On 18 August 2010 14:52, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 August 2010 20:27, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool the first person to actually try and use it :)
Yes, there's one key thing you have to do right now that's not
documented, because of the simplistic PCI structure the
Hi all,
i am getting the error message in $subject when trying to boot from zfs.
I followed the instructions found in:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror
Before posting all config details and asking what i might have done wrong: Is
there any possibility to get a more detailed
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:33:11 +0200
Heinrich Rebehn reb...@ant.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Hi all,
i am getting the error message in $subject when trying to boot from zfs.
I followed the instructions found in:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror
Before posting all config
on 10/08/2010 19:55 pluknet said the following:
On 16 July 2010 19:47, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
The patch should apply fine on both sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c and
sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c.
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/mp_machdep2.diff
Hi.
Just checked on Xen HVM
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:45 AM, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way,
Sometimes after boot I have to kldreload if_igb.ko several
times until watchdog go to sleep, so traffic starts flowing.
Hmmm, the intention is that the VF always be single queue, but I
see the code I used to
On 19 August 2010 20:39, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/08/2010 19:55 pluknet said the following:
On 16 July 2010 19:47, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
The patch should apply fine on both sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c and
sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c.
On Thursday 19 August 2010 12:56 pm, pluknet wrote:
On 19 August 2010 20:39, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/08/2010 19:55 pluknet said the following:
On 16 July 2010 19:47, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
The patch should apply fine on both
sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c and
on 19/08/2010 19:56 pluknet said the following:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (2763.12-MHz 686-class
CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x106a5 Family = 6 Model = 1a Stepping = 5
On 19.08.2010, at 17:24, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:33:11 +0200
Heinrich Rebehn reb...@ant.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Hi all,
i am getting the error message in $subject when trying to boot from zfs.
I followed the instructions found in:
on 19/08/2010 20:46 Heinrich Rebehn said the following:
Now i have another problem:
The root fs on on a 4-disk zfs mirror. I am testing under VMware fusion using
virtual scsi disks. In order to test redundancy, i removed the first disk and
booting failed. The loader reports:
error 1 lba
On 19.08.2010, at 19:50, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/08/2010 20:46 Heinrich Rebehn said the following:
Now i have another problem:
The root fs on on a 4-disk zfs mirror. I am testing under VMware fusion using
virtual scsi disks. In order to test redundancy, i removed the first disk and
On 19 August 2010 21:27, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 19/08/2010 19:56 pluknet said the following:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (2763.12-MHz 686-class
CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x106a5 Family = 6 Model = 1a Stepping = 5
On 19 August 2010 21:26, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday 19 August 2010 12:56 pm, pluknet wrote:
On 19 August 2010 20:39, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/08/2010 19:55 pluknet said the following:
On 16 July 2010 19:47, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
The
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/13/10, Robert Healey wrote:
I recently updated the central file server/router systems for a
pair of research clusters from RELENG_8_0 to RELENG_8_1. After
following the proper procedures, the network throughput when
pulling files from both machines via mxge0 is 200KB/s or
On Thursday 19 August 2010 03:30 pm, pluknet wrote:
On 19 August 2010 21:26, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday 19 August 2010 12:56 pm, pluknet wrote:
On 19 August 2010 20:39, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 10/08/2010 19:55 pluknet said the following:
On 16 July
There is a good software can solve your problem--Partition Manager.
You needn't worry about anything wrong at all; it can help you easily
http://www.extend-partition.com/help/how-to-resize-partition.html resize
partition without data loss. And I want to tell you, this software is free
for use.
16 matches
Mail list logo