Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being >> present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes >> sure these are built

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 15:31:03 -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > > present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes > > sure these

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Hello, > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes > sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the > WITHOUT_GROFF flag. > >

RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hello, Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could easily e

Re: em 7.1.9

2011-01-20 Thread Jack Vogel
NO, and i was rather irritated by a checkin that broke backward compatibility without even asking me first btw. That should be the only issue however, and it can be fixed by a define. I'll get there soon. Jack On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Hi Jack, >I was hoping

em 7.1.9

2011-01-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
Hi Jack, I was hoping to pull down the latest em drivers from HEAD to stable to see if it will help with the one issue I am seeing still as well as fix the tftp issue with small UDP packets (kern/152853. Apart from removing the sysctl changes (SVN rev 217556 on 2011-01-18 21:14:23Z by mdf)

Re: 8-STABLE/amd64 semi-regular crash with "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled" in "process 12 (swi4: clock)"

2011-01-20 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Eugene. You wrote 19 января 2011 г., 12:50:25: > Yes, I've missed it's PRERELEASE already. > Backtrace points to the problem in em_local_timer() fixed in CURRENT > 7 days ago, take a look: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c#rev1.65 > I run my servers with this