ re appropriate value of __FreeBSD_version for
the test, I have submitted a build configuration patch to the sendmail
folks so that a sendmail build on FreeBSD = 30 will use
nanosleep(). The patch has been accepted by sendmail and is attached
for reference.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Daniel Braniss wrote:
disabling the krpc reply cache does it, no visible damage. Somehow
this reminds me of my old 1970 beetle, parts would fall off but it would
continue working :-)
where to go from here?
Ok, so it sounds like the leak is in the krpc reply
12 matches
Mail list logo
