Re: Reproducible Kernel Panic on 8.1-STABLE [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-14 Thread Sergey Nikolenko
On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on 8.1-STABLE(r213395) through the use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount as such: #sshfs usern...@hostname:/home/username local_mountpoint/ This mounts the

Re: Reproducible Kernel Panic on 8.1-STABLE [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-14 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote: On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on 8.1-STABLE(r213395) through the use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount as

Re: Problem with security log

2010-10-14 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:17:58 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: There isn't a 100% reliable way to get rid of this problem. I've been harping about this for years (sorry to sound like a jerk, but this really is a major problem that keeps coming up and annoys users/admins

Re: Problem with security log

2010-10-14 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:17:58 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: There isn't a 100% reliable way to get rid of this problem. I've been harping about this for years (sorry to sound like a jerk, but this

Re: Problem with security log

2010-10-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/10/2010 15:07 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:17:58 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: There isn't a 100% reliable way to get rid of this problem. I've been harping about

Re: Problem with security log

2010-10-14 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:07:48 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: But I classify this problem as high/severe because it makes a mess of things at the worst time possible -- situations where you absolutely need reliable output due to the nature of the problem you're dealing

Bogus igb1: Could not setup receive structures in 8-STABLE

2010-10-14 Thread Terry Kennedy
I've run across a strange problem with the igb driver in 8-STABLE - when I try to do anything with the second igb interface, I get one or more igb1: Could not setup receive structures error messages. This can be reproduced as simply as booting in single-user mode with an empty

Re: Bogus igb1: Could not setup receive structures in 8-STABLE

2010-10-14 Thread Jack Vogel
The problem is mbuf resources, the driver is autoconfiguring the number of queues based on the number of cores, on newer systems with lots of them this is outstripping the mbuf resource pool. I have decided to hard limit the queues to 8, you can fix the number manually by searching for num_queues

Re: Reproducible Kernel Panic on 8.1-STABLE [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-14 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: 0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote: On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on 8.1-STABLE(r213395) through

Re: Bogus igb1: Could not setup receive structures in 8-STABLE

2010-10-14 Thread Terry Kennedy
The problem is mbuf resources, the driver is autoconfiguring the number of queues based on the number of cores, on newer systems with lots of them this is outstripping the mbuf resource pool. That would make sense, as these systems have 16 cores (dual E5520's). I have decided to hard limit