> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:44:06AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Hi. I'm still having problems with NFSv4 being very laggy on one
> > > client.
> > > When the NFSv4 server is at 50% idle CPU and the disks are < 1%
> > > busy,
> > > I am
> > > getting horrible throughput on an idle client. Usin
>
> Well I wouldn't say "well". Every client I've set up has had this
> issue,
> and somehow through tweaking various settings and restarting nfs a
> bunch of
> times, I've been able to make it tolerable for most clients. Only one
> client is behaving well, and that happens to be the only machine
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:44:06AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Hi. I'm still having problems with NFSv4 being very laggy on one
> > client.
> > When the NFSv4 server is at 50% idle CPU and the disks are < 1% busy,
> > I am
> > getting horrible throughput on an idle client. Using dd(1) with 1 MB
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:08:45AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: igb related(?) panics on 7.3-STABLE
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <20100830094631.gd12...@core.byshenk.net>
> {snip}
My apologies -- somehow my mail client completely broke the Subject line
and pulled it from ano
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:08:45AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: igb related(?) panics on 7.3-STABLE
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <20100830094631.gd12...@core.byshenk.net>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 08:16:59PM
Bcc:
Subject: Re: igb related(?) panics on 7.3-STABLE
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20100830094631.gd12...@core.byshenk.net>
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
>
> > I've begun seeing problems on a machine runn
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> I've begun seeing problems on a machine running FreeBSD-7.3-STABLE, 64-bit,
> with two igb nics in use. Previously the machine was fine, running earlier
> versions of 7-STABLE, although the load on the network has increased due
> to
